Literature DB >> 24559236

EMS spinal precautions and the use of the long backboard - resource document to the position statement of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma.

Chelsea C White, Robert M Domeier, Michael G Millin.   

Abstract

Field spinal immobilization using a backboard and cervical collar has been standard practice for patients with suspected spine injury since the 1960s. The backboard has been a component of field spinal immobilization despite lack of efficacy evidence. While the backboard is a useful spinal protection tool during extrication, use of backboards is not without risk, as they have been shown to cause respiratory compromise, pain, and pressure sores. Backboards also alter a patient's physical exam, resulting in unnecessary radiographs. Because backboards present known risks, and their value in protecting the spinal cord of an injured patient remains unsubstantiated, they should only be used judiciously. The following provides a discussion of the elements of the National Association of EMS Physicians (NAEMSP) and American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (ACS-COT) position statement on EMS spinal precautions and the use of the long backboard. This discussion includes items where there is supporting literature and items where additional science is needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24559236     DOI: 10.3109/10903127.2014.884197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care        ISSN: 1090-3127            Impact factor:   3.077


  15 in total

1.  Removal of the Long Spine Board From Clinical Practice: A Historical Perspective.

Authors:  Francis X Feld
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 2.  Prehospital care of spinal injuries: a historical quest for reasoning and evidence.

Authors:  J G Ten Brinke; S R Groen; M Dehnad; T P Saltzherr; M Hogervorst; J C Goslings
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Best Practices and Current Care Concepts in Prehospital Care of the Spine-Injured Athlete in American Tackle Football March 2-3, 2019; Atlanta, GA.

Authors:  Ron Courson; James Ellis; Stanley A Herring; Barry P Boden; Glenn Henry; Darryl Conway; Lance McNamara; Timothy L Neal; Margot Putukian; Allen K Sills; Kimberly P Walpert
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Rapid Extrication versus the Kendrick Extrication Device (KED): Comparison of Techniques Used After Motor Vehicle Collisions.

Authors:  Joshua Bucher; Frank Dos Santos; Danny Frazier; Mark A Merlin
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2015-04-29

Review 5.  The Norwegian guidelines for the prehospital management of adult trauma patients with potential spinal injury.

Authors:  Daniel K Kornhall; Jørgen Joakim Jørgensen; Tor Brommeland; Per Kristian Hyldmo; Helge Asbjørnsen; Thomas Dolven; Thomas Hansen; Elisabeth Jeppesen
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Maintaining immobilisation devices on trauma patients during CT: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Pål Johan Stokkeland; Erlend Andersen; Maria Myhre Bjørndal; Arne Morten Mikalsen; Sindre Aslaksen; Per Kristian Hyldmo
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 7.  Prehospital care for traumatic spinal cord injury by first responders in 8 sub-Saharan African countries and 6 other low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review.

Authors:  Zachary J Eisner; Peter G Delaney; Patricia Widder; Ilyas S Aleem; Denise G Tate; Krishnan Raghavendran; John W Scott
Journal:  Afr J Emerg Med       Date:  2021-06-06

Review 8.  Development of a new Emergency Medicine Spinal Immobilization Protocol for trauma patients and a test of applicability by German emergency care providers.

Authors:  Michael Kreinest; Bernhard Gliwitzky; Svenja Schüler; Paul A Grützner; Matthias Münzberg
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2016-05-14       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  Confirmation of suboptimal protocols in spinal immobilisation?

Authors:  Mark Dixon; Joseph O'Halloran; Ailish Hannigan; Scott Keenan; Niamh M Cummins
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 2.740

10.  Effect of spineboard and headblocks on the image quality of head CT scans.

Authors:  Baukje Hemmes; Cécile R L P N Jeukens; Aliaa Al-Haidari; Paul A M Hofman; Ed S Vd Linden; Peter R G Brink; Martijn Poeze
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2016-04-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.