Literature DB >> 24562765

Recent research related to juvenile sex offending: findings and directions for further research.

H Martin Malin1, Fabian M Saleh, Albert J Grudzinskas.   

Abstract

Serious scholarly inquiry into juvenile sex offending represents a relatively new field, dating from the mid 1940s. During the next 4 decades, a mere handful of articles exploring aspects of juvenile sex offending were added to the available literature. By the 1980s, however, the literature began to increase rapidly, a trend that continues today. The purpose of this article is a focused review of the juvenile sex offender literature cited in PubMed over the last 5 years (2009-2013). The authors have chosen studies that will bring readers up to date on research they believe impacts our current understanding of best practices in the management of juvenile sex offending. For convenience, our review is organized into topical categories including research into characteristics and typologies of juvenile sex offenders, risk assessment and recidivism, assessment and treatment, the ongoing debate about mandatory registration of sex offenders as it applies to juveniles, and other thought provoking studies that do not fit neatly into the aforementioned categories. The studies included contain findings that both reinforce and challenge currently held notions about best practices concerning treatment and public policy, suggesting that our knowledge of the field continues to evolve in important ways.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24562765     DOI: 10.1007/s11920-014-0440-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep        ISSN: 1523-3812            Impact factor:   5.285


  30 in total

Review 1.  Review of risk assessment instruments for juvenile sex offenders: what is next?

Authors:  Inge Hempel; Nicole Buck; Maaike Cima; Hjalmar van Marle
Journal:  Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol       Date:  2011-12-05

2.  Clinician's perceptions of indicators of amenability to sex offender-specific treatment in juveniles.

Authors:  Eva R Kimonis; Amanda Fanniff; Randy Borum; Kevin Elliott
Journal:  Sex Abuse       Date:  2010-10-21

3.  Effects of sex offender registration policies on juvenile justice decision making.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Letourneau; Dipankar Bandyopadhyay; Debajyoti Sinha; Kevin Armstrong
Journal:  Sex Abuse       Date:  2009-01-13

4.  Five-year accuracy of assessments of high risk for sexual recidivism of adolescents.

Authors:  Michael P Hagan; Debra L Anderson; Melissa S Caldwell; Therese S Kemper
Journal:  Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol       Date:  2008-10-28

5.  The lived experience of parents of adolescents who have sexually offended: I am a survivor.

Authors:  Sara Pierce
Journal:  J Forensic Nurs       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.175

6.  Victim age-based subtypes of juveniles adjudicated for sexual offenses: comparisons across domains in an outpatient sample.

Authors:  Amanda M Fanniff; David J Kolko
Journal:  Sex Abuse       Date:  2011-11-29

7.  Adolescents who have sexually offended: is phallometry valid?

Authors:  Marnie E Rice; Grant T Harris; Carol Lang; Terry C Chaplin
Journal:  Sex Abuse       Date:  2011-09-29

8.  Knowledge of juvenile sex offender registration laws predicts adolescent sexual behavior.

Authors:  Margaret C Stevenson; Cynthia J Najdowski; Tisha R A Wiley
Journal:  J Child Sex Abus       Date:  2013

9.  Psychological mechanisms underlying support for juvenile sex offender registry laws: prototypes, moral outrage, and perceived threat.

Authors:  Jessica M Salerno; Cynthia J Najdowski; Margaret C Stevenson; Tisha R A Wiley; Bette L Bottoms; Roberto Vaca; Pamela S Pimentel
Journal:  Behav Sci Law       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb

10.  Adolescent sexual offenders: the relationship between typology and recidivism.

Authors:  Chi Meng Chu; Stuart D M Thomas
Journal:  Sex Abuse       Date:  2010-06
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines for the treatment of adolescent sexual offenders with paraphilic disorders.

Authors:  Florence Thibaut; John M W Bradford; Peer Briken; Flora De La Barra; Frank Häßler; Paul Cosyns
Journal:  World J Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 4.132

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.