Literature DB >> 24558201

Predictive factors for the outcome of allogeneic transplantation in patients with MDS stratified according to the revised IPSS-R.

Matteo G Della Porta1, Emilio Paolo Alessandrino, Andrea Bacigalupo, Maria Teresa van Lint, Luca Malcovati, Cristiana Pascutto, Michele Falda, Massimo Bernardi, Francesco Onida, Stefano Guidi, Anna Paola Iori, Raffaella Cerretti, Paola Marenco, Pietro Pioltelli, Emanuele Angelucci, Rosi Oneto, Francesco Ripamonti, Paolo Bernasconi, Alberto Bosi, Mario Cazzola, Alessandro Rambaldi.   

Abstract

Approximately one-third of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are cured by this treatment. Treatment failure may be due to transplant complications or relapse. To identify predictive factors for transplantation outcome, we studied 519 patients with MDS or oligoblastic acute myeloid leukemia (AML, <30% marrow blasts) who received an allogeneic HSCT and were reported to the Gruppo Italiano Trapianto di Midollo Osseo registry between 2000 and 2011. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards regression. High-risk category, as defined by the revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R), and monosomal karyotype were independently associated with relapse and lower overall survival after transplantation. On the other hand, older recipient age and high hematopoietic cell transplantation-comorbidity index (HCT-CI) were independent predictors of nonrelapse mortality. Accounting for various combinations of patient's age, IPSS-R category, monosomal karyotype, and HCT-CI, the 5-year probability of survival after allogeneic HSCT ranged from 0% to 94%. This study indicates that IPSS-R risk category and monosomal karyotype are important factors predicting transplantation failure both in MDS and oligoblastic AML. In addition, it reinforces the concept that allogeneic HSCT offers optimal eradication of myelodysplastic hematopoiesis when the procedure is performed before MDS patients progress to advanced disease stages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24558201     DOI: 10.1182/blood-2013-12-542720

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  52 in total

1.  Validation of WHO classification-based Prognostic Scoring System (WPSS) for myelodysplastic syndromes and comparison with the revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R). A study of the International Working Group for Prognosis in Myelodysplasia (IWG-PM).

Authors:  M G Della Porta; H Tuechler; L Malcovati; J Schanz; G Sanz; G Garcia-Manero; F Solé; J M Bennett; D Bowen; P Fenaux; F Dreyfus; H Kantarjian; A Kuendgen; A Levis; J Cermak; C Fonatsch; M M Le Beau; M L Slovak; O Krieger; M Luebbert; J Maciejewski; S M M Magalhaes; Y Miyazaki; M Pfeilstöcker; M A Sekeres; W R Sperr; R Stauder; S Tauro; P Valent; T Vallespi; A A van de Loosdrecht; U Germing; D Haase; P L Greenberg; M Cazzola
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 2.  Stem cell therapy for neurological disorders: A focus on aging.

Authors:  Hung Nguyen; Sydney Zarriello; Alexandreya Coats; Cannon Nelson; Chase Kingsbury; Anna Gorsky; Mira Rajani; Elliot G Neal; Cesar V Borlongan
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 5.996

3.  Cytogenetics, donor type, and use of hypomethylating agents in myelodysplastic syndrome with allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Betul Oran; Piyanuch Kongtim; Uday Popat; Marcos de Lima; Elias Jabbour; Xinyan Lu; Julien Chen; Gabriella Rondon; Partow Kebriaei; Sairah Ahmed; Borje Andersson; Amin Alousi; Stefan Ciurea; Elizabeth Shpall; Richard E Champlin
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  A post-transplant optimized transplant-specific risk score in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Mahasweta Gooptu; John Koreth
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 9.941

5.  Long-term follow-up of a retrospective comparison of reduced-intensity conditioning and conventional high-dose conditioning for allogeneic transplantation from matched related donors in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  R Martino; A Henseler; M van Lint; N Schaap; J Finke; D Beelen; S Vigouroux; E P Alessandrino; G J Mufti; J H Veelken; B Bruno; I Yakoub-Agha; L Volin; J Maertens; R Or; V Leblond; M Rovira; P Kalhs; A F Alvarez; A Vitek; J Sierra; E Wagner; M Robin; T de Witte; N Kröger
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 6.  Which lower risk myelodysplastic syndromes should be treated with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation?

Authors:  Marie Robin; Pierre Fenaux
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 11.528

7.  Stem cell transplants for myelodysplastic syndromes: refining the outcome predictions.

Authors:  Austin John Barrett
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 8.  Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for MDS and CMML: recommendations from an international expert panel.

Authors:  Theo de Witte; David Bowen; Marie Robin; Luca Malcovati; Dietger Niederwieser; Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha; Ghulam J Mufti; Pierre Fenaux; Guillermo Sanz; Rodrigo Martino; Emilio Paolo Alessandrino; Francesco Onida; Argiris Symeonidis; Jakob Passweg; Guido Kobbe; Arnold Ganser; Uwe Platzbecker; Jürgen Finke; Michel van Gelder; Arjan A van de Loosdrecht; Per Ljungman; Reinhard Stauder; Liisa Volin; H Joachim Deeg; Corey Cutler; Wael Saber; Richard Champlin; Sergio Giralt; Claudio Anasetti; Nicolaus Kröger
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 9.  Molecular Data and the IPSS-R: How Mutational Burden Can Affect Prognostication in MDS.

Authors:  Aziz Nazha; Rafael Bejar
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.952

10.  Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Outcomes in Monosomal Karyotype Myeloid Malignancies.

Authors:  Marcelo C Pasquini; Mei-Jie Zhang; Bruno C Medeiros; Philippe Armand; Zhen-Huan Hu; Taiga Nishihori; Mahmoud D Aljurf; Görgün Akpek; Jean-Yves Cahn; Mitchell S Cairo; Jan Cerny; Edward A Copelan; Abhinav Deol; César O Freytes; Robert Peter Gale; Siddhartha Ganguly; Biju George; Vikas Gupta; Gregory A Hale; Rammurti T Kamble; Thomas R Klumpp; Hillard M Lazarus; Selina M Luger; Jane L Liesveld; Mark R Litzow; David I Marks; Rodrigo Martino; Maxim Norkin; Richard F Olsson; Betul Oran; Attaphol Pawarode; Michael A Pulsipher; Muthalagu Ramanathan; Ran Reshef; Ayman A Saad; Wael Saber; Bipin N Savani; Harry C Schouten; Olle Ringdén; Martin S Tallman; Geoffrey L Uy; William A Wood; Baldeep Wirk; Waleska S Pérez; Minoo Batiwalla; Daniel J Weisdorf
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.