Literature DB >> 24561233

Prediction in the service of comprehension: modulated early brain responses to omitted speech segments.

Alexandra Bendixen1, Mathias Scharinger2, Antje Strauß2, Jonas Obleser2.   

Abstract

Speech signals are often compromised by disruptions originating from external (e.g., masking noise) or internal (e.g., inaccurate articulation) sources. Speech comprehension thus entails detecting and replacing missing information based on predictive and restorative neural mechanisms. The present study targets predictive mechanisms by investigating the influence of a speech segment's predictability on early, modality-specific electrophysiological responses to this segment's omission. Predictability was manipulated in simple physical terms in a single-word framework (Experiment 1) or in more complex semantic terms in a sentence framework (Experiment 2). In both experiments, final consonants of the German words Lachs ([laks], salmon) or Latz ([lats], bib) were occasionally omitted, resulting in the syllable La ([la], no semantic meaning), while brain responses were measured with multi-channel electroencephalography (EEG). In both experiments, the occasional presentation of the fragment La elicited a larger omission response when the final speech segment had been predictable. The omission response occurred ∼125-165 msec after the expected onset of the final segment and showed characteristics of the omission mismatch negativity (MMN), with generators in auditory cortical areas. Suggestive of a general auditory predictive mechanism at work, this main observation was robust against varying source of predictive information or attentional allocation, differing between the two experiments. Source localization further suggested the omission response enhancement by predictability to emerge from left superior temporal gyrus and left angular gyrus in both experiments, with additional experiment-specific contributions. These results are consistent with the existence of predictive coding mechanisms in the central auditory system, and suggestive of the general predictive properties of the auditory system to support spoken word recognition.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Auditory processing; Omission mismatch negativity (MMN); Predictive coding; Semantic expectation; Source localization

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24561233     DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  19 in total

Review 1.  Attention and prediction in human audition: a lesson from cognitive psychophysiology.

Authors:  Erich Schröger; Anna Marzecová; Iria SanMiguel
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 2.  The role of temporal structure in the investigation of sensory memory, auditory scene analysis, and speech perception: a healthy-aging perspective.

Authors:  Johanna Maria Rimmele; Elyse Sussman; David Poeppel
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 2.997

Review 3.  Multiple functions of the angular gyrus at high temporal resolution.

Authors:  Mohamed L Seghier
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 3.270

Review 4.  Mismatch negativity (MMN) as an index of cognitive dysfunction.

Authors:  Risto Näätänen; Elyse S Sussman; Dean Salisbury; Valerie L Shafer
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 3.020

5.  Direct Evidence for Prediction Signals in Frontal Cortex Independent of Prediction Error.

Authors:  Stefan Dürschmid; Christoph Reichert; Hermann Hinrichs; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Heidi E Kirsch; Robert T Knight; Leon Y Deouell
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Predictions interact with missing sensory evidence in semantic processing areas.

Authors:  Mathias Scharinger; Alexandra Bendixen; Björn Herrmann; Molly J Henry; Toralf Mildner; Jonas Obleser
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  ERP Indices of Stimulus Prediction in Letter Sequences.

Authors:  Edith Kaan; Evan Carlisle
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2014-10-23

8.  Dialect Variation Influences the Phonological and Lexical-Semantic Word Processing in Sentences. Electrophysiological Evidence from a Cross-Dialectal Comprehension Study.

Authors:  Manuela Lanwermeyer; Karen Henrich; Marie J Rocholl; Hanni T Schnell; Alexander Werth; Joachim Herrgen; Jürgen E Schmidt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-05-27

9.  Cardio-audio synchronization drives neural surprise response.

Authors:  Christian Pfeiffer; Marzia De Lucia
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Auditory Pattern Representations Under Conditions of Uncertainty-An ERP Study.

Authors:  Maria Bader; Erich Schröger; Sabine Grimm
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.