Literature DB >> 2456169

No reflow and extent of infarction during maximal vasodilation in the porcine heart.

W B Johnson1, S A Malone, G A Pantely, C G Anselone, J D Bristow.   

Abstract

To explore the relation between myocardial and vascular injury in the generation of the no-reflow phenomenon, the pressure-flow relation during maximal vasodilation after coronary artery reperfusion was studied in the open-chest porcine model. During both endogenous and maximal vasodilation with intracoronary adenosine, pressure-flow (P/Q) plots were constructed before and after 20-minute (n = 9) or 40-minute (n = 17) circumflex artery occlusions. Decreases in circumflex vascular bed conductance were represented by downward shifts in P/Q plot regression lines. No significant change occurred in P/Q line slope or pressure at zero flow 30 minutes after release of the 20-minute occlusion, and no infarction was found. After release of the 40-minute occlusion, a small but insignificant decrease in P/Q line slope occurred during endogenous vasodilation. However, during maximal vasodilation, a significant (p less than 0.01) decrease in P/Q line slope was present during reperfusion compared with preocclusion corresponding to a decrease in vasodilatory reserve (P/Q line slope = 1.52 +/- 0.14 ml/min/mm Hg preocclusion vs. 1.03 +/- 0.13 at 15 minutes reperfusion). Pretreatment with aspirin did not prevent this decrease in vascular conductance during maximal vasodilation. Total circumflex, as well as subendocardial, midmyocardial, and subepicardial blood flows, was measured with radioactive microspheres. There was a good correlation between the extent of infarction measured by triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining and the decrease in vascular conductance during maximal vasodilation for all three myocardial layers as well as for the total circumflex vascular bed. Hence, the degree of no-reflow correlates closely with the extent of infarction during maximal vasodilation (but not during endogenous vasodilation) and is not altered by aspirin therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2456169     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.78.2.462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  10 in total

1.  Impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation of coronary resistance vessels in severely stunned porcine myocardium.

Authors:  E O McFalls; D J Duncker; H Ward; P Fashingbauer
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 17.165

Review 2.  Insights into the assessment of myocardial perfusion offered by different cardiac imaging modalities.

Authors:  J R Lindner; S Kaul
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Assessment of coronary microcirculation with myocardial contrast echocardiography: current and future clinical applications.

Authors:  S Kaul
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1995-06

Review 4.  Nitric oxide and cardioprotection during ischemia-reperfusion.

Authors:  Bodh I Jugdutt
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 5.  [Diagnosis of myocardial vitality using contrast echocardiography--ready for routine clinical use?].

Authors:  C Firschke
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.443

6.  Myocardial contrast echocardiography for predicting functional recovery after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Adrian C Borges; Wolf S Richter; Christian Witzel; Matthias Witzel; Andrea Grohmann; Rona K Reibis; Wolfgang Rutsch; Ingeborg Küchler; Dieter L Munz; Gert Baumann
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 7.  Assessment of myocardial viability with two-dimensional echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  J R Lindner; S Kaul
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Myocardial contrast echocardiography is superior to other known modalities for assessing myocardial reperfusion after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  K Greaves; S R Dixon; M Fejka; W W O'Neill; S R Redwood; M S Marber; R Senior
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Role of Coronary Myogenic Response in Pressure-Flow Autoregulation in Swine: A Meta-Analysis With Coronary Flow Modeling.

Authors:  Gregory M Dick; Ravi Namani; Bhavesh Patel; Ghassan S Kassab
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Value of adenosine infusion for infarct size determination using real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography.

Authors:  Paulo Magno Martins Dourado; Jeane Mike Tsutsui; Antonio Carlos Palandri Chagas; João César Nunes Sbano; Vera Demarchi Aiello; Protásio Lemos da Luz; Wilson Mathias; Jose A F Ramires
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2006-02-08       Impact factor: 2.062

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.