Peter R Kornaat1, Samuel K Van de Velde. 1. Samuel K. Van de Velde, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands. svandevelde@post.harvard.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The clinical significance of an incidental finding of bone marrow edema (BME) on MRI in professional runners is poorly understood. PURPOSE: To investigate the prevalence and clinical and radiological progression of BME lesions in professional runners who consider themselves to be asymptomatic. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Sixteen athletes (13 men and 3 women; mean age, 22.9 ± 2.7 years) were recruited from the Dutch National Committee middle-distance and long-distance running selection. All athletes had been injury free for the year before the study. Magnetic resonance imaging scans were obtained before the start of the season and at the end of the season. Both pubic bones, hips, knees, and ankles were scanned in a single session. Preseason and postseason Lysholm scores were obtained. RESULTS: Fourteen of the 16 athletes had BME lesions before the start of the season (45 BME lesions in total). Most BME lesions (69%; 31/45) were located in the ankle joint and foot. More than half of the lesions (58%; 26/45) fluctuated during the season, with new lesions occurring (20%; 9/45) and old lesions disappearing (22%; 10/45). The few clinical complaints that occurred throughout the season were not related to the presence of BME lesions. CONCLUSION: Almost all asymptomatic athletes showed BME lesions, with more than half of the lesions fluctuating during the season. These data suggest that the incidental finding of a BME lesion on MRI of professional runners should not immediately be related to clinical complaints or lead to an altered training program.
BACKGROUND: The clinical significance of an incidental finding of bone marrow edema (BME) on MRI in professional runners is poorly understood. PURPOSE: To investigate the prevalence and clinical and radiological progression of BME lesions in professional runners who consider themselves to be asymptomatic. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Sixteen athletes (13 men and 3 women; mean age, 22.9 ± 2.7 years) were recruited from the Dutch National Committee middle-distance and long-distance running selection. All athletes had been injury free for the year before the study. Magnetic resonance imaging scans were obtained before the start of the season and at the end of the season. Both pubic bones, hips, knees, and ankles were scanned in a single session. Preseason and postseason Lysholm scores were obtained. RESULTS: Fourteen of the 16 athletes had BME lesions before the start of the season (45 BME lesions in total). Most BME lesions (69%; 31/45) were located in the ankle joint and foot. More than half of the lesions (58%; 26/45) fluctuated during the season, with new lesions occurring (20%; 9/45) and old lesions disappearing (22%; 10/45). The few clinical complaints that occurred throughout the season were not related to the presence of BME lesions. CONCLUSION: Almost all asymptomatic athletes showed BME lesions, with more than half of the lesions fluctuating during the season. These data suggest that the incidental finding of a BME lesion on MRI of professional runners should not immediately be related to clinical complaints or lead to an altered training program.
Entities:
Keywords:
bone bruise; bone marrow edema (BME); elite runner; marathon; running
Authors: Christian Lattermann; Cale A Jacobs; Emily K Reinke; Erica A Scaramuzza; Laura J Huston; Warren R Dunn; Kurt P Spindler Journal: Cartilage Date: 2016-07-08 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Nicola Relph; Henrike Greaves; Ross Armstrong; Trevor D Prior; Sally Spencer; Ian B Griffiths; Paola Dey; Ben Langley Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2022-08-22
Authors: Fabian Proft; Mathias Grunke; Christiane Reindl; Markus A Schramm; Felix Mueller; Maximilian Kriegmair; Jan Leipe; Peter Weinert; Hendrik Schulze-Koops; Matthias Witt Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2016-07-11 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Vipul Mandalia; Craig Williams; Jonathan Kosy; Kate Brown; Peter Schranz; Andrew Redfern; David Silver; Roy Powell Journal: Indian J Orthop Date: 2020-02-28 Impact factor: 1.251