Literature DB >> 24561507

Construct validity of the individual work performance questionnaire.

Linda Koopmans1, Claire M Bernaards, Vincent H Hildebrandt, Henrica C W de Vet, Allard J van der Beek.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the construct validity of the Individual Work Performance Questionnaire (IWPQ).
METHODS: A total of 1424 Dutch workers from three occupational sectors (blue, pink, and white collar) participated in the study. First, IWPQ scores were correlated with related constructs (convergent validity). Second, differences between known groups were tested (discriminative validity).
RESULTS: First, IWPQ scores correlated weakly to moderately with absolute and relative presenteeism, and work engagement. Second, significant differences in IWPQ scores were observed for workers differing in job satisfaction, and workers differing in health.
CONCLUSION: Overall, the results indicate acceptable construct validity of the IWPQ. Researchers are provided with a reliable and valid instrument to measure individual work performance comprehensively and generically, among workers from different occupational sectors, with and without health problems.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24561507     DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1076-2752            Impact factor:   2.162


  11 in total

1.  Responsiveness of the individual work performance questionnaire.

Authors:  Linda Koopmans; Jennifer K Coffeng; Claire M Bernaards; Cécile R L Boot; Vincent H Hildebrandt; Henrica C W de Vet; Allard J van der Beek
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  In Pursuit of Work Performance: Testing the Contribution of Emotional Intelligence and Burnout.

Authors:  Martin Sanchez-Gomez; Edgar Breso
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-07-26       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Towards Examining the Link Between Workplace Spirituality and Workforce Agility: Exploring Higher Educational Institutions.

Authors:  Imran Saeed; Jawad Khan; Muhammad Zada; Rezwan Ullah; Alejandro Vega-Muñoz; Nicolás Contreras-Barraza
Journal:  Psychol Res Behav Manag       Date:  2022-01-07

4.  Factorial structure of Individual Work Performance Questionnaire (Version 1.0) revisited: Evaluation of acquiescence bias.

Authors:  Zuleima Santalla-Banderali; Jesús M Alvarado
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Antecedents and Consequences of Grit Among Working Adults: A Transpersonal Psychology Perspective.

Authors:  Devanshi Agrawal; Surekha Chukkali; Sabah Singh
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-07-05

6.  The Mediating Effect of Fatigue on the Nature Element, Organisational Culture and Task Performance in Central Taiwan.

Authors:  Omar Hamdan Mohammad Alkharabsheh; Amar Hisham Jaaffar; Ying-Chyi Chou; Erni Rawati; Pok Wei Fong
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 4.614

7.  Incidence of Leader-Member Exchange Quality, Communication Satisfaction, and Employee Work Engagement on Self-Evaluated Work Performance.

Authors:  Zuleima Santalla-Banderali; Jesús M Alvarado
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 4.614

8.  Autonomy-supportive agents: whose support matters most, and how does it unfold in the workplace?

Authors:  Naniki Mokgata; Leoni van der Vaart; Leon T de Beer
Journal:  Curr Psychol       Date:  2022-07-30

9.  Data on work-related consequences of COVID-19 pandemic for employees across Europe.

Authors:  Jakub Prochazka; Tabea Scheel; Petr Pirozek; Tomas Kratochvil; Cristina Civilotti; Martina Bollo; Daniela Acquadro Maran
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2020-08-18

10.  The Brabant study: design of a large prospective perinatal cohort study among pregnant women investigating obstetric outcome from a biopsychosocial perspective.

Authors:  Margreet Meems; Lianne Hulsbosch; Madelon Riem; Christina Meyers; Tila Pronk; Maarten Broeren; Karin Nabbe; Guid Oei; Stefan Bogaerts; Victor Pop
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.