Literature DB >> 24563123

Diagnostic accuracy for macroscopic classification of nodular hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and angiography-assisted computed tomography.

Toshifumi Tada1, Takashi Kumada, Hidenori Toyoda, Takanori Ito, Yasuhiro Sone, Seiji Okuda, Sadanobu Ogawa, Takumi Igura, Yasuharu Imai.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The macroscopic type of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a predictor of prognosis. We clarified the diagnostic value of gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the macroscopic classification of nodular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) as compared to angiography-assisted computed tomography (CT).
METHODS: A total of 71 surgically resected nodular HCCs with a maximum diameter of ≤5 cm were investigated. HCCs were evaluated preoperatively using Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI and angiography-assisted CT. HCCs were pathologically classified as simple nodular (SN), SN with extranodular growth (SN-EG), or confluent multinodular (CMN). SN-EG and CMN were grouped as non-SN. Five readers independently reviewed the images using a five-point scale. We examined the accuracy of both imaging modalities in differentiating between SN and non-SN HCC.
RESULTS: Overall, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (A z ) for the diagnosis of non-SN did not differ between Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI and angiography-assisted CT [0.879 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.779-0.937) and 0.845 (95% CI, 0.723-0.919), respectively]. For HCCs >2 cm, the A z for Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI was greater than 0.9. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI for identifying non-SN were equal to or higher than values with angiography-assisted CT in all three categories (all tumors, ≤2 cm, and >2 cm), but the differences were not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Using Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI to assess the macroscopic findings in nodular HCC was equal or superior to using angiography-assisted CT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24563123     DOI: 10.1007/s00535-014-0947-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0944-1174            Impact factor:   7.527


  35 in total

1.  Predictor for histological microvascular invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma: a lesson from 229 consecutive cases of curative liver resection.

Authors:  Susumu Eguchi; Mitsuhisa Takatsuki; Masaaki Hidaka; Akihiko Soyama; Tetsuo Tomonaga; Izumi Muraoka; Takashi Kanematsu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Dynamic computed tomography during arterial portography: the most sensitive examination for small hepatocellular carcinomas.

Authors:  O Matsui; T Takashima; M Kadoya; M Ida; M Suzuki; K Kitagawa; R Kamimura; K Inoue; H Konishi; H Itoh
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1985 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 3.  Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems.

Authors:  J A Swets
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-06-03       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Double phase CT during hepatic arteriography for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Takamichi Murakami; Manabu Takamura; Tonsok Kim; Masatoshi Hori; Michael P Federle; Hiromitsu Onishi; Kaname Tomoda; Hironobu Nakamura
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.528

5.  Comparison of enhancement patterns of histologically confirmed hepatocellular carcinoma between gadoxetate- and ferucarbotran-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Masahiro Okada; Yasuharu Imai; Tonsok Kim; Sachiyo Kogita; Manabu Takamura; Seishi Kumano; Hiromitsu Onishi; Masatoshi Hori; Kazuto Fukuda; Norio Hayashi; Kenichi Wakasa; Michiie Sakamoto; Takamichi Murakami
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI for hepatocellular carcinoma: quantitative evaluation of tumor enhancement in hepatobiliary phase.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Saito; Fumio Kotake; Naoki Ito; Taizo Ozuki; Ryuji Mikami; Kimihiko Abe; Yoko Shimazaki
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.471

7.  Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance images of hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation with histological grading and portal blood flow.

Authors:  Sachiyo Kogita; Yasuharu Imai; Masahiro Okada; Tonsok Kim; Hiromitsu Onishi; Manabu Takamura; Kazuto Fukuda; Takumi Igura; Yoshiyuki Sawai; Osakuni Morimoto; Masatoshi Hori; Hiroaki Nagano; Kenichi Wakasa; Norio Hayashi; Takamichi Murakami
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Gross appearance of hepatocellular carcinoma reflects E-cadherin expression and risk of early recurrence after surgical treatment.

Authors:  Jun Inayoshi; Takafumi Ichida; Soichi Sugitani; Yasunori Tsuboi; Takuya Genda; Nobuyuki Honma; Hitoshi Asakura
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.029

9.  Reevaluation of prognostic factors for survival after liver resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in a Japanese nationwide survey.

Authors:  Iwao Ikai; Shigeki Arii; Masamichi Kojiro; Takafumi Ichida; Masatoshi Makuuchi; Yutaka Matsuyama; Yasuni Nakanuma; Kiwamu Okita; Masao Omata; Kenichi Takayasu; Yoshio Yamaoka
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Improved detection of focal liver lesions at MR imaging: multicenter comparison of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR images with intraoperative findings.

Authors:  Alexander Huppertz; Thomas Balzer; Anthony Blakeborough; Josy Breuer; Andrea Giovagnoni; Gertraud Heinz-Peer; Michael Laniado; Riccardo M Manfredi; Didier G Mathieu; Dieter Mueller; Peter Reimer; Philip J Robinson; Michael Strotzer; Matthias Taupitz; Thomas J Vogl
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Asia-Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: a 2017 update.

Authors:  Masao Omata; Ann-Lii Cheng; Norihiro Kokudo; Masatoshi Kudo; Jeong Min Lee; Jidong Jia; Ryosuke Tateishi; Kwang-Hyub Han; Yoghesh K Chawla; Shuichiro Shiina; Wasim Jafri; Diana Alcantara Payawal; Takamasa Ohki; Sadahisa Ogasawara; Pei-Jer Chen; Cosmas Rinaldi A Lesmana; Laurentius A Lesmana; Rino A Gani; Shuntaro Obi; A Kadir Dokmeci; Shiv Kumar Sarin
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 6.047

2.  Usefulness of combining gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and contrast-enhanced ultrasound for diagnosing the macroscopic classification of small hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Tomoki Kobayashi; Hiroshi Aikata; Masahiro Hatooka; Kei Morio; Reona Morio; Hiromi Kan; Hatsue Fujino; Takayuki Fukuhara; Keiichi Masaki; Atsushi Ohno; Noriaki Naeshiro; Takashi Nakahara; Yohji Honda; Eisuke Murakami; Tomokazu Kawaoka; Masataka Tsuge; Akira Hiramatsu; Michio Imamura; Yoshiiku Kawakami; Hideyuki Hyogo; Shoichi Takahashi; Kazuaki Chayama
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Tumor Markers for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Simple and Significant Predictors of Outcome in Patients with HCC.

Authors:  Hidenori Toyoda; Takashi Kumada; Toshifumi Tada; Yasuhiro Sone; Yuji Kaneoka; Atsuyuki Maeda
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 11.740

4.  [Primary liver tumors : hepatocellular versus intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma].

Authors:  G J Wengert; H Bickel; J Breitenseher; A Ba-Ssalamah
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 5.  JSH Consensus-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: 2014 Update by the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan.

Authors:  Masatoshi Kudo; Osamu Matsui; Namiki Izumi; Hiroko Iijima; Masumi Kadoya; Yasuharu Imai; Takuji Okusaka; Shiro Miyayama; Kaoru Tsuchiya; Kazuomi Ueshima; Atsushi Hiraoka; Masafumi Ikeda; Sadahisa Ogasawara; Tatsuya Yamashita; Tetsuya Minami; Koichiro Yamakado
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 11.740

6.  Comparison of the effectiveness of celiac versus common hepatic artery injection for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma and of the feeding artery on cone-beam computed tomographs obtained during hepatic angiography.

Authors:  Akihiro Hotta; Masaki Ishikawa; Toshihiro Tachikake; Noriaki Matsuura; Naoyuki Toyota; Kazuo Awai
Journal:  Acta Radiol Open       Date:  2021-02-22

7.  Contrast-enhanced computed tomography plus gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for gross classification of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Chuang Chen; Hui Zhao; Xu Fu; LuoShun Huang; Min Tang; XiaoPeng Yan; ShiQuan Sun; WenJun Jia; Liang Mao; Jiong Shi; Jun Chen; Jian He; Jin Zhu; YuDong Qiu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-05-02

8.  The Clinicopathologic and Prognostic Significance of Gross Classification on Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Hepatectomy.

Authors:  Jian He; Jiong Shi; Xu Fu; Liang Mao; Tie Zhou; Yudong Qiu; Bin Zhu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.817

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.