Literature DB >> 24554978

Re-assessment of 30-, 60- and 90-day mortality rates in non-metastatic prostate cancer patients treated either with radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy.

Jens Hansen1, Giorgio Gandaglia2, Marco Bianchi2, Maxine Sun3, Michael Rink4, Zhe Tian3, Malek Meskawi3, Quoc-Dien Trinh5, Shahrokh F Shariat6, Paul Perrotte6, Felix K-H Chun7, Markus Graefen8, Pierre I Karakiewicz9.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: It is customary to consider deaths that occur within 90 days of surgery as caused by that surgery. However, such practice may overestimate the true short-term mortality rates after radical prostatectomy (RP). Indeed, treatment-unrelated events might affect short-term mortality rates. We assess RP-specific excess short-term mortality.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of a population-based cohort of 59 010 patients (RP = 28 281 and external beam radiation therapy [EBRT] as reference group, n = 30 729) who were treated between 1998 and 2005 for non-metastatic prostate cancer. Using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, we assessed the rates of 30-, 60- and 90-day mortality after either RP or EBRT.
RESULTS: Within the cohort, 30-, 60- and 90-day mortality rates were 0.2, 0.5 and 0.6%, and 0.1, 0.4 and 0.6% for RP and EBRT patients, respectively. This resulted in overall 30-, 60, and 90- day mortality differences of 0.1, 0.1 and 0%, respectively. After stratification according to age and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), the magnitude of these differences increased up to 3.2% in favour of EBRT in patients aged >75 years with CCI ≥2. In multivariable analysis, rates of 30-, 60- and 90- day mortality were 5.2-, 1.8- and 1.3-fold higher after RP than EBRT, respectively. Our study is limited by its non-randomized design.
CONCLUSION: Overall, absolute short-term mortality rates after RP are comparable to those of EBRT. The difference decreases over time: 90 days <60 days <30 days. Nonetheless, their magnitude is far from trivial in the elderly and sickest patients.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 24554978      PMCID: PMC3926930          DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.749

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN: 1911-6470            Impact factor:   1.862


  17 in total

1.  Overview of the SEER-Medicare data: content, research applications, and generalizability to the United States elderly population.

Authors:  Joan L Warren; Carrie N Klabunde; Deborah Schrag; Peter B Bach; Gerald F Riley
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Early and late perioperative outcomes following radical cystectomy: 90-day readmissions, morbidity and mortality in a contemporary series.

Authors:  C J Stimson; Sam S Chang; Daniel A Barocas; John E Humphrey; Sanjay G Patel; Peter E Clark; Joseph A Smith; Michael S Cookson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Reporting complications after open radical retropubic prostatectomy using the Martin criteria.

Authors:  Björn Löppenberg; Joachim Noldus; Alexander Holz; Rein Jüri Palisaar
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Mortality after major surgery for urologic cancers in specialized urology hospitals: are they any better?

Authors:  Badrinath R Konety; Veerasathpurush Allareddy; Sanjukta Modak; Brian Smith
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Rethinking 30-day mortality risk after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Shabbir M H Alibhai; Marc Leach; George Tomlinson; Murray D Krahn; Neil Fleshner; Gary Naglie
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Locally advanced prostate cancer: a population-based study of treatment patterns.

Authors:  William T Lowrance; Elena B Elkin; David S Yee; Andrew Feifer; Behfar Ehdaie; Lindsay M Jacks; Coral L Atoria; Michael J Zelefsky; Howard I Scher; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Examining the location and cause of death within 30 days of radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Shabbir M H Alibhai; Marc Leach; George Tomlinson
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  Survival associated with treatment vs observation of localized prostate cancer in elderly men.

Authors:  Yu-Ning Wong; Nandita Mitra; Gary Hudes; Russell Localio; J Sanford Schwartz; Fei Wan; Chantal Montagnet; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-12-13       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Thirty-day mortality rates and cumulative survival after radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  P I Karakiewicz; M Bazinet; A G Aprikian; S Tanguay; M M Elhilali
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Patient outcomes and length of hospital stay after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: analysis of hospital episodes statistics for England.

Authors:  Andrew Judge; Simon Evans; David J Gunnell; Peter C Albertsen; Julia Verne; Richard M Martin
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2007-09-03       Impact factor: 5.588

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  [Removal of the primary tumor in hematogenous metastatic tumor disease: reasons against].

Authors:  J Huber; C Groeben; M P Wirth
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  [Localized intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer].

Authors:  S Tritschler; U Ganswindt; C G Stief
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Early Mortality of Prostatectomy vs. Radiotherapy as a Primary Treatment for Prostate Cancer: A Population-Based Study From the United States and East Germany.

Authors:  Daniel Medenwald; Dirk Vordermark; Christian T Dietzel
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 6.244

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.