OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate observer detection and volume measurement of small irregular solid artificial pulmonary nodules on 64-MDCT in an anthropomorphic thoracic phantom. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty in-house-made solid pulmonary nodules (lobulated and spiculated; actual volume, 5.1-88.4 mm3; actual CT densities, -51 to 157 HU) were randomly placed inside an anthropomorphic thoracic phantom with pulmonary vasculature. The phantom was examined on two 64-MDCT scanners, using a scan protocol as applied in lung cancer screening. Two independent blinded observers screened for pulmonary nodules. Nodule volume was evaluated semiautomatically using dedicated software and was compared with the actual volume using an independent-samples t test. The interscanner and interobserver agreement of volumetry was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: Observer detection sensitivity increased along with increasing size of irregular nodules. Sensitivity was 100% when the actual volume was at least 69 mm3, regardless of specific observer, scanner, nodule shape, and density. Overall, nodule volume was underestimated by (mean±SD) 18.9±11.8 mm3 (39%±21%; p<0.001). The relative interscanner difference of volumetry was 3.3% (95% CI, -33.9% to 40.4%). The relative interobserver difference was 0.6% (-33.3% to 34.5%). CONCLUSION: Small irregular solid pulmonary nodules with an actual volume of at least 69 mm3 are reliably detected on 64-MDCT. However, CT-derived volume of those small nodules is largely underestimated, with considerable variation.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate observer detection and volume measurement of small irregular solid artificial pulmonary nodules on 64-MDCT in an anthropomorphic thoracic phantom. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty in-house-made solid pulmonary nodules (lobulated and spiculated; actual volume, 5.1-88.4 mm3; actual CT densities, -51 to 157 HU) were randomly placed inside an anthropomorphic thoracic phantom with pulmonary vasculature. The phantom was examined on two 64-MDCT scanners, using a scan protocol as applied in lung cancer screening. Two independent blinded observers screened for pulmonary nodules. Nodule volume was evaluated semiautomatically using dedicated software and was compared with the actual volume using an independent-samples t test. The interscanner and interobserver agreement of volumetry was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: Observer detection sensitivity increased along with increasing size of irregular nodules. Sensitivity was 100% when the actual volume was at least 69 mm3, regardless of specific observer, scanner, nodule shape, and density. Overall, nodule volume was underestimated by (mean±SD) 18.9±11.8 mm3 (39%±21%; p<0.001). The relative interscanner difference of volumetry was 3.3% (95% CI, -33.9% to 40.4%). The relative interobserver difference was 0.6% (-33.3% to 34.5%). CONCLUSION: Small irregular solid pulmonary nodules with an actual volume of at least 69 mm3 are reliably detected on 64-MDCT. However, CT-derived volume of those small nodules is largely underestimated, with considerable variation.
Authors: Matthias Eberhard; Daniel Stocker; Gianluca Milanese; Katharina Martini; Thi Dan Linh Nguyen-Kim; Moritz C Wurnig; Thomas Frauenfelder; Stephan Baumueller Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 2.895