Literature DB >> 24561333

Effect of different drying methods on the quality of Angelicae Sinensis Radix evaluated through simultaneously determining four types of major bioactive components by high performance liquid chromatography photodiode array detector and ultra-high performance liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry.

Ying-Jia Bai1, Ming Kong2, Jin-Di Xu2, Xiao-Lin Zhang3, Shan-Shan Zhou2, Xiao-Ning Wang2, Li-Fang Liu4, Song-Lin Li5.   

Abstract

In the present study, the effect of drying methods on the quality of Angelicae Sinensis Radix (DG), was evaluated by newly developed high performance liquid chromatography photodiode array detector (HPLC-DAD) and ultra-high performance liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UHPLC-QTOF-MS/MS). Ten major bioactive components including two phenolic acids, two hydroxyl phthalides, four alkyl phthalides and two phthalide dimers were selected as evaluation chemical markers and the newly-established method was qualitatively and quantitatively validated. DG slices and whole roots dried in shade, sun light, hot air, vacuum, microwave, far infrared ray and combination of microwave and far infrared ray as well as the fresh DG samples were determined by the established methods. DG slices dried in hot air kept the similar chemical composition to that of fresh DG, while DG whole roots dried in vacuum retained highest contents of the major components. Coniferyl ferulate and ligustilide degraded significantly in DG slices dried by microwave, far infrared ray and their combination. The influence of such chemical changes induced by different drying methods on the bioactivities of DG warrants further investigation, so that the optimal drying method can be obtained for the standardization of DG herb.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Angelicae Sinensis Radix; Drying methods; Phenolic acids; Phthalides; UHPLC-QTOF-MS/MS

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24561333     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2014.01.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal        ISSN: 0731-7085            Impact factor:   3.935


  5 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances and effective strategies in the discovery and applications of natural products.

Authors:  Jing Xie; Ai-Hua Zhang; Hui Sun; Guang-Li Yan; Xi-Jun Wang
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 4.036

2.  UHPLC-TQ-MS Coupled with Multivariate Statistical Analysis to Characterize Nucleosides, Nucleobases and Amino Acids in Angelicae Sinensis Radix Obtained by Different Drying Methods.

Authors:  Shaoqing Zhu; Sheng Guo; Jin-Ao Duan; Dawei Qian; Hui Yan; Xiuxiu Sha; Zhenhua Zhu
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 4.411

3.  Identification of Chemical Markers for the Discrimination of Radix Angelica sinensis Grown in Geoherb and Non-Geoherb Regions Using UHPLC-QTOF-MS/MS Based Metabolomics.

Authors:  Kaixue Zhang; Menglin Yan; Shu Han; Longfei Cong; Liyao Wang; Liu Zhang; Lili Sun; Haiying Bai; Guanhua Wei; Hong Du; Min Jiang; Gang Bai; Zhigang Yang
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 4.411

4.  Identification of Chemical Components of Qi-Fu-Yin and Its Prototype Components and Metabolites in Rat Plasma and Cerebrospinal Fluid via UPLC-Q-TOF-MS.

Authors:  Hengyu Li; Hongwei Zhao; Yong Yang; Dongmei Qi; Xiaorui Cheng; Jiafeng Wang
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 2.629

5.  Integrated chemical and transcriptomic analyses unveils synthetic characteristics of different medicinal root parts of Angelica sinensis.

Authors:  Ran Xu; Jiang Xu; Yong-Chang Li; Yun-Tao Dai; Shao-Peng Zhang; Guang Wang; Zhi-Guo Liu; Lin-Lin Dong; Shi-Lin Chen
Journal:  Chin Herb Med       Date:  2019-12-24
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.