UNLABELLED: Porto-pulmonary hypertension (POPH), once considered an absolute contraindication for liver transplantation (LT), has become a more accepted indication because of the evolution of treatment with prostacyclin analogues, phosphodiesterase inhibitors and endothelin receptor antagonists. An exception model for end stage liver disease (MELD) score of 22 is assigned to candidates with documentation of effective treatment. We examined the post-transplant outcomes of patients who received LT for POPH with exception. METHODS: Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data on 34,318 adult (≥ 18 years) deceased donor LT recipients transplanted between March 1, 2002 and August 31, 2010 were reviewed. The diagnosis of POPH was ascertained from MELD exception forms. Patients were followed from the time of transplant until the earlier occurrence of death or end of the follow-up period. Cox regression was used to evaluate the predictors of post-LT mortality and graft failure. RESULTS: During the study period, 34,318 patients received deceased donor LT. Seventy eight out of 34,318 patients were transplanted for POPH with MELD exception. The 1-year adjusted risks of patient death and graft failure for patients transplanted under exception rules for POPH were significantly higher than with POPH adult recipients who did not receive exception points (death:hazard ratio [HR] = 2.25, p = 0.005 and graft failure HR = 1.96, p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: This study of national data suggests that treated POPH continues to be associated with inferior early post-transplant outcomes.
UNLABELLED: Porto-pulmonary hypertension (POPH), once considered an absolute contraindication for liver transplantation (LT), has become a more accepted indication because of the evolution of treatment with prostacyclin analogues, phosphodiesterase inhibitors and endothelin receptor antagonists. An exception model for end stage liver disease (MELD) score of 22 is assigned to candidates with documentation of effective treatment. We examined the post-transplant outcomes of patients who received LT for POPH with exception. METHODS: Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data on 34,318 adult (≥ 18 years) deceased donor LT recipients transplanted between March 1, 2002 and August 31, 2010 were reviewed. The diagnosis of POPH was ascertained from MELD exception forms. Patients were followed from the time of transplant until the earlier occurrence of death or end of the follow-up period. Cox regression was used to evaluate the predictors of post-LT mortality and graft failure. RESULTS: During the study period, 34,318 patients received deceased donor LT. Seventy eight out of 34,318 patients were transplanted for POPH with MELD exception. The 1-year adjusted risks of patientdeath and graft failure for patients transplanted under exception rules for POPH were significantly higher than with POPH adult recipients who did not receive exception points (death:hazard ratio [HR] = 2.25, p = 0.005 and graft failure HR = 1.96, p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: This study of national data suggests that treated POPH continues to be associated with inferior early post-transplant outcomes.
Authors: Michael Halank; Stephan Miehlke; Gert Hoeffken; Alexander Schmeisser; Matthias Schulze; Ruth H Strasser Journal: Transplantation Date: 2004-06-15 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Richard B Freeman; Robert G Gish; Ann Harper; Gary L Davis; John Vierling; Leslie Lieblein; Goran Klintmalm; Jamie Blazek; Robert Hunter; Jeffrey Punch Journal: Liver Transpl Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 5.799
Authors: N Sussman; V Kaza; N Barshes; R Stribling; J Goss; C O'Mahony; E Zhang; J Vierling; A Frost Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2006-06-22 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: K V Narayanan Menon; Scott L Nyberg; William S Harmsen; Nelson F DeSouza; Charles B Rosen; Ruud A F Krom; Russell H Wiesner Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: David M Dickinson; Paula C Bryant; M Christian Williams; Gregory N Levine; Shiqian Li; James C Welch; Berkeley M Keck; Randall L Webb Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2004 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: M Ashfaq; S Chinnakotla; L Rogers; K Ausloos; S Saadeh; G B Klintmalm; M Ramsay; G L Davis Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2007-02-07 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Michael J Krowka; Richard N Channick; Hilary M DuBrock; David S Goldberg; Norman L Sussman; Sonja D Bartolome; Zakiyah Kadry; Reena J Salgia; David C Mulligan; Walter K Kremers; Steven M Kawut Journal: Transplantation Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Arun Jose; Shimul A Shah; Nadeem Anwar; Courtney R Jones; Kenneth E Sherman; Jean M Elwing Journal: Liver Transpl Date: 2021-06-29 Impact factor: 6.112
Authors: Bingsong Huang; Yi Shi; Jun Liu; Paul M Schroder; Suxiong Deng; Maogen Chen; Jun Li; Yi Ma; Ronghai Deng Journal: BMC Gastroenterol Date: 2018-06-07 Impact factor: 3.067
Authors: Jungchan Park; Myung Soo Park; Ji-Hye Kwon; Ah Ran Oh; Seung-Hwa Lee; Gyu-Seong Choi; Jong Man Kim; Keoungah Kim; Gaab Soo Kim Journal: Anesth Pain Med (Seoul) Date: 2021-10-29