Literature DB >> 24555314

Dispersal and the design of effective management strategies for plant invasions: matching scales for success.

Cameron S Fletcher1, David A Westcott2.   

Abstract

Dispersal of propagules makes invasions a fundamentally spatial phenomenon, and to be effective, management actions to control or eradicate invasive species must take this spatial structure into account. While there is a vibrant literature linking detailed dispersal measurements to the rate of invasive spread, and a separate literature focused on incorporating management into invasive models in order to improve the control of weeds, there are relatively fewer manuscripts incorporating state-of-the-art dispersal modeling and management modeling together to provide on-ground recommendations for structuring effective management. In this paper, we perform a generalized analysis of a spatially explicit, individual-based simulation model of invasion management with empirically determined dispersal processes, illustrated with the example of Miconia calvescens in the Australian Wet Tropics rain forest, to explore how matching the spatial scale of management to the spatial scale of the dispersal processes underpinning invasion influences the success of management. We find that management strategies designed to maximize the number of weeds removed from the management region, either in the first year of management or over longer periods, provide a poor estimate of the spatial scale of management that maximizes the probability of eradication. We show that achieving a goal of certainty of eradication requires exceeding a minimal spatial scale of management and total management resourcing. We generalize these results to examine how the spatial scale of dispersal drives the spatial scale of effective management strategies. These results show that to be effective, management of dispersal-driven invasions must occur at spatial scales determined by the scale of dispersal processes, and resourced accordingly. It illustrates how those scales might be calculated for a specific case for which detailed dispersal data are available and generalizes the result to highlight how dispersal scale drives the scale of effective management. The results highlight the importance of understanding the ecological drivers of invasion to structure effective management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24555314     DOI: 10.1890/12-2059.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  5 in total

1.  Managing breaches of containment and eradication of invasive plant populations.

Authors:  Cameron S Fletcher; David A Westcott; Helen T Murphy; Anthony C Grice; John R Clarkson
Journal:  J Appl Ecol       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 6.528

2.  Body size and substrate type modulate movement by the western Pacific crown-of-thorns starfish, Acanthaster solaris.

Authors:  Morgan S Pratchett; Zara-Louise Cowan; Lauren E Nadler; Ciemon F Caballes; Andrew S Hoey; Vanessa Messmer; Cameron S Fletcher; David A Westcott; Scott D Ling
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Spatial mismatch analysis among hotspots of alien plant species, road and railway networks in Germany and Austria.

Authors:  Yanina Benedetti; Federico Morelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Environmental resistance and habitat quality influence dispersal of the saltwater crocodile.

Authors:  Yusuke Fukuda; Craig Moritz; Namchul Jang; Grahame Webb; Hamish Campbell; Keith Christian; Garry Lindner; Sam Banks
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 6.622

5.  Assessing drivers of localized invasive spread to inform large-scale management of a highly damaging insect pest.

Authors:  Gabriela C Nunez-Mir; Jonathan A Walter; Kristine L Grayson; Derek M Johnson
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2022-02-20       Impact factor: 6.105

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.