Literature DB >> 24563694

Safety and Efficacy of Facial Rejuvenation with Small Gel Particle Hyaluronic Acid with Lidocaine and AbobotulinumtoxinA in Post-Chemotherapy Patients: A Phase IV Investigator-initiated Study.

Ava Shamban1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Due to advances in detection and treatment, approximately 70 percent of cancer patients are living more than five years after diagnosis. Research indicates that appearance worries are of great concern to cancer survivors impacting their quality of life. This is the first Phase IV investigator-initiated study to investigate the safety and efficacy of facial rejuvenation with small gel particle hyaluronic acid with lidocaine and abobotulinumtoxinA in post-chemotherapy patients.
METHODS: The safety and efficacy of facial rejuvenation with small gel particle hyaluronic acid with lidocaine and abobotulinumtoxinA was assessed in nine post-chemotherapy patients. Efficacy of small gel particle hyaluronic acid with lidocaine and abobotulinumtoxinA was measured at baseline, Week 2, and Week 8, using a wrinkle severity assessment score. Safety and tolerability of both products were assessed throughout the study by monitoring the occurrence of adverse events.
RESULTS: Patients received a mean total of 2.4mL of small gel particle hyaluronic acid with lidocaine in the nasolabial folds and 57.8 Units of abobotulinumtoxinA to glabellar lines at baseline. Additionally, at Week 2, a mean total l.OmL of small gel particle hyaluronic acid with lidocaine was administered to four patients. The mean investigator's wrinkle severity assessment score at baseline was 2.22, indicating mild-to-moderate severity. At each of Weeks 2 and 8, there were significant improvements from baseline in wrinkle severity (p=0.004). Overall, small gel particle hyaluronic acid with lidocaine was well tolerated. Adverse events (i.e., bruising, redness, swelling, pain, tenderness, itching or other adverse events) were localized, self-limiting, and resolved within 1 to 2 days. The only adverse event attributed to abobotulinumtoxinA was soreness and slight tenderness at an injection site reported in one patient.
CONCLUSION: Both study products were well tolerated in post-chemotherapy patients with no significant adverse events. There was a clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement in wrinkle severity at Week 2 post-administration as compared to baseline. This improvement was maintained in all patients at Week 8.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 24563694      PMCID: PMC3930538     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol        ISSN: 1941-2789


  12 in total

Review 1.  The hallmarks of cancer.

Authors:  D Hanahan; R A Weinberg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-01-07       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 2.  Late effects of cancer and its treatment.

Authors:  P A Ganz
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.315

3.  A prospective, randomized, parallel group study analyzing the effect of BTX-A (Botox) and nonanimal sourced hyaluronic acid (NASHA, Restylane) in combination compared with NASHA (Restylane) alone in severe glabellar rhytides in adult female subjects: treatment of severe glabellar rhytides with a hyaluronic acid derivative compared with the derivative and BTX-A.

Authors:  Jean Carruthers; Alastair Carruthers
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.398

4.  Cancer survivorship--United States, 1971-2001.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2004-06-25       Impact factor: 17.586

5.  A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled health-outcomes survey of the effect of botulinum toxin type a injections on quality of life and self-esteem.

Authors:  Steven H Dayan; John P Arkins; Amit B Patel; Thomas J Gal
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 3.398

Review 6.  Combination therapy with BOTOX and fillers: the new rejuvnation paradigm.

Authors:  Kiersten R Coleman; Jean Carruthers
Journal:  Dermatol Ther       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.851

Review 7.  Quality of life in long-term survivors of adult-onset cancers.

Authors:  C C Gotay; M Y Muraoka
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1998-05-06       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Quality of life among long-term survivors of breast cancer: Different types of antecedents predict different classes of outcomes.

Authors:  Charles S Carver; Roselyn G Smith; Vida M Petronis; Michael H Antoni
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 9.  The emergence of supportive oncodermatology: the study of dermatologic adverse events to cancer therapies.

Authors:  Yevgeniy Balagula; Steven T Rosen; Mario E Lacouture
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 11.527

10.  Quality of life in long-term, disease-free survivors of breast cancer: a follow-up study.

Authors:  Patricia A Ganz; Katherine A Desmond; Beth Leedham; Julia H Rowland; Beth E Meyerowitz; Thomas R Belin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-01-02       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  3 in total

1.  Aesthetic Treatments in Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Ilaria Proietti; Nevena Skroza; Alessandra Mambrin; Federica Marraffa; Ersilia Tolino; Nicoletta Bernardini; Anna Marchesiello; Giovanni Rossi; Salvatore Volpe; Concetta Potenza
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol       Date:  2021-12-04

Review 2.  Targeting strategies for oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy: clinical syndrome, molecular basis, and drug development.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Bing Zhao; Xuejiao Gao; Jinbing Sun; Juan Ye; Jun Li; Peng Cao
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-10-22

Review 3.  Restorative oncodermatology: Diagnosis and management of dermatologic sequelae from cancer therapies.

Authors:  Anthony M Rossi; Brian P Hibler; Cristian Navarrete-Dechent; Mario E Lacouture
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2020-08-08       Impact factor: 15.487

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.