Literature DB >> 24561736

Patients undergoing PCI from the femoral route by default radial operators are at high risk of vascular access-site complications.

Ihsan M Rafie1, Muez M Uddin, Nicholas Ossei-Gerning, Richard A Anderson, Timothy D Kinnaird.   

Abstract

AIMS: Radial artery (RA) access for PCI has a lower incidence of vascular access-site (VAS) complications than the femoral artery (FA) approach. However, even for default radial operators certain patients are intervened upon from the FA. We examined the demographics and incidence of VAS complications when default radial operators resort to the FA for PCI. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The demographics and VAS complications were compared by access site retrospectively for all PCI cases performed by default radial operators (n=1,392). A modified ACUITY trial definition of major VAS complication was used. FA puncture occurred in 25.2% (351/1,392) of cases. Patients were more likely to be female, older and weigh less than patients undergoing PCI from the RA. The FA procedure was likely to be more complex with larger sheaths, more left main stem, graft and multivessel intervention, and there was a greater proportion of emergency cases. Despite increased case complexity, glycoprotein inhibitors were used less frequently in femoral cases (26.5% vs. 36.8%, p<0.001). A VAS complication occurred in 12.5% (44/351) of cases.
CONCLUSIONS: The risk factors for access-site bleeding are disproportionately high in the population requiring FA puncture by default radial operators, and as a result such patients have a high rate of vascular access-site complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24561736     DOI: 10.4244/EIJV9I10A200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EuroIntervention        ISSN: 1774-024X            Impact factor:   6.534


  11 in total

1.  Routine use of fluoroscopic guidance and up-front femoral angiography results in reduced femoral complications in patients undergoing coronary angiographic procedures: an observational study using an Interrupted Time-Series analysis.

Authors:  Emily V Castle; Krishnaraj S Rathod; Oliver P Guttmann; Alice M Jenkins; Carmel D McCarthy; Charles J Knight; Constantinos O'Mahony; Anthony Mathur; Elliot J Smith; Roshan Weerackody; Adam D Timmis; Andrew Wragg; Daniel A Jones
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Vascular Access and Chronic Total Occlusion Angioplasty.

Authors:  David Smith; Ahmed Hailan; Alexander Chase
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2015-05

3.  Change in hospital-level use of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention and periprocedural outcomes: insights from the national cardiovascular data registry.

Authors:  Steven M Bradley; Sunil V Rao; Jeptha P Curtis; Craig S Parzynski; John C Messenger; Stacie L Daugherty; John S Rumsfeld; Hitinder S Gurm
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2014-06-04

4.  Transradial versus transfemoral access for cardiac catheterization: a nationwide pilot study of training preferences and expertise in The United States.

Authors:  Khalid Changal; Mubbasher Ameer Syed; Ealla Atari; Salik Nazir; Sameer Saleem; Sajjad Gul; F N U Salman; Asad Inayat; Ehab Eltahawy
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.298

5.  Patient preference for radial versus femoral vascular access for elective coronary procedures: The PREVAS study.

Authors:  Marlies M Kok; Marieke G M Weernink; Clemens von Birgelen; Anneloes Fens; Liefke C van der Heijden; Janine A van Til
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 6.  Large-bore Vascular Closure: New Devices and Techniques.

Authors:  Maarten P van Wiechen; Jurgen M Ligthart; Nicolas M Van Mieghem
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2019-02

7.  Transradial versus transfemoral approach in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome. A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Raffaele Piccolo; Gennaro Galasso; Ernesto Capuano; Stefania De Luca; Giovanni Esposito; Bruno Trimarco; Federico Piscione
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Alternative access site choice after initial radial access site failure for coronary angiography and intervention.

Authors:  Dionysios Gatzopoulos; Aggeliki Rigatou; Eleftherios Kontopodis; Ioannis Tsiafoutis; Maria Agelaki; Efstathios Lazaris; Konstantinos Kintis; Sotirios Patsilinakos; Michael Koutouzis
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 3.327

9.  Radial Approach Expertise and Clinical Outcomes of Percutanous Coronary Interventions Performed Using Femoral Approach.

Authors:  Tomasz Tokarek; Artur Dziewierz; Krzysztof Plens; Tomasz Rakowski; Michał Zabojszcz; Dariusz Dudek; Zbigniew Siudak
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Efficacy and safety of balloon-assisted microdissection with Sapphire® II 1.0-mm balloon in balloon-uncrossable chronic total occlusion lesions.

Authors:  Yicong Ye; Xiliang Zhao; Jianjun Du; Yong Zeng
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.671

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.