Literature DB >> 24557685

Quantitative quality control during urodynamic studies with TVRs for cystometry in men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Limin Liao1, Werner Schaefer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To establish typical value ranges (TVRs) and to outline their role in urodynamic quality control.
METHODS: Five hundred and eighty-two data sets of free flow, filling cystometry, and voiding from 181 males in a strictly quality-controlled study were analyzed for intravesical pressure (Pves), abdominal pressure (Pabd), and detrusor pressure (Pdet) before, at the beginning and end of filling, and after voiding. Cystometric capacity, maximum flow rate (Qmax), voided volume (Vvoid), and compliance were determined. Mean value, standard deviation, median, and various TVRs were calculated. Technical errors related to the TVRs are classified and examples given.
RESULTS: TVRs for initial resting Pves, Pabd, and Pdet were 31-42, 28-39, and 0-4 cmH₂O, respectively. Various technical errors are classified as type I: normal initial Pdet, both Pves and Pabd are incorrect; type II: negative initial Pdet; and type III: initial Pdet too high. The incidences of I, II, and III errors were 9.8, 4.5, and 1.4%, respectively. The TVRs for maximum cystometric capacity and compliance were 157-345 mL and 26.7-70.8 mL/cmH₂O; Qmax, Pdet, and Vvoid were 5.5-9 mL/s, 57-92 cmH₂O, and 167-315 mL, respectively; Qmax and Vvoid in free flow were 8-9.2 mL/s and 167-301 mL, respectively. After voiding, two errors were found: type V (Pves and Pdet after voiding still high) and type VI (Pves and Pdet negative).
CONCLUSIONS: TVRs in urodynamics are indispensable and effective tools for quantitative plausibility checks and quality control. They are sensitive and reliable indicators for correct measurement and a relevant contribution to a collection of normal values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24557685     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-014-0668-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  13 in total

Review 1.  Urodynamic protocol and central review of data for clinical trials in lower urinary tract dysfunction.

Authors:  P Lewis; P Abrams
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society.

Authors:  Paul Abrams; Linda Cardozo; Magnus Fall; Derek Griffiths; Peter Rosier; Ulf Ulmsten; Philip van Kerrebroeck; Arne Victor; Alan Wein
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.696

3.  Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies.

Authors:  Werner Schäfer; Paul Abrams; Limin Liao; Anders Mattiasson; Francesco Pesce; Anders Spangberg; Arthur M Sterling; Norman R Zinner; Philip van Kerrebroeck
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.696

4.  Quality control in urodynamics: a review of urodynamic traces from one centre.

Authors:  J Sullivan; P Lewis; S Howell; T Williams; A M Shepherd; P Abrams
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Urodynamic features and artefacts.

Authors:  Stephen Hogan; Andrew Gammie; Paul Abrams
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 2.696

6.  Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies on interaction between bladder compliance and outflow obstruction in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Li-Min Liao; Werner Schaefer
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2006-08-04       Impact factor: 3.285

7.  Interrater reliability of filling cystometrogram interpretation in a multicenter study.

Authors:  P Zimmern; C W Nager; M Albo; M P Fitzgerald; S McDermott
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Process for development of multicenter urodynamic studies.

Authors:  Charles W Nager; Michael E Albo; Mary P Fitzgerald; Susan M McDermott; Stephen Kraus; Holly E Richter; Philippe Zimmern
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Effects of retrospective quality control on pressure-flow data with computer-based urodynamic systems from men with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Li-Min Liao; Werner Schaefer
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.285

10.  Reference urodynamic values for stress incontinent women.

Authors:  C W Nager; M E Albo; M P Fitzgerald; S McDermott; L Wruck; S Kraus; N Howden; P Norton; L Sirls; E Varner; P Zimmern
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.696

View more
  4 in total

1.  Head-to-head comparison of pressures during full cystometry, with clinical as well as in-depth signal-analysis, of air-filled catheters versus the ICS-standard water-filled catheters.

Authors:  Peter F W M Rosier
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2021-08-07       Impact factor: 2.367

2.  Typical Value Ranges and Typical Signal Patterns in the Initial Cough in Patients With Neurogenic Bladder: Quality Control in Urodynamic Studies.

Authors:  Tianji Lu; Limin Liao
Journal:  Int Neurourol J       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 2.835

Review 3.  Evaluation and Management of Neurogenic Bladder: What Is New in China?

Authors:  Limin Liao
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  A Randomized, Open-Label, Comparative Study of Efficacy and Safety of Tolterodine Combined with Tamsulosin or Doxazosin in Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

Authors:  Yanwei Cao; Yonghua Wang; Lei Guo; Xuecheng Yang; Tao Chen; Haitao Niu
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2016-06-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.