Literature DB >> 24559820

The practice of acupuncture and moxibustion to promote cephalic version for women with a breech presentation: implications for clinical practice and research.

C A Smith1, D Betts2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine what experienced acupuncture practitioners and researchers considered key aspects of treatment to promote cephalic version for women with a breech presentation, and to establish a treatment protocol through consensus to guide the self administration of moxa by pregnant women. METHODS AND
DESIGN: The Delphi method was used to seek the opinions of key informants. Sixteen English speaking international, Australian and New Zealand acupuncturists working in the area of pregnancy were invited to participate in the study. Participants were given a link to an online survey, and their views sought on treatment parameters guiding the treatment of breech presentation within a research setting.
RESULTS: Two rounds of the Delphi process were undertaken, 12 participants completed round one, and 10 completed round two. Eighty percent of participants agreed that moxa should commence between 34 and 35 weeks gestation. Ninety percent agreed to self administration of moxa by the woman, and use of smokeless and odourless sticks. Seventy percent agreed moxa should be applied for a minimum of 10 days, and be applied once a day for 30min. Monitoring safety was identified as an important outcome. Ninety percent agreed study clinical outcomes should assess side effects including burns, and maternal and foetal outcomes.
CONCLUSION: Findings from our study promote the clinical validity for a future research protocol, and highlight other areas for research to evaluate the role of acupuncture and moxibustion with normalising birth.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acupuncture; Moxibustion; Pregnancy

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24559820     DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2013.12.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Complement Ther Med        ISSN: 0965-2299            Impact factor:   2.446


  5 in total

Review 1.  The COMET Handbook: version 1.0.

Authors:  Paula R Williamson; Douglas G Altman; Heather Bagley; Karen L Barnes; Jane M Blazeby; Sara T Brookes; Mike Clarke; Elizabeth Gargon; Sarah Gorst; Nicola Harman; Jamie J Kirkham; Angus McNair; Cecilia A C Prinsen; Jochen Schmitt; Caroline B Terwee; Bridget Young
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 2.279

2.  Assessing effects of BL67 points stimulation on fetal heart rate parameters and fetal movements during nonstress test.

Authors:  Masume Pirhadi; Mahboube Valiani
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2017-06-05

3.  A Survey of Licensed Acupuncturists in the San Francisco Bay Area: Prevalence of Treating Oncology Patients.

Authors:  Donald Abrams; Michael McCulloch; Misha Cohen; Mike Liaw; Deborah Silverman; Carla Wilson
Journal:  Integr Cancer Ther       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.279

4.  Development of a core outcome set for effectiveness studies of breech birth at term (Breech-COS)-an international multi-stakeholder Delphi study: study protocol.

Authors:  Shawn Walker; Tisha Dasgupta; Andrew Shennan; Jane Sandall; Catey Bunce; Phoebe Roberts
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Developing a core outcome set for periodontal trials.

Authors:  Thomas J Lamont; Jan E Clarkson; David N J Ricketts; Peter A Heasman; Craig R Ramsay; Katie Gillies
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.