Literature DB >> 24561041

Marginal adaptation of class II cavities restored with bulk-fill composites.

Edson Alves Campos1, Stefano Ardu2, Dorien Lefever2, Fernanda Ferreira Jassé3, Tissiana Bortolotto2, Ivo Krejci2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the marginal adaptation of bulk-fill composites in class II MO cavities.
METHODS: Standardized class II MO cavities with bevelled enamel margins were prepared in 40 extracted human molars. The teeth were randomly assigned to one of the five experimental groups (n=8). The teeth were restored with two horizontal increments of composite (4mm and 2mm thickness). The experimental groups were (1st/2nd increment): Gr. A - Venus Bulk-Fill/Venus Diamond; Gr. B - Tetric EvoCeram BulkFill/Tetric EvoCeram; Gr. C - Surefil SDR/Ceram-X; Gr. D - SonicFill; Gr. E - Ceram-X/Ceram-X (control). After finishing procedures, impressions were made using a polyvinyl siloxane and epoxy resin replicas were obtained. Thermo-mechanical stressing was carried out 24h after the restorative procedure. All specimens were submitted to 240,000 occlusal loading and simultaneous 600 thermal cycles in water at 5°C and 50°C. After loading, a new set of epoxy resin replicas was obtained. Scanning electron microscopy was carried out at 200× magnification. Results for the marginal adaptation were expressed as percentages of continuity relative to the exposed interface and analyzed by ANOVA and Duncan post hoc test (p<0.05).
RESULTS: In enamel, no significant differences were detected before and after thermo-mechanical loading between groups. In dentine, the worst results were observed in Gr. A
CONCLUSION: By applying simple layering techniques, bulk-fill materials do not allow better marginal adaptation than a standard composite. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: A new class of resin-base composite (bulk-fill) was recently launched on the market. The bulk-fill composites exhibited adequate marginal adaptation and similar to the results of the standard composite.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bulk-fill; Composites; Marginal adaptation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24561041     DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.02.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent        ISSN: 0300-5712            Impact factor:   4.379


  27 in total

1.  Marginal adaptation and microleakage of a bulk-fill composite resin photopolymerized with different techniques.

Authors:  Vania Stephanie Sánchez Gamarra; Gilberto Antonio Borges; Luiz Henrique Burnett Júnior; Ana Maria Spohr
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  Class II composite resin restorations: faster, easier, predictable.

Authors:  R D Jackson
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Evaluation of cavity wall adaptation of bulk esthetic materials to restore class II cavities in primary molars.

Authors:  Maria D Gaintantzopoulou; Vellore K Gopinath; Spiros Zinelis
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Microleakage of "Bulk-Fill" Composite Resin for Class II Restorations Pretreated With CO2 Laser in Deciduous Molars: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Larissa Costa Santos; Ravana Angelini Sfalcin; Eugenio José Garcia; Fátima Antônia Aparecida Zanin; Aldo Brugnera Junior; Daniela Fátima Teixeira Silva; Anna Carolina Ratto Tempestini Horliana; Kristianne Porta Santos Fernandes; Raquel Agnelli Mesquita-Ferrari; Sandra Kalil Bussadori
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2019-10-01

5.  Marginal quality of a full-body bulk-fill composite placed with an universal adhesive system in etch-and-rinse and self-etch mode: An in vitrostudy.

Authors:  Antonio Signore; Luca Solimei; Marianna-Georgievna Arakelyan; Alina-Vladimirova Arzukanyan; Nicola De Angelis; Andrea Amaroli
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2021-08-01

6.  The influence of different placement techniques on the clinical success of bulk-fill resin composites placed in Class II cavities: a 4-year randomized controlled clinical study.

Authors:  Nazire Nurdan Çakır Kılınç; Sezer Demirbuğa
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-10-12       Impact factor: 3.606

7.  Randomized prospective clinical trial of class II restorations using flowable bulk-fill resin composites: 4-year follow-up.

Authors:  Isis Almela Endo Hoshino; André Luiz Fraga Briso; Lara Maria Bueno Esteves; Paulo Henrique Dos Santos; Sandra Meira Borghi Frascino; Ticiane Cestari Fagundes
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 3.606

8.  Evaluation of marginal sealing quality of restorations with low shrinkage composite resins.

Authors:  Bruno-Mendonça-Lucena de Veras; Renata-Pedrosa Guimarães; Luiz-Carlos Alves; Rafael-José-Ribeiro Padilha; Luana-Osório Fernandes; Carlos-Menezes Aguiar
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-12-01

9.  Six-year clinical evaluation of bulk-fill and nanofill resin composite restorations.

Authors:  Ayse Ruya Yazici; Zeynep Bilge Kutuk; Esra Ergin; Sevilay Karahan; Sibel A Antonson
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Clinical performance of class I cavities restored with bulk fill composite at a 1-year follow-up using the FDI criteria: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Chinni Suneelkumar; Puttaganti Harshala; Koppolu Madhusudhana; Anumula Lavanya; Anirudhan Subha; Sannapureddy Swapna
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2021-04-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.