| Literature DB >> 24562936 |
N Maeda1, K Yoshimura, S Yamamoto, A Kuramasu, M Inoue, N Suzuki, Y Watanabe, Y Maeda, R Kamei, R Tsunedomi, Y Shindo, M Inui, K Tamada, S Yoshino, S Hazama, M Oka.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the tumor microenvironment, factors inhibiting the targeting of cancer cells by activated T cells have recently been noted. B7-H3 belongs to the B7 superfamily of immune regulatory ligands and plays an important role in the adaptive immune response of co-inhibitory/stimulatory factors in regulating T cells. However, the degree to which B7-H3 directly affects tumor immune evasion mechanisms remains unclear, particularly in patients with breast cancer. Regulatory T cells (Tregs) are known as a key player in the inhibition of immune mechanisms. The present study demonstrated that expression of B7-H3 on tumor cells and the number of Tregs in the tumor microenvironment independently affected prognosis in breast cancer patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24562936 PMCID: PMC4236607 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-3564-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Surg Oncol ISSN: 1068-9265 Impact factor: 5.344
Fig. 1Immunohistochemical staining and scoring of B7-H3 in breast cancer tissue. B7-H3 expression is shown in both cell membrane and cytoplasm (brown staining). Photos demonstrate each score’s representative histopathology image. A final score of 1–3 belongs to B7-H3 low, and a final score >3 belongs to B7-H3 high. a No B7-H3 expression in breast cancer (a final score of 1; B7-H3 low). b Week intensity of staining in >66 % of breast cancer (a final score of 3; B7-H3 low). c Moderate intensity of staining in >66 % of breast cancer (a final score of 6; B7-H3 high). d High intensity of staining in >66 % of breast cancer (a final score of 9; B7-H3 high). e–h Hematoxylin/eosin staining is shown in a–d. Magnification for all, ×40 (scale bar 20 μm)
Correlation of B7-H3 expression in breast cancer cells and Foxp3-positive cells in TILs with clinicopathologic features in 90 patients
| Clinical parameters | No. of cases | Foxp3-positive cell/TIL | B7-H3 expression | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low (%) | High (%) |
| Low (%) | High (%) |
| ||
| Age (years) | |||||||
| ≤50 | 38 | 21 (23.3) | 17 (18.9) | 0.673 | 12 (13.3) | 26 (28.9) | 0.641 |
| >50 | 52 | 26 (28.9) | 26 (28.9) | 26 (28.9) | 26 (28.9) | ||
| Tumor size (cm) | |||||||
| ≤2 | 40 | 28 (31.1) | 12 (13.3) |
| 17 (18.9) | 23 (25.6) | 1.000 |
| >2 | 50 | 19 (21.1) | 31 (34.4) | 21 (23.3) | 29 (32.2) | ||
| Nodal metastasis | |||||||
| Without | 49 | 37 (41.1) | 21 (13.3) |
| 23 (25.6) | 26 (28.9) | 0.393 |
| With | 41 | 10 (11.1) | 31 (34.4) | 15 (16.7) | 26 (28.9) | ||
| Hormone receptor | |||||||
| Positive | 73 | 41 (45.6) | 32 (35.6) | 0.178 | 28 (31.1) | 45 (50.0) | 0.173 |
| Negative | 17 | 6 (6.7) | 11 (12.2) | 10 (11.1) | 7 (7.8) | ||
| HER2 | |||||||
| Positive | 40 | 13 (14.4) | 27 (30.0) |
| 18 (20.0) | 22 (24.4) | 0.672 |
| Negative | 50 | 34 (37.8) | 16 (17.8) | 20 (22.2) | 30 (33.3) | ||
| Nuclear grade | |||||||
| Low (0,1) | 34 | 25 (27.8) | 9 (10.0) |
| 17 (18.9) | 17 (18.9) | 0.277 |
| High (2,3) | 56 | 22 (24.4) | 34 (37.8) | 21 (23.3) | 35 (38.9) | ||
| Vascular invasion | |||||||
| Positive | 58 | 32 (35.6) | 26 (28.9) | 0.451 | 24 (26.7) | 34 (37.8) | 0.828 |
| Negative | 32 | 15 (16.7) | 17 (18.9) | 14 (15.6) | 18 (20.0) | ||
p values less than 0.05 are in bold
Foxp3 forkhead box P3, TILs tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, HER2 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2
aChi-square analysis
Fig. 2Immunohistochemical detection of Foxp3-positive cell in breast carcinoma tissue. Photos demonstrate each group of representative histopathology image. The ratio of Foxp3-positive cells/TILs was categorized by median value (median 0.097) into high and low ratios of Foxp3 (Foxp3 high and low). a Control. b Foxp3 low in tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (Foxp3-positive cell/TIL; 0.032). c Foxp3 high in tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (Foxp3-positive cell/TIL; 0.11). d–f Hematoxylin/eosin staining is shown in a–c. Magnification for all, ×40 (scale bar 20 μm). Foxp3 forkhead box P3, TILs tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes
Fig. 3Correlation of RFS with B7-H3 expression in breast cancer cells and Foxp3-positive cells in TILs. a B7-H3 high (n = 52) was associated with significantly reduced RFS in patients with breast cancer (p = 0.0137; HR 0.2781; 95 % CI 0.1005–0.7696). b Patients with Foxp3 high (n = 43) had significantly improved RFS compared with Foxp3 low (p = 0.0368; HR 0.2974; 95 % CI 0.0953–0.929). c Further categorized patients into four groups: B7-H3 high/Foxp3 high; B7-H3 high/Foxp3 low; B7-H3 low/Foxp3 high; and B7-H3 low/Foxp3 low. Patients with B7-H3 high/Foxp3 high relapsed within a shorter period than patients with B7-H3 low/Foxp3 low (p = 0.0014; HR 0.1325; 95 % CI 0.0382–0.4596). d The ratio of Foxp3-positive cells in TILs and B7-H3 protein expression in breast cancer cells. No significant difference was found in the ratio of tumor-infiltrating Foxp3-positive cells between B7-H3 high and B7-H3 low (p = 0.532). This correlation was tested by the Mann–Whitney U test. RFS recurrence-free survival, Foxp3 forkhead box P3, TILs tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval
Multivariate analyses showing hazard ratio for patient RFS conferred by tumor size, nodal status, nuclear grade, vascular invasion, hormone receptor, HER2, B7-H3 expression, Foxp3-positive cell in TILs
| Variable | Hazard ratio | 95 % CI |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| B7-H3 expression (high vs. low) | 5.471 | 1.233–24.269 | 0.025 |
| Foxp3-positive cell in TILs (high vs. low) | 3.416 | 0.929–12.564 | 0.065 |
| Lymphovascular invasion (+ve vs. –ve) | 5.405 | 0.670–43.588 | 0.113 |
| Tumor size (≤2 vs. >2 cm) | 1.798 | 0.449–7.199 | 0.407 |
| Nodal status (+ve vs. –ve) | 1.588 | 0.468–5.390 | 0.458 |
| Nuclear grade (grade 1 vs. grade 2,3) | 0.669 | 0.105–4.259 | 0.671 |
| Hormone receptor (+ve vs. –ve) | 0.779 | 0.192–3.161 | 0.726 |
| HER2 (+ve vs. –ve) | 1.070 | 0.351–3.260 | 0.905 |
RFS recurrence-free survival, HER2 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, Foxp3 forkhead box P3, TILs tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, +ve positive, – ve negative, CI confidence interval
aCox’s proportional hazards regression analysis