Victoria Kunene1, Manuela Miscoria2, Sarah Pirrie3, Mohammad R Islam4, Mehran Afshar1, Emilio Porfiri5. 1. Cancer Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom. 2. Azienda Ospedaliero - Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti Trieste, Dipartimento di Oncologia - Ospedale Maggiore, Trieste, Italy. 3. Cancer Research Clinical Trial Unit, School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom. 4. Department of Medicine, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom. 5. Cancer Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Cancer Research Clinical Trial Unit, School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom. Electronic address: e.porfiri@bham.ac.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Renal tumors with sarcomatoid changes are aggressive malignancies with poor prognosis. Immunotherapy and chemotherapy have provided little benefit. The efficacy of treatments targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway is unclear because of the lack of clinical trial data and the small number of published series. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the clinical records of 23 consecutive patients with advanced sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma who were treated with sunitinib in our center. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, and response rate were evaluated. We also studied the effect on clinical outcome of performance status, prognostic risk group, and proportion of sarcomatoid component. RESULTS: Median OS was 15.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.0-21.2). Median progression-free survival was 5.7 months (95% CI, 3.2-12.6). Seven patients (30%) had an objective response, 5 patients (22%) had stable disease, and 11 (48%) had progressive disease. The median survival of the 13 (56.5%) patients with performance status of 0 to 1 was 20.9 months (95% CI, 9.7-63.3) whereas the medial survival of the 10 (43.5%) patients with performance status of 2 to 3 was 5.0 months (95% CI, 1.1-16.5). Objective responses were observed only among the 13 (56.5%) patients with performance status of 0 to 1. Heng prognostic risk group and percentage of sarcomatoid component did not influence outcome. CONCLUSION: Sunitinib shows efficacy in advanced renal tumors with sarcomatoid differentiation particularly in patients with good performance status. Appropriate patient selection and risk-directed treatment remains essential in this aggressive disease.
BACKGROUND:Renal tumors with sarcomatoid changes are aggressive malignancies with poor prognosis. Immunotherapy and chemotherapy have provided little benefit. The efficacy of treatments targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway is unclear because of the lack of clinical trial data and the small number of published series. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the clinical records of 23 consecutive patients with advanced sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma who were treated with sunitinib in our center. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, and response rate were evaluated. We also studied the effect on clinical outcome of performance status, prognostic risk group, and proportion of sarcomatoid component. RESULTS: Median OS was 15.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.0-21.2). Median progression-free survival was 5.7 months (95% CI, 3.2-12.6). Seven patients (30%) had an objective response, 5 patients (22%) had stable disease, and 11 (48%) had progressive disease. The median survival of the 13 (56.5%) patients with performance status of 0 to 1 was 20.9 months (95% CI, 9.7-63.3) whereas the medial survival of the 10 (43.5%) patients with performance status of 2 to 3 was 5.0 months (95% CI, 1.1-16.5). Objective responses were observed only among the 13 (56.5%) patients with performance status of 0 to 1. Heng prognostic risk group and percentage of sarcomatoid component did not influence outcome. CONCLUSION:Sunitinib shows efficacy in advanced renal tumors with sarcomatoid differentiation particularly in patients with good performance status. Appropriate patient selection and risk-directed treatment remains essential in this aggressive disease.
Authors: Cedric Lebacle; Aydin Pooli; Thomas Bessede; Jacques Irani; Allan J Pantuck; Alexandra Drakaki Journal: World J Urol Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Sarp K Keskin; Pavlos Msaouel; Kenneth R Hess; Kai-Jie Yu; Surena F Matin; Kanishka Sircar; Pheroze Tamboli; Eric Jonasch; Christopher G Wood; Jose A Karam; Nizar M Tannir Journal: J Urol Date: 2017-04-11 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Daniel P Nguyen; Antoni Vilaseca; Emily A Vertosick; Renato B Corradi; Karim A Touijer; Nicole E Benfante; Daniel D Sjoberg; Paul Russo Journal: World J Urol Date: 2015-07-28 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Srinivas K Tantravahi; Daniel Albertson; Archana M Agarwal; Sowmya Ravulapati; Austin Poole; Shiven B Patel; Jamil S Hawatmeh; Alli M Straubhar; Ting Liu; David D Stenehjem; Neeraj Agarwal Journal: J Oncol Date: 2015-01-20 Impact factor: 4.375