Literature DB >> 24565752

First assessment of classical swine fever marker vaccine candidate CP7_E2alf for oral immunization of wild boar under field conditions.

Francesco Feliziani1, Sandra Blome2, Stefano Petrini3, Monica Giammarioli4, Carmen Iscaro4, Giulio Severi4, Luca Convito5, Jana Pietschmann6, Martin Beer7, Gian Mario De Mia8.   

Abstract

Oral vaccination against classical swine fever (CSF) is a potent tool to control disease outbreaks in wild boar. So far, vaccination campaigns have been carried out using live attenuated vaccines that do not allow serological differentiation of infected from vaccinated animals (DIVA). Although this drawback is acceptable for wild boar, the use of marker vaccines would facilitate studies on disease and vaccination dynamics. Recently, the CSF marker vaccine candidate CP7_E2alf was assessed for oral immunization under laboratory conditions. Promising results prompted efforts to study the vaccine candidate under field conditions and in bait formulation. In this context, two oral vaccination campaigns were carried out with CP7_E2alf bait vaccines in two areas called 'faunistic-hunting farms' in the region of Umbria, Italy. One campaign was conducted using single vaccination, the second with the routinely employed double vaccination strategy. Both campaigns were carried out before concerted hunting actions were performed. Bait uptake, vaccine virus detection and antibody responses were assessed along with inspections upon gutting. As a comparator, seven wild boar were hand-fed with baits under laboratory conditions. In the field, bait uptake ranged from 63.7% to 98.7%, whereas antibody prevalence reached only 33.3-35.1%. The marker serology showed a strong influence of sample quality on the test outcome with a total of 85% of samples being classified correctly. Vaccine virus was not detectable. Under hand feeding conditions, six out of seven wild boar took up at least one bait, and five of them showed detectable antibody levels seven weeks after vaccination. These results were supplemented by stability tests. Appropriate stability of vaccine virus was shown both under field and laboratory conditions. In total, most results were in line with our expectations. However, optimization of the DIVA assay has to be attempted in the future. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CP7_E2alf; Classical swine fever virus (CSFV); Field trial; Marker vaccine candidate; Oral immunization; Wild boar

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24565752     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  6 in total

1.  Effectiveness of the E2-classical swine fever virus recombinant vaccine produced and formulated within whey from genetically transformed goats.

Authors:  O Sánchez; M Barrera; O Farnós; N C Parra; E R Salgado; P A Saavedra; C D Meza; C I Rivas; M Cortez-San Martín; J R Toledo
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2014-10-01

2.  Porcine Mx1 fused to HIV Tat protein transduction domain (PTD) inhibits classical swine fever virus infection in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Xiaomin Zhang; Jiao Jing; Wenliang Li; Ke Liu; Baojun Shi; Qianqian Xu; Zhiyong Ma; Bin Zhou; Puyan Chen
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 3.  A decade of research into classical swine fever marker vaccine CP7_E2alf (Suvaxyn® CSF Marker): a review of vaccine properties.

Authors:  Sandra Blome; Kerstin Wernike; Ilona Reimann; Patricia König; Claudia Moß; Martin Beer
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 3.683

4.  Measuring impact of vaccination among wildlife: The case of bait vaccine campaigns for classical swine fever epidemic among wild boar in Japan.

Authors:  Ryota Matsuyama; Takehisa Yamamoto; Yoko Hayama; Ryosuke Omori
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 4.779

Review 5.  Controlling of CSFV in European wild boar using oral vaccination: a review.

Authors:  Sophie Rossi; Christoph Staubach; Sandra Blome; Vittorio Guberti; Hans-Hermann Thulke; Ad Vos; Frank Koenen; Marie-Frédérique Le Potier
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 6.  Classical Swine Fever-An Updated Review.

Authors:  Sandra Blome; Christoph Staubach; Julia Henke; Jolene Carlson; Martin Beer
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 5.048

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.