| Literature DB >> 24559264 |
Elainne Christine de Souza Gomes1, Onicio Batista Leal-Neto, Fernando José Moreira de Oliveira, Julyana Viegas Campos, Reinaldo Souza-Santos, Constança Simões Barbosa.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Manson's schistosomiasis continues to be a severe public health problem in Brazil, where thousands of people live under the risk of contracting this parasitosis. In the Northeast of Brazil, schistosomiasis has expanded from rural areas to the coast of Pernambuco State, where the intermediate host is Biomphalaria glabrata snails. This study aims at presenting situational analyses on schistosomiasis at the coastal locality of Porto de Galinhas, Pernambuco, Brazil, by determining the risk factors relating to its occurrence from the epidemiological and spatial perspectives.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24559264 PMCID: PMC3938904 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-101
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Figure 1Map of Porto de Galinhas, Ipojuca, Pernambuco state - Brazil. Fonte: Gomes ECS et al., 2011 [29].
Figure 2Spatial distribution of breeding sites and foci of in Porto de Galinhas, Ipojuca, Pernambuco - Brazil.
Occurrences of schistosomiasis cases and prevalence according to district, Porto de Galinhas, Ipojuca, Pernambuco, 2010
| Merepe III | 315 | 14 | 3.2 | 4.4 | 1.8 – 5.5 |
| Salinas* | 1263 | 259 | 59.7 | 20.6* | 54.9 – 64.3 |
| Socó* | 590 | 96 | 22.1 | 16.3* | 18.4 – 26.4 |
| Pantanal* | 291 | 40 | 9.2 | 13.7* | 6.7 – 12.4 |
| Vila de Porto | 241 | 16 | 3.7 | 6.6 | 2.2 – 6.0 |
| Total | 2700 | 425 | 97.9 | 15.7 | – |
*Frequency variation statistically significant (CI).
Socioeconomic, behavioural and environmental characteristics of the population sampled in Porto de Galinhas Ipojuca, Pernambuco 2010
| With piped water | 286 | 98.6 | 96.5 – 99.6 | 1.381 | 96.6 | 95.5 – 97.5 |
| Without piped water | 4 | 1.4 | 0.4 – 3.5 | 48 | 3.4 | 2.5 – 4.5 |
| No accumulation of water in backyard in winter | 89 | 30.7 | 25.4 – 36.3 | 591 | 41.4 | 38.8 – 44.0 |
| With accumulated water in backyard in winter | 201 | 69.3 | 63.7 – 74.6 | 838 | 58.6 | 56.0 – 61.2 |
| No accumulation of water in backyard in summer | 206 | 71.0 | 65.4 – 76.2 | 1.046 | 73.2 | 70.8 – 75.5 |
| With accumulated water in backyard in summer | 84 | 29.0 | 23.8 – 34.6 | 383 | 26.8 | 24.5 – 29.2 |
| Sewage disposal: general system | 6 | 2.1 | 0.8 – 4.4 | 51 | 3.6 | 2.7 – 4.7 |
| Sewage disposal: pit or open ditch | 284 | 97.9 | 95.6 – 99.2 | 1.378 | 96.4 | 95.3 – 97.3 |
| Head of family’s schooling: high school or university | 36 | 12.7 | 9.1 – 17.2 | 321 | 22.9 | 20.7 – 25.2 |
| Head of family’s schooling: illiterate or elementary school | 247 | 87.3 | 82.8 – 90.9 | 1.083 | 77.1 | 74.8 – 79.3 |
| Age group: 0–9 and > 60 years | 54 | 12.6 | 9.7 – 16.3 | 682 | 29.4 | 27.6 – 31.3 |
| Age group: 10–19 years | 99 | 23.2 | 19.3 – 27.5 | 384 | 16.6 | 15.1 – 18.2 |
| Age group: 20–39 years | 196 | 45.9 | 41.1 – 50.8 | 765 | 33.0 | 31.1 – 35.0 |
| Age group: 40–59 years | 78 | 18.3 | 14.8 – 22.3 | 487 | 21.0 | 19.4 – 22.7 |
| No. of family members in home: < 5 peoples | 164 | 56.6 | 50.6 – 62.3 | 886 | 62.0 | 59.4 – 64.5 |
| No. of family members in home: > 5 people | 126 | 43.4 | 37.7 – 49.4 | 543 | 38.0 | 35.5 – 40.6 |
| Not stepping in water when going out from home in winter | 34 | 11.7 | 8.3 – 16.0 | 298 | 20.9 | 18.8 – 23.1 |
| Stepping in water when going out from home in winter | 256 | 88.3 | 84.0 – 91.7 | 1.131 | 79.1 | 76.9 – 81.2 |
| Not stepping in water when going out from home in summer | 223 | 76.9 | 71.6 – 81.6 | 1.132 | 79.2 | 77.0 – 81.3 |
| Stepping in water when going out from home in summer | 67 | 23.1 | 18.4 – 28.4 | 297 | 20.8 | 18.7 – 23.0 |
| Living in asphalted street | 61 | 21.0 | 16.5 – 26.2 | 480 | 33.6 | 31.2 – 36.1 |
| Not living in asphalted street | 229 | 79.0 | 73.8 – 83.5 | 949 | 66.4 | 63.9 – 68.8 |
| Family income: > 1 minimum monthly salary | 208 | 71.7 | 66.2 – 76.8 | 1.166 | 81.6 | 79.5 – 83.6 |
| Family income: < 1 minimum monthly salary | 82 | 28.3 | 23.2 – 33.8 | 263 | 18.4 | 16.4 – 20.5 |
| Female sex | 175 | 40.3 | 35.7 – 45.1 | 1.270 | 54.7 | 52.6 – 56.7 |
| Male sex | 259 | 59.7 | 54.9 – 64.3 | 1.053 | 45.3 | 43.3 – 47.4 |
| Length of time living at locality: < 1 year | 5 | 1.7 | 0.6 – 4.0 | 58 | 4.1 | 3.1 – 5.3 |
| Length of time living at locality: > 1 year | 285 | 98.3 | 96.0 – 99.4 | 1.371 | 95.9 | 94.7 – 96.9 |
Results of multivariate logistic regression
| With accumulated water in backyard in winter | 1.40 | 1.06 – 1.88 | 0.020 |
| Head of family’s schooling: illiterate or elementary school | 1.62 | 1.11 – 2.42 | 0.015 |
| Age group: 10–19 years | 2.35 | 1.53 – 3.65 | 0.000 |
| Age group: 20–39 years | 2.89 | 1.98 – 4.28 | 0.000 |
| Age group: 40–59 years | 2.02 | 1.30 – 3.16 | 0.002 |
| Not living in asphalted street | 1.57 | 1.14 – 2.17 | 0.006 |
| Family income: < 1 minimum monthly salary | 1.46 | 1.07 – 1.98 | 0.017 |
| Male sex | 1.71 | 1.31 – 2.24 | 0.000 |
AIC 1441.9.
Figure 3Maps showing real and potential spatial risk of schistosomiasis transmission, Porto de Galinhas, Ipojuca, Pernambuco - Brazil. (A) Kernel map of parasite load per household X breeding sites and foci of Biomphalaria glabrata; (B) Buffer map of the distance between the foci of Biomphalaria glabrata.
Figure 4Maps showing spatial sweep analysis on schistosomiasis cases in 2010, Porto de Galinhas, Ipojuca, Pernambuco - Brazil (Bernoulli’s method – SaTScan software).
Figure 5Environmental changes in the identified area of risk in the sweep analysis on schistosomiasis cases 2010, Porto de Galinhas, Ipojuca – Brazil.