Literature DB >> 24565254

Destination therapy with left ventricular assist devices: for whom and when?

Liane F Porepa1, Randall C Starling2.   

Abstract

Historically, cardiac transplantation is the only definitive therapy for mortality reduction, symptom reduction, and improved quality of life in advanced heart failure. Because of improvement in cardiovascular care there is now a growing number of patients such as the elderly and those with abundant comorbidity who are not eligible for cardiac transplant. Durable mechanical circulatory support is the new reality in the treatment of advanced heart failure in this population subset. The left ventricular assist device (LVAD) has evolved from humble origins as a short-term extracorporeal and pulsatile device into a durable intracorporeal continuous flow device capable of providing permanent support in the form of destination therapy (DT) LVAD. Data gathered from original landmark clinical trials including Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure (REMATCH), and the Heart Mate II Trial, and the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) provide insight into the type of patient and the timing in which to consider DT LVAD therapy. There are a number individual patient warning signs and symptoms that predate clinical decline; thus, identifying individuals who might benefit from a DT LVAD strategy. The adverse event burden that accompanies DT LVAD therapy cannot be ignored when considering LVAD as an adjunct to ongoing medical therapy. Trends in patient selection regarding mechanical circulatory support continue to evolve along with the technology. As more clinical outcome data are gathered we will continue to refine our patient selection criteria and timing of implant.
Copyright © 2014 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24565254     DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2013.12.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Cardiol        ISSN: 0828-282X            Impact factor:   5.223


  5 in total

1.  Mechanical circulatory support devices as destination therapy-current evidence.

Authors:  Thomas Puehler; Stephan Ensminger; Michael Schoenbrodt; Jochen Börgermann; Erik Rehn; Kavous Hakim-Meibodi; Michiel Morshuis; Jan Gummert
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-09

2.  Hemolysate-mediated platelet aggregation: an additional risk mechanism contributing to thrombosis of continuous flow ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Phat L Tran; Maria-Grazia Pietropaolo; Lorenzo Valerio; William Brengle; Raymond K Wong; Toshinobu Kazui; Zain I Khalpey; Alberto Redaelli; Jawaad Sheriff; Danny Bluestein; Marvin J Slepian
Journal:  Perfusion       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The 'Inextricabilis Syndrome': a case with no solution.

Authors:  Tigran Khachatryan; Roy Beigel; Reza Arsanjani; Robert J Siegel
Journal:  Echo Res Pract       Date:  2014-11-04

4.  Electromechanical Conditioning of Adult Progenitor Cells Improves Recovery of Cardiac Function After Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Aida Llucià-Valldeperas; Carolina Soler-Botija; Carolina Gálvez-Montón; Santiago Roura; Cristina Prat-Vidal; Isaac Perea-Gil; Benjamin Sanchez; Ramon Bragos; Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic; Antoni Bayes-Genis
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 6.940

Review 5.  Driveline Infection in Ventricular Assist Devices and Its Implication in the Present Era of Destination Therapy.

Authors:  Gabriel A Hernandez; Jonatan D Nunez Breton; Sandra V Chaparro
Journal:  Open J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-06-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.