Monica Rosales1, Kimlin Ashing, Anna Napoles. 1. Center of Community Alliance for Research and Education (CCARE), Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope National Medical Center, 1500 E Duarte Road, Duarte, CA, 91010-3000, USA, monicasrosales@gmail.com.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Receiving quality cancer follow-up care influences survivorship outcomes. Among Latinas, breast cancer is the number one cause of cancer death; yet Latinas do not receive adequate follow-up care. This study examined quality of cancer follow-up care among Latina breast cancer survivors (BCS) and whether it differs by participant language and healthcare system variables (provider specialty, and medical setting). METHODS: Two hundred thirty-two (95 English-speaking Latina and 137 Spanish-speaking) Latina BCS were recruited from the California Cancer Registry, hospital cancer registries, and community agencies. RESULTS: English-speaking Latina BCS were more likely to report receiving cancer follow-up care at a doctor's office (p < 0.001). BCS without a regular place for cancer follow-up care were more likely to report not seeing a primary care provider (p < 0.05) or cancer specialist (p < 0.001) in the past 12 months. English-speaking Latina BCS (p < 0.001), BCS who saw a cancer specialist in the past 12 months (p < 0.001), and received follow-up care at a doctor's office (p < 0.05) reported higher quality of care. Speaking English, having seen a cancer specialist, and receiving follow-up care at a doctor's office were independently associated with higher quality of care, explaining 44 % of the variance. CONCLUSIONS: Our study findings suggest that examining the influence of ethnic and linguistic factors on quality of cancer follow-up care is necessary to address health disparities. Improved access to cancer follow-up care for Spanish-speaking Latina BCS is of particular concern. IMPLICATION OF CANCER SURVIVORS: Identifying follow-up care needs of Latina BCS may contribute to providing high-quality care and improved survivorship outcomes.
INTRODUCTION: Receiving quality cancer follow-up care influences survivorship outcomes. Among Latinas, breast cancer is the number one cause of cancer death; yet Latinas do not receive adequate follow-up care. This study examined quality of cancer follow-up care among Latina breast cancer survivors (BCS) and whether it differs by participant language and healthcare system variables (provider specialty, and medical setting). METHODS: Two hundred thirty-two (95 English-speaking Latina and 137 Spanish-speaking) Latina BCS were recruited from the California Cancer Registry, hospital cancer registries, and community agencies. RESULTS: English-speaking Latina BCS were more likely to report receiving cancer follow-up care at a doctor's office (p < 0.001). BCS without a regular place for cancer follow-up care were more likely to report not seeing a primary care provider (p < 0.05) or cancer specialist (p < 0.001) in the past 12 months. English-speaking Latina BCS (p < 0.001), BCS who saw a cancer specialist in the past 12 months (p < 0.001), and received follow-up care at a doctor's office (p < 0.05) reported higher quality of care. Speaking English, having seen a cancer specialist, and receiving follow-up care at a doctor's office were independently associated with higher quality of care, explaining 44 % of the variance. CONCLUSIONS: Our study findings suggest that examining the influence of ethnic and linguistic factors on quality of cancer follow-up care is necessary to address health disparities. Improved access to cancer follow-up care for Spanish-speaking Latina BCS is of particular concern. IMPLICATION OF CANCER SURVIVORS: Identifying follow-up care needs of Latina BCS may contribute to providing high-quality care and improved survivorship outcomes.
Authors: Kimlin T Ashing-Giwa; Judith S Tejero; Jinsook Kim; Geraldine V Padilla; Gerhard Hellemann Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2007-02-06 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Kimlin T Ashing-Giwa; Patricia Gonzalez; Jung-Won Lim; Cathie Chung; Benjamin Paz; George Somlo; Mark T Wakabayashi Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-07-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Vanessa B Sheppard; Judy Wang; Bin Yi; Toni Michelle Harrison; Shibao Feng; Elmer E Huerta; Jeanne S Mandelblatt Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2008-10-07 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Tinuke O Olagunju; Yihang Liu; Li-Jung Liang; James M Stomber; Jennifer J Griggs; Patricia A Ganz; Amardeep Thind; Rose C Maly Journal: Cancer Date: 2018-04-06 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Haley K Perlow; Stephen J Ramey; Vincent Cassidy; Deukwoo Kwon; Benjamin Farnia; Elizabeth Nicolli; Michael A Samuels; Laura Freedman; Nagy Elsayyad; Raphael Yechieli; Stuart E Samuels Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2018-12-24 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Elizabeth Palmer Kelly; Julia McGee; Samilia Obeng-Gyasi; Chelsea Herbert; Rosevine Azap; Alizeh Abbas; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2021-07-01 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Nirupa Jaya Raghunathan; Deborah Korenstein; Qing S Li; Emily S Tonorezos; Jun J Mao Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2018-10-02 Impact factor: 4.452