Literature DB >> 24562825

Activist engineering: changing engineering practice by deploying praxis.

Darshan M A Karwat1, Walter E Eagle, Margaret S Wooldridge, Thomas E Princen.   

Abstract

In this paper, we reflect on current notions of engineering practice by examining some of the motives for engineered solutions to the problem of climate change. We draw on fields such as science and technology studies, the philosophy of technology, and environmental ethics to highlight how dominant notions of apoliticism and ahistoricity are ingrained in contemporary engineering practice. We argue that a solely technological response to climate change does not question the social, political, and cultural tenet of infinite material growth, one of the root causes of climate change. In response to the contemporary engineering practice, we define an activist engineer as someone who not only can provide specific engineered solutions, but who also steps back from their work and tackles the question, What is the real problem and does this problem "require" an engineering intervention? Solving complex problems like climate change requires radical cultural change, and a significant obstacle is educating engineers about how to conceive of and create "authentic alternatives," that is, solutions that differ from the paradigm of "technologically improving" our way out of problems. As a means to realize radically new solutions, we investigate how engineers might (re)deploy the concept of praxis, which raises awareness in engineers of the inherent politics of technological design. Praxis empowers engineers with a more comprehensive understanding of problems, and thus transforms technologies, when appropriate, into more socially just and ecologically sensitive interventions. Most importantly, praxis also raises a radical alternative rarely considered-not "engineering a solution." Activist engineering offers a contrasting method to contemporary engineering practice and leads toward social justice and ecological protection through problem solving by asking not, How will we technologize our way out of the problems we face? but instead, What really needs to be done?

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24562825     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-014-9525-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  3 in total

1.  Sustaining engineering codes of ethics for the twenty-first century.

Authors:  Diane Michelfelder; Sharon A Jones
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Towards emergent ethical action and the culture of engineering.

Authors:  Gloria Hauser-Kastenberg; William E Kastenberg; David Norris
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Just sustainability? Sustainability and social justice in professional codes of ethics for engineers.

Authors:  Cletus S Brauer
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.525

  3 in total
  3 in total

1.  Technological Enthusiasm: Morally Commendable or Reprehensible?

Authors:  Mahdi Kafaee
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  An Approach to Integrating Health Disparities within Undergraduate Biomedical Engineering Education.

Authors:  Maribel Vazquez; Otto Marte; Joseph Barba; Karen Hubbard
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  A Multi-level Review of Engineering Ethics Education: Towards a Socio-technical Orientation of Engineering Education for Ethics.

Authors:  Diana Adela Martin; Eddie Conlon; Brian Bowe
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 3.525

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.