OBJECTIVES: Because of high purchase costs of newer vaccines, financial risk to private vaccination providers has increased. We assessed among pediatricians and family physicians satisfaction with insurance payment for vaccine purchase and administration by payer type, the proportion who have considered discontinuing provision of all childhood vaccines for financial reasons, and strategies used for handling uncertainty about insurance coverage when new vaccines first become available. METHODS: A national survey among private pediatricians and family physicians April to September 2011. RESULTS: Response rates were 69% (190/277) for pediatricians and 70% (181/260) for family physicians. Level of dissatisfaction varied significantly by payer type for payment for vaccine administration (Medicaid, 63%; Children's Health Insurance Program, 56%; managed care organizations, 48%; preferred provider organizations, 38%; fee for service, 37%; P < .001), but not for payment for vaccine purchase (health maintenance organization or managed care organization, 52%; Child Health Insurance Program, 47%; preferred provider organization, 45%; fee for service, 41%; P = .11). Ten percent of physicians had seriously considered discontinuing providing all childhood vaccines to privately insured patients because of cost issues. The most commonly used strategy for handling uncertainty about insurance coverage for new vaccines was to inform parents that they may be billed for the vaccine; 67% of physicians reported using 3 or more strategies to handle this uncertainty. CONCLUSIONS: Many primary care physicians are dissatisfied with payment for vaccine purchase and administration from third-party payers, particularly public insurance for vaccine administration. Physicians report a variety of strategies for dealing with the uncertainty of insurance coverage for new vaccines.
OBJECTIVES: Because of high purchase costs of newer vaccines, financial risk to private vaccination providers has increased. We assessed among pediatricians and family physicians satisfaction with insurance payment for vaccine purchase and administration by payer type, the proportion who have considered discontinuing provision of all childhood vaccines for financial reasons, and strategies used for handling uncertainty about insurance coverage when new vaccines first become available. METHODS: A national survey among private pediatricians and family physicians April to September 2011. RESULTS: Response rates were 69% (190/277) for pediatricians and 70% (181/260) for family physicians. Level of dissatisfaction varied significantly by payer type for payment for vaccine administration (Medicaid, 63%; Children's Health Insurance Program, 56%; managed care organizations, 48%; preferred provider organizations, 38%; fee for service, 37%; P < .001), but not for payment for vaccine purchase (health maintenance organization or managed care organization, 52%; Child Health Insurance Program, 47%; preferred provider organization, 45%; fee for service, 41%; P = .11). Ten percent of physicians had seriously considered discontinuing providing all childhood vaccines to privately insured patients because of cost issues. The most commonly used strategy for handling uncertainty about insurance coverage for new vaccines was to inform parents that they may be billed for the vaccine; 67% of physicians reported using 3 or more strategies to handle this uncertainty. CONCLUSIONS: Many primary care physicians are dissatisfied with payment for vaccine purchase and administration from third-party payers, particularly public insurance for vaccine administration. Physicians report a variety of strategies for dealing with the uncertainty of insurance coverage for new vaccines.
Authors: Lori A Crane; Matthew F Daley; Jennifer Barrow; Christine Babbel; Shannon Stokley; L Miriam Dickinson; Brenda L Beaty; John F Steiner; Allison Kempe Journal: Eval Health Prof Date: 2008-01-08 Impact factor: 2.651
Authors: Megan C Lindley; Angela K Shen; Walter A Orenstein; Lance E Rodewald; Guthrie S Birkhead Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Cynthia A Bonville; Joseph B Domachowske; Donald A Cibula; Manika Suryadevara Journal: Hum Vaccin Immunother Date: 2017-10-13 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Liliana Sánchez-González; Alfonso Rodriguez-Lainz; Alissa O'Halloran; Ali Rowhani-Rahbar; Jennifer L Liang; Peng-Jun Lu; Peter M Houck; Stephane Verguet; Walter W Williams Journal: J Community Health Date: 2017-06
Authors: Mandy A Allison; Sean T O'Leary; Megan C Lindley; Lori A Crane; Laura P Hurley; Brenda L Beaty; Michaela Brtnikova; Andrea Jimenez-Zambrano; Christine Babbel; Stephen Berman; Allison Kempe Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2017-06-07 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Laura P Hurley; Megan C Lindley; Mandy A Allison; Lori A Crane; Michaela Brtnikova; Brenda L Beaty; Megan Snow; Carolyn B Bridges; Allison Kempe Journal: Vaccine Date: 2016-12-23 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Sean T O'Leary; Jessica Cataldi; Megan C Lindley; Brenda L Beaty; Laura P Hurley; Lori A Crane; Michaela Brtnikova; Carol Gorman; Tara Vogt; Yoonjae Kang; Allison Kempe Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2021-10-28 Impact factor: 2.993
Authors: Robert M Goodman; Carolyn B Bridges; David Kim; Jamison Pike; Angela Rose; Lisa A Prosser; David W Hutton Journal: Vaccine Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 3.641