Literature DB >> 2456190

Interfering cutaneous stimulation and the muscle afferent contribution to cortical potentials.

D Burke1, S C Gandevia.   

Abstract

Cerebral potentials were recorded in response to selective stimulation using microelectrodes of muscle afferents in motor fascicles innervating the intrinsic muscles of the foot or at the motor point of abductor hallucis. The early components of these potentials (P40, N50 and P60) were consistently attenuated by continuous tactile stimulation of related skin areas and by electrical stimulation of digital nerves, timed so that the digital volley reached cortex approximately 5 msec before the muscle afferent volley. The same conditioning cutaneous inputs also attenuated the cerebral potentials evoked by selective stimulation of cutaneous afferents. These findings confirm that there are intermodality and intramodality interactions between low-threshold cutaneous and muscle afferents and between cutaneous afferents, respectively. The findings indicate that 'interference phenomena' (Kakigi and Jones 1986) can occur between different afferent modalities, and within any one modality, and cannot be used to determine the afferent species responsible for the test evoked potential.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2456190     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(88)90112-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  9 in total

1.  Modulation of the response to a somatosensory stimulation of the hand during the observation of manual actions.

Authors:  Julien I A Voisin; Erika C Rodrigues; Sébastien Hétu; Philip L Jackson; Claudia D Vargas; Francine Malouin; C Elaine Chapman; Catherine Mercier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The startle reaction to somatosensory inputs: different response pattern to stimuli of upper and lower limbs.

Authors:  Silvio Alvarez-Blanco; Lucia Leon; Josep Valls-Solé
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Facilitation of cutaneous inputs during the planning phase of gait initiation.

Authors:  Laurence Mouchnino; Aurélie Fontan; Christophe Tandonnet; Joy Perrier; Anahid H Saradjian; Anahid Saradjian; Jean Blouin; Martin Simoneau
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Changes in muscle and cutaneous cerebral potentials during standing.

Authors:  C Applegate; S C Gandevia; D Burke
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Somatosensory evoked potentials following proprioceptive stimulation of finger in man.

Authors:  T Mima; K Terada; M Maekawa; T Nagamine; A Ikeda; H Shibasaki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Partial Unweighting in Obese Persons Enhances Tactile Transmission From the Periphery to Cortical Areas: Impact on Postural Adjustments.

Authors:  Marie Fabre; Patrick Sainton; Chloé Sutter; Laurence Mouchnino; Pascale Chavet
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 3.473

7.  Acoustic Stimuli Can Improve and Impair Somatosensory Perception.

Authors:  Matthias Nuernberger; Denise Schaller; Carsten Klingner; Otto Witte; Stefan Brodoehl
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 5.152

8.  Do gravity-related sensory information enable the enhancement of cortical proprioceptive inputs when planning a step in microgravity?

Authors:  Anahid H Saradjian; Dany Paleressompoulle; Didier Louber; Thelma Coyle; Jean Blouin; Laurence Mouchnino
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Plantar Sole Unweighting Alters the Sensory Transmission to the Cortical Areas.

Authors:  Laurence Mouchnino; Olivia Lhomond; Clément Morant; Pascale Chavet
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 3.169

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.