Literature DB >> 24567263

Drift, evolution, and divergence in biologics and biosimilars manufacturing.

Sundar Ramanan1, Gustavo Grampp.   

Abstract

Biological medicines (biologics) are produced in living cells and purified in complex, multi-step processes. Compared with chemically synthesized small-molecule drugs, biologics are more sensitive to changes in manufacturing conditions. Process and product consistency should be founded on rigorous design and control of manufacturing processes, but consistency is ultimately ensured through robust quality systems. Even a minor change in any component of a quality system could lead to product drift, evolution, and divergence, which may impact the quality, safety, efficacy, and/or interchangeability of biologics. Unintended or unexplained deviations in manufacturing processes can lead to excursions in product attributes (i.e., drift). Well-managed quality systems can help detect and mitigate drift. Occasionally, quality attributes could shift outside of established acceptable ranges as the result of a known manufacturing change (defined here as evolution). Such changes should be studied extensively for effects on product safety and efficacy. With the advent of biosimilars, similar biologics will be produced by multiple manufacturers with different quality systems. Different patterns of product drift and evolution could contribute, over time, to clinically meaningful differences among biologics, including among originator products across regions and among originator products and biosimilar products, a process defined here as divergence. Manufacturers and policymakers can minimize the potential impact of divergence by establishing robust pharmacovigilance systems; requiring distinguishable names for all biologics, including both originator products and biosimilars; adhering to high standards for designations of interchangeability; and ensuring that patient medical records accurately reflect the specific biologic dispensed, especially if the biologic could be sourced from multiple manufacturers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24567263     DOI: 10.1007/s40259-014-0088-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BioDrugs        ISSN: 1173-8804            Impact factor:   5.807


  26 in total

Review 1.  Biosimilar: what it is not.

Authors:  Fernando de Mora
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Is a Biologic Produced 15 Years Ago a Biosimilar of Itself Today?

Authors:  Stanton R Mehr; Marj P Zimmerman
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2016-12

Review 3.  Differentiating biosimilarity and comparability in biotherapeutics.

Authors:  Valderilio Azevedo; Brian Hassett; João Eurico Fonseca; Tatsuya Atsumi; Javier Coindreau; Ira Jacobs; Ehab Mahgoub; Julie O'Brien; Ena Singh; Steven Vicik; Brian Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  High-Throughput Assessment of Structural Continuity in Biologics.

Authors:  Caterina Musetti; Mark F Bean; Geoffrey T Quinque; Christopher Kwiatkowski; Lawrence M Szewczuk; John Baldoni; Matthew A Zajac
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  Nomenclature and traceability debate for biosimilars: small-molecule surrogates lend support for distinguishable nonproprietary names.

Authors:  Jingdong Chao; Martha Skup; Emily Alexander; Namita Tundia; Dendy Macaulay; Eric Wu; Parvez Mulani
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 6.  Biosimilars: Key regulatory considerations and similarity assessment tools.

Authors:  Carol F Kirchhoff; Xiao-Zhuo Michelle Wang; Hugh D Conlon; Scott Anderson; Anne M Ryan; Arindam Bose
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Drifts in ADCC-related quality attributes of Herceptin®: Impact on development of a trastuzumab biosimilar.

Authors:  Seokkyun Kim; Jinsu Song; Seungkyu Park; Sunyoung Ham; Kyungyeol Paek; Minjung Kang; Yunjung Chae; Heewon Seo; Hyung-Chan Kim; Michael Flores
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 5.857

Review 8.  The Diversity of Biosimilar Design and Development: Implications for Policies and Stakeholders.

Authors:  Gustavo Grampp; Sundar Ramanan
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.807

Review 9.  Biosimilars: potential implications for clinicians.

Authors:  Misty G Eleryan; Sophia Akhiyat; Monica Rengifo-Pardo; Alison Ehrlich
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol       Date:  2016-06-17

10.  Adaptive laboratory evolution of Corynebacterium glutamicum towards higher growth rates on glucose minimal medium.

Authors:  Eugen Pfeifer; Cornelia Gätgens; Tino Polen; Julia Frunzke
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.