Literature DB >> 24560841

Brief, pre-learning stress reduces false memory production and enhances true memory selectively in females.

Phillip R Zoladz1, David M Peters2, Andrea E Kalchik2, Mackenzie M Hoffman2, Rachael L Aufdenkampe2, Sarah A Woelke2, Nicholas E Wolters3, Jeffery N Talbot4.   

Abstract

Some of the previous research on stress-memory interactions has suggested that stress increases the production of false memories. However, as accumulating work has shown that the effects of stress on learning and memory depend critically on the timing of the stressor, we hypothesized that brief stress administered immediately before learning would reduce, rather than increase, false memory production. In the present study, participants submerged their dominant hand in a bath of ice cold water (stress) or sat quietly (no stress) for 3 min. Then, participants completed a short-term memory task, the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm, in which they were presented with 10 different lists of semantically related words (e.g., candy, sour, sugar) and, after each list, were tested for their memory of presented words (e.g., candy), non-presented unrelated "distractor" words (e.g., hat), and non-presented semantically related "critical lure" words (e.g., sweet). Stress, overall, significantly reduced the number of critical lures recalled (i.e., false memory) by participants. In addition, stress enhanced memory for the presented words (i.e., true memory) in female, but not male, participants. These findings reveal that stress does not unequivocally enhance false memory production and that the timing of the stressor is an important variable that could mediate such effects. Such results could have important implications for understanding the dependability of eyewitness accounts of events that are observed following stress.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amygdala; Cortisol; False memory; Hippocampus; Stress

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24560841     DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.02.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  10 in total

1.  FKBP5 polymorphisms influence pre-learning stress-induced alterations of learning and memory.

Authors:  Phillip R Zoladz; Alison M Dailey; Hannah E Nagle; Miranda K Fiely; Brianne E Mosley; Callie M Brown; Tessa J Duffy; Amanda R Scharf; McKenna B Earley; Boyd R Rorabaugh
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  Immediate pre-learning stress enhances baseline startle response and fear acquisition in a fear-potentiated startle paradigm.

Authors:  Mackenzie R Riggenbach; Jordan N Weiser; Brianne E Mosley; Jennifer J Hipskind; Leighton E Wireman; Kelsey L Hess; Tessa J Duffy; Julie K Handel; MacKenzie G Kaschalk; Kassidy E Reneau; Boyd R Rorabaugh; Seth D Norrholm; Tanja Jovanovic; Phillip R Zoladz
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  ADRA2B deletion variant influences time-dependent effects of pre-learning stress on long-term memory.

Authors:  Phillip R Zoladz; Alison M Dailey; Hannah E Nagle; Miranda K Fiely; Brianne E Mosley; Callie M Brown; Tessa J Duffy; Amanda R Scharf; McKenna B Earley; Boyd R Rorabaugh
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 2.877

4.  Blunted cortisol response to acute pre-learning stress prevents misinformation effect in a forced confabulation paradigm.

Authors:  Phillip R Zoladz; Chelsea E Cadle; Alison M Dailey; Miranda K Fiely; David M Peters; Hannah E Nagle; Brianne E Mosley; Amanda R Scharf; Callie M Brown; Tessa J Duffy; McKenna B Earley; Boyd R Rorabaugh; Kristie E Payment
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 3.587

5.  Stress and memory encoding: What are the roles of the stress-encoding delay and stress relevance?

Authors:  Grant S Shields; Colton L Hunter; Andrew P Yonelinas
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 6.  Stress time-dependently influences the acquisition and retrieval of unrelated information by producing a memory of its own.

Authors:  Chelsea E Cadle; Phillip R Zoladz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-30

7.  False recognitions in the DRM paradigm: the role of stress and warning.

Authors:  Melike Guzey; Banu Yılmaz
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2021-10-07

8.  Arousal-But Not Valence-Reduces False Memories at Retrieval.

Authors:  Chiara Mirandola; Enrico Toffalini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Effects of post-encoding stress on performance in the DRM false memory paradigm.

Authors:  Enmanuelle Pardilla-Delgado; Sara E Alger; Tony J Cunningham; Brian Kinealy; Jessica D Payne
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 2.460

10.  Memory instability as a gateway to generalization.

Authors:  Edwin M Robertson
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 8.029

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.