Literature DB >> 24557340

The value of platinum agents as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Fausto Petrelli1, Andrea Coinu, Karen Borgonovo, Mary Cabiddu, Mara Ghilardi, Veronica Lonati, Sandro Barni.   

Abstract

Platinum agents such as cisplatin and carboplatin are DNA-damaging agents with activity in breast cancer (BC), particularly in the triple negative (TN) subgroup. The utility of platinum agents, in addition to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), is controversial. To assess the activity of platinum agents in patients with TNBC treated with NAC, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all published studies. A search of PubMed, EMBASE, the Web of Science, SCOPUS, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was performed to identify studies that investigated platinum-based NAC in patients with TNBC. Random effect models were adopted to estimate the summary risk ratio (RR), and the publication bias was evaluated using a funnel plot and Egger's regression asymmetry test. The primary endpoints were the pooled rate of the pathologic complete response (pCR) and the RR to obtain a pCR in patients treated versus not treated with NAC containing platinum agents. 28 studies were included (six randomized controlled trials and 22 retrospective or prospective studies) for a total of 1,598 TNBC patients. Overall, the pooled rate of pCR in patients treated with platinum-based NAC was 45 %. In randomized trials, NAC containing cisplatin or carboplatin significantly increased the rate of pCR compared with nonplatinum agents (RR = 1.45, 95 % CI 1.25-1.68; P < 0.0001). Compared with non-TN, TNBCs were associated with a threefold increase in the pCR rate when treated with platinum-based NAC (RR 3.32, 95 % CI 2.39-4.61; P < 0.0001). In conclusion, pCR rates increase significantly with the addition of cisplatin or carboplatin in TNBC compared with NAC containing no platinum drugs. TN status is a predictor of benefit from platinum-based NAC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24557340     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-014-2876-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  53 in total

Review 1.  Management of locally advanced breast cancer-perspectives and future directions.

Authors:  Konstantinos Tryfonidis; Elzbieta Senkus; Maria J Cardoso; Fatima Cardoso
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 2.  Molecular Classification and Future Therapeutic Challenges of Triple-negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Nikolaos Garmpis; Christos Damaskos; Anna Garmpi; Konstantinos Nikolettos; Dimitrios Dimitroulis; Evangelos Diamantis; Paraskevi Farmaki; Alexandros Patsouras; Errika Voutyritsa; Athanasios Syllaios; Constantinos G Zografos; Efstathios A Antoniou; Nikos Nikolettos; Alkiviadis Kostakis; Konstantinos Kontzoglou; Dimitrios Schizas; Afroditi Nonni
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations and treatment strategies for breast cancer.

Authors:  Inês Godet; Daniele M Gilkes
Journal:  Integr Cancer Sci Ther       Date:  2017-02-27

Review 4.  Epidemiology, biology, and treatment of triple-negative breast cancer in women of African ancestry.

Authors:  Abenaa M Brewster; Mariana Chavez-MacGregor; Powel Brown
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Pathological Response and Survival in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Carboplatin plus Docetaxel.

Authors:  Priyanka Sharma; Sara López-Tarruella; José Angel García-Saenz; Qamar J Khan; Henry L Gómez; Aleix Prat; Fernando Moreno; Yolanda Jerez-Gilarranz; Agustí Barnadas; Antoni C Picornell; María Del Monte-Millán; Milagros González-Rivera; Tatiana Massarrah; Beatriz Pelaez-Lorenzo; María Isabel Palomero; Ricardo González Del Val; Javier Cortés; Hugo Fuentes-Rivera; Denisse Bretel Morales; Iván Márquez-Rodas; Charles M Perou; Carolyn Lehn; Yen Y Wang; Jennifer R Klemp; Joshua V Mammen; Jamie L Wagner; Amanda L Amin; Anne P O'Dea; Jaimie Heldstab; Roy A Jensen; Bruce F Kimler; Andrew K Godwin; Miguel Martín
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Prediction of pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using machine learning models in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Ji-Yeon Kim; Eunjoo Jeon; Soonhwan Kwon; Hyungsik Jung; Sunghoon Joo; Youngmin Park; Se Kyung Lee; Jeong Eon Lee; Seok Jin Nam; Eun Yoon Cho; Yeon Hee Park; Jin Seok Ahn; Young-Hyuck Im
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Predictors of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage II and III breast cancer: The impact of chemotherapeutic regimen.

Authors:  Iheoma Y Nwaogu; Oluwadamilola M Fayanju; Donna B Jeffe; Julie A Margenthaler
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-06-10

8.  Monitoring Serum VEGF in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A New Strategy for Early Prediction of Treatment Response and Patient Survival.

Authors:  Ruo-Xi Wang; Sheng Chen; Liang Huang; Ying Zhou; Zhi-Ming Shao
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-08-20

Review 9.  Breast cancer under age 40: a different approach.

Authors:  D Ribnikar; J M Ribeiro; D Pinto; B Sousa; A C Pinto; E Gomes; E C Moser; M J Cardoso; F Cardoso
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2015-04

10.  Different apoptotic effects of [Pt(O,O'-acac)(γ-acac)(DMS)] and cisplatin on normal and cancerous human epithelial breast cells in primary culture.

Authors:  Carla Vetrugno; Antonella Muscella; Francesco Paolo Fanizzi; Luca Giulio Cossa; Danilo Migoni; Sandra Angelica De Pascali; Santo Marsigliante
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 8.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.