Literature DB >> 24566211

Prospective cohort study of bowel function after robotic sacrocolpopexy.

Christa Lewis1, Charbel Salamon, Jennifer L Priestley, Emil Gurshumov, Patrick Culligan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine bowel function changes 12 months after robotic sacrocolpopexy.
METHODS: We performed a single-center prospective cohort study evaluating bowel function 12 months after robotic sacrocolpopexy between 2007 and 2011. Bowel function symptoms were measured by the Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory, Short Form 8 (CRADI-8). Specific impacts on quality of life with regard to bowel function were evaluated using the Colorectal-Anal Impact Questionnaire, Short Form 7 (CRAIQ-7). "Splinting to defecate" was defined as any positive response to question 4 of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 which reads, "do you ever have to push on the vagina or around the rectum to have or complete a bowel movement?." Lastly, patients were grouped according to perineorrhaphy versus no perineorrhaphy and bowel function scores were examined.
RESULTS: Of 423 consecutive patients who underwent robotic sacrocolpopexy at our institution, 393 (93%) completed a 12-month follow-up. Mean CRADI-8 scores at baseline and 12 months were 21.1 (20) and 7.3 (11), respectively (P < 0.0001). Mean CRAIQ-7 scores at baseline and 12 months were 11.1 (20) and 2.4 (9), respectively (P < 0.0001). Preoperatively, 152 patients reported a need to splint the vagina or perineum to complete a bowel movement. At 12 months, 70% reported complete resolution of "splinting." Con comitant perineorrhaphy was performed on 87 patients and there were no differences in 12-month CRADI-8 or CRAIQ-7 scores between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Robotic sacrocolpopexy was associated with significant improvements in bowel function as measured by CRADI-8 as well as improvements in impact on quality of life as measured by CRAIQ-7.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24566211     DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 2151-8378            Impact factor:   2.091


  4 in total

Review 1.  Robotic Sacrocolpopexy-Is It the Treatment of Choice for Advanced Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse?

Authors:  Janine L Oliver; Ja-Hong Kim
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Contemporary Use and Techniques of Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy With or Without Robotic Assistance for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

Authors:  Patrick J Culligan; Cristina M Saiz; Peter L Rosenblatt
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 7.623

3.  Does concurrent posterior repair for an asymptomatic rectocele reduce the risk of surgical failure in patients undergoing sacrocolpopexy?

Authors:  Olivia H Chang; Emily R W Davidson; Tonya N Thomas; Marie Fidela R Paraiso; Cecile A Ferrando
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-03-07       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Chronic Pelvic Pain, Quality of Life, and Patient Satisfaction After Robotic Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

Authors:  Nimesh Patel; Priyansh Faldu; Mohamed Fayed; Hannah Milad; Pradeep Nagaraju
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-08-17
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.