Camila Oliveira Vasconcelos1, Zirlane C Branco Coêlho1, Cristina de Souza Chaves1, Clarissa Romero Teixeira2, Margarida M Lima Pompeu1, Maria Jania Teixeira1. 1. Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Ceará, 60430-160FortalezaCE, Brazil, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Rua Alexandre Baraúna 949, 60430-160 Fortaleza, CE, Brazil. 2. Vector Molecular Biology Section, Laboratory of Malaria and Vector Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, RockvilleMaryland, USA, Vector Molecular Biology Section, Laboratory of Malaria and Vector Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Abstract
Recruitment of a specific cell population after Leishmania infection can influence the outcome of the disease. Cellular migration in response to Leishmania or vector saliva has been reported in air pouch model, however, cellular migration induced by Leishmania associated with host's blood and vector saliva in this model has not been described. Herein we investigated cellular migration into air pouch of hamster after stimulation with combination of L. chagasi and host's blood and Lutzomyia longipalpis saliva. Migration induced by saliva was 3-fold more than those induced by L. chagasi alone. Additionally, L. chagasi associated with blood and saliva induced significantly even more leukocytes into air pouch than Leishmania alone. L. chagasi recruited a diverse cell population; however, most of these cells seem to have not migrated to the inflammatory exudate, remaining in the pouch lining tissue. These results indicate that L. chagasi can reduce leukocyte accumulation to the initial site of infection, and when associated with vector saliva in the presence of blood components, increase the influx of more neutrophils than macrophages, suggesting that the parasite has developed a strategy to minimize the initial inflammatory response, allowing an unlimited progression within the host. This work reinforces the importance of studies on the salivary components of sand fly vectors of leishmaniasis in the transmission process and the establishment of the infection.
Recruitment of a specific cell population after Leishmania infection can influence the outcome of the disease. Cellular migration in response to Leishmania or vector saliva has been reported in air pouch model, however, cellular migration induced by Leishmania associated with host's blood and vector saliva in this model has not been described. Herein we investigated cellular migration into air pouch of hamster after stimulation with combination of L. chagasi and host's blood and Lutzomyia longipalpis saliva. Migration induced by saliva was 3-fold more than those induced by L. chagasi alone. Additionally, L. chagasi associated with blood and saliva induced significantly even more leukocytes into air pouch than Leishmania alone. L. chagasi recruited a diverse cell population; however, most of these cells seem to have not migrated to the inflammatory exudate, remaining in the pouch lining tissue. These results indicate that L. chagasi can reduce leukocyte accumulation to the initial site of infection, and when associated with vector saliva in the presence of blood components, increase the influx of more neutrophils than macrophages, suggesting that the parasite has developed a strategy to minimize the initial inflammatory response, allowing an unlimited progression within the host. This work reinforces the importance of studies on the salivary components of sand fly vectors of leishmaniasis in the transmission process and the establishment of the infection.
In the New World, visceral leishmaniasis is caused by protozoan parasites of
the genus Leishmania (L. chagasi, synonymous
L. infantum) and transmitted by the female phlebotomine sand fly,
Lutzomyia longipalpis, during blood repast. To obtain a blood meal,
sand flies locate blood by introducing their mouthparts into the skin, tearing tissues,
lacerating capillaries and creating hemorrhagic pools upon which they feed[26]. During this process, salivary gland contents are injected together with
Leishmania promastigotes into the host's skin[32]. In an attempt to probe and feed sand flies must first circumvent the host's
homeostatic system, and the innate and acquired immune responses[2]. It has been well documented that to overcome these obstacles, sand flies evolved
within their salivary secretion an array of potent pharmacological components, such as
anticoagulants, anti-platelet, vasodilators and, importantly, immunomodulator and
anti-inflammatory molecules[2].Analysis of early promastigote-host cell interactions indicates that after
inoculation of Leishmania into the dermis, the promastigotes interact
rapidly with serum components. Metacyclic promastigotes of Leishmania
have been shown to activate complement in both classical and alternative pathways[7]. After C3 opsonization, promastigotes undergo an immune adherence reaction and
bind to CR1 erythrocyte receptors[9]. Opsonization of Leishmania metacyclic promastigotes with
complement is rapid and lysis, via the membrane, attack complex (C5b-C9 complex) that
begins 60 s after serum contact[7]. This results in efficient killing of approximately 90% of all inoculated
parasites within a few minutes. Upon encounter of macrophages, parasites bind to CR3 on
their surface that facilitates the uptake of parasites into their main host cell[11].It has also known that cell number and composition of the cellular infiltrate
in the initial stages after infection greatly influences innate immune response and the
development of acquired immune response. Along gradients of C3a and C5a and several
chemokines, such as MIP-1β and MIP-2, inflammatory cells, monocytes/macrophages and
polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMN) migrate to the inoculation site in the skin[31]. Once in the dermis, Leishmania can penetrate granulocytes, and
macrophages or dendritic cells[13,24,25]. Macrophages are the reservoir cells for parasite replication and regulate the
infection by their ability to potentially phagocytose and kill the parasite if it can
avoid Leishmania-mediated functional inhibition[21]. Neutrophils and eosinophils possess leishmanicidal activity that restrains
parasite progression at the initial step of the infection[13,24]. However, it was demonstrated that Leishmania can survive
transiently within neutrophils5, and following infection with
Leishmania, the lifespan of neutrophils can be increased to two
days, through the inhibition of procaspases processing in the infected cells[1].Here, we investigated the cell number and composition in the initial response
to infection induced by L. chagasi combined or not with the host's
blood or saliva from Lu. longipalpis in hamster employing an air pouch
model of inflammation. There are same reports using this model, but only in mice, where
the authors evaluated the cellular recruitment induced by L. major and
L. donovani
15, or by L. braziliensis
30, as well as reports of Lu. longipalpis saliva in
macrophage recruitment29, and the chemotactic effects of Lu.
intermedia combined or not with L. braziliensis
[18]. However, migration of cells induced by L. infantum chagasi
associated with host's blood and Lu. longipalpis saliva in the hamster
model has not been described. The hamster air pouch model was chosen here because it is
the animal model for visceral leishmaniasis that best mimics the various aspects of
human disease[17].The complex microenvironment where the parasite, vector saliva, and the
host's blood components encounter for the first time can determine the outcome of
infection. The description of the initial inflammatory response is important especially
when the three major components, parasite, saliva and blood, are analyzed together.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animals and study design: Two-month-old Syrian hamsters
(Mesocricetus auratus) of both sexes were obtained from the central
animal facility of Departamento de Patologia e Medicina Legal of Universidade Federal do
Ceará (DPML/UFC), and held under specific pathogen-free conditions. For the experiments,
the animals were divided in the following groups (15 to 30 animals per group): Group 1,
inoculated with saline sterile; Group 2, inoculated with L. chagasi;
Group 3, inoculated with the heparinized blood collected from each animal; Group 4,
inoculated with vector saliva; Group 5, inoculated with L. chagasi
associated with heparinized blood; Group 6, inoculated with L. chagasi
associated with vector saliva; and Group 7, inoculated with L. chagasi
associated with heparinized blood and vector saliva. The Animal Care and Utilization
Committee from UFC approved all experimental procedures (process No. 029/2008).Parasite culture:
L. infantum chagasi (MHOM/BR/BA-262) promastigotes were grown in
Schneider's Drosophila medium (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) at 25 °C
supplemented with 20% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, 200 U/mL of
penicillin and 200 g/mL streptomycin (all from Sigma-Aldrich), and 2% sterile human
urine. The infectivity of parasites was maintained with regular passage through
hamsters, and for use in the experiments, parasites were expanded for several days to
reach stationary growth phase.Sand fly salivary glands: Salivary glands of females of Lu.
longipalpis (Jacobina strain) were obtained from Jesus G. Valenzuela,
Laboratory of Malaria and Vector Research (LMVR), Vector Molecular Biology Section
(NIAID-NIH), USA. Twenty females of Lu. longipalpis reared at LMVR
(NIAID-NIH) were used for dissection of salivary glands 5-8 days post-eclosion; salivary
glands were dissected and stored in sterile PBS (pH 7.4) at -70 °C. To obtain the
homogenate, salivary glands were disrupted by ultra-sonication and the supernatant
collected after centrifugation at 15,000 g for two minutes. Salivary glands were
lyophilized in groups of 10 pairs. Each 10 pairs of glands were resuspended with sterile
distilled water and before the use were diluted in sterile saline in the concentration
of one pair of gland per injection.Air pouch and Air pouches were
induced on the back of anesthetized hamsters (5-6 animals per group for each time) by
injection of 5 mL of sterile air, as described elsewhere19, and immediately
inoculated with 100 µL either one of the following stimuli (all prepared in
endotoxin-free saline): endotoxin-free saline alone; stationary-phase L.
chagasi promastigotes (107 parasites); salivary gland of
Lu. longipalpis (equivalent to one pair of salivary glands/animal);
heparinized blood collected from the animal itself; L. chagasi plus
heparinized blood; L. chagasi plus salivary gland; or L.
chagasi plus heparinized blood and salivary gland. One hundred to 150 µL of
blood of each animal was obtained via orbital plexus after light anesthesia with
ketamine and xylazine at the moment of the experiment, and used to inoculate the animal
itself. The number of leukocytes present in the blood was determined in a Neubauer
hemocytometer before inoculation (each 100 µL of blood injected contained 40-50 x
104 cells). After 6, 12 and 24 h, animals were lethally anesthetized, and
the pouches washed with a total of 10 mL of endotoxin-free saline to collect leukocytes
from the exudates. Lavage fluids (approximately 6 to 8 mL) were washed, and cell pellets
were resuspended in saline plus 10% BSA, stained in Turk's solution, and counted in a
Neubauer hemocytometer. Cells were cytoadhered to glass slides using Shandon cytospin2
and stained with hematoxylin and eosin to determine proportions of
monocytes/macrophages, neutrophils, eosinophils, basophils, and lymphocytes. In all
stimuli with blood, the cell values that were determined at 12 h were subtracted from
the values of the cells found in the blood that was injected initially (average of 45 x
104 cells). The values of monocytes/macrophages, neutrophils, eosinophils,
basophils, and lymphocytes found in the experiments were also subtracted from normal
blood values found in hamsters. The viability of the cells obtained from the exudates
was verified by trypan blue exclusion (0.1%).Histological analysis: The pouches lining tissues were dissected and fixed
in 10% neutral buffered formalin. Tissues were mounted in paraffin blocks, sectioned at
5-µm intervals, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin for histological analysis. The
alterations were observed by analyzing 50 microscopic fields per section in the pouch
lining tissue, on two sections from each animal (four to five hamsters per group), using
a 40 x objective, taking into account the following parameters: hemorrhage, edema,
hyperemia and fibrin. Each parameter was evaluated according to the intensity of the
event through scores: 0 (absence), 1 (rare), 2 (moderate) and 3 (accentuated). Cellular
analysis was evaluated in five fields, using the increase of 1000 x. The population of
cells from each animal corresponds to the sum of the fields analyzed. The cellular
population observed was: macrophages, neutrophils, eosinophils, and lymphocytes.Statistical analysis Statistically significant differences of the results
were determined using nonparametric statistical tests: t-Student for comparisons between
two groups; one-way ANOVA for comparisons between three or more groups. Statistical
analysis and graphs were performed using GraphPad prism version 5.0 (GraphPad Software,
San Diego, USA). Values of p < 0.05 were considered significant.
RESULTS
Leukocyte recruitment in air pouch exudates
Leukocyte migration reached a maximal peak at 12 h after injection and then
declining over a 24-h period into the air pouch (Fig.
1A). L. chagasi and saliva induced significantly more cells
into air pouches at 12 h after stimulation when compared with saline (Fig. 1A). Of interest, migration induced by saliva
was 3-fold more than that induced by Leishmania alone (Fig. 1A). In relation to stimuli containing blood, is
noteworthy that the number of cells in the blood injected containing an average of 45 x
104 cells, while the number of cells collected after 12 h of blood
stimulation was 100 x 104 cells, which means that the number of cells that
migrated induced by blood was in fact 55 x 104 cells (Fig. 1A). This number of cells was greater than those induced by
L. chagasi or saline. Also, in Fig.
1B, the number of cells collected after 12 h of stimulation with
Leishmania plus blood and Leishmania associated
with blood and saliva was 144 x 104 cells and 250 x 104 cells,
respectively, meaning a real number of migration of 99 x 104 cells for
Leishmania plus blood, and 205 x 104 cells for
Leishmania plus saliva plus blood. These data were significant in
relation to stimulation with Leishmania alone. Interestingly,
L. chagasi associated with saliva resulted in a reduced cellular
migration, 55 x 104 cells (Fig. 1B),
when compared with stimulation with saliva alone (76 x 104 cells) (Fig. 1A).
Fig. 1
Number of leukocytes accumulating in air pouch exudate in response to
(A)
L. chagasi, blood, or Lu. longipalpis saliva;
(B)
L. chagasi plus blood, L. chagasi plus
Lu. longipalpis saliva, or L. chagasi plus
blood and plus Lu. longipalpis saliva. Air pouches were raised
on the backs of male hamsters. One milliliter of endotoxin-free saline,
L. chagasi (107 promastigotes), salivary gland
of Lu. longipalpis (one pair of salivary glands/animal);
blood; L. chagasi plus blood; L. chagasi plus
salivary gland; or L. chagasi plus blood and salivary gland
were injected into pouches, and exudate was collected at 6, 12, and 24 h after
inoculation. Leukocytes were enumerated microscopically. Data are mean ± SE of
5 hamsters. (A) *p < 0.05, Leishmania- or
blood- or saliva-stimulated hamster vs. saline-stimulated hamster. (B)
**p < 0.05, Leishmania plus blood- or
Leishmania plus blood plus saliva- stimulated hamster vs.
Leishmania-stimulated hamster. The data are representative
of three independent experiments.
Types of cells that migrated in air pouch exudates: All stimuli induced
migration of a mixed population of leukocytes with a predominance of neutrophils at 12 h
(Fig. 2A and 2B). Neutrophils migration induced by saliva was more expressive than that
induced in response to blood, L. chagasi or saline at 12 h after
stimulation (Fig. 2A). Saliva also induced a
considerable number of eosinophils after 12 h, as compared to all stimuli (Fig. 2A). L. chagasi associated to
saliva was a great inducer of cell migration into the exudate; however the combination
of L. chagasi with blood and saliva was even better inducer of all the
types of cell to the inflammatory site (Fig. 2B).
This combination induced migration of a large number of neutrophils and macrophages as
compared to L. chagasi alone, and L. chagasi plus
saliva (Fig. 2B).
Fig. 2
Total number of neutrophils, macrophages, eosinophils, and lymphocytes
accumulated in air pouches in response to (A)
L. chagasi, Lu. longipalpis saliva, or blood;
(B)
L. chagasi, L. chagasi plus blood, L
chagasi plus Lu. longipalpis saliva, or
L.chagasi plus blood plus saliva, at 12 h after
stimulation. Stimulations were done as described in the legend to Figure 1. Exudate were placed onto
microscope slides by use of cytospin and stained with Diff-Quik solution;
proportion of neutrophils, macrophages, eosinophils, and lymphocytes/200 cells
were enumerated and relative cell numbers were calculated from total exudate
leukocytes. Data are mean ± SE of five hamsters. Differences observed for
neutrophils, and macrophages in Leishmania-, saliva-, and
blood-inoculated hamsters were significant (p < 0.05; n =
5), compared with saline control. Differences observed for eosinophils in
Leishmania-, and saliva-inoculated hamsters were
significant (p < 0.05; n = 5), compared with saline
control. The data are representative of three independent experiments.
Types of cells that migrated in the pouch lining tissue: Macrophages were
the predominant cell type at 12 h and 24 h post-stimulation in the pouch lining tissue,
followed by neutrophils. It was observed significantly almost 4-fold more macrophages
than neutrophils at 12 h after stimulation by L. chagasi (Fig. 3A), however after 24h macrophages number
decreased while neutrophils almost doubled (Fig.
3B). L. chagasi associated with blood or L.
chagasi plus blood plus saliva induced similarly cell migration at 12 h and
24 h post-stimulation (Fig. 3A and 3B). The combination of L. chagasi
with blood and saliva showed that the number of neutrophils dropped considerably after
24h, while the number of macrophages did not change (Fig.
3B). After 12 h of stimulation with L. chagasi and saliva was
possible to observe a smaller number of cells in the pouch lining tissue, as compared
with other stimuli, also showing a virtual absence of neutrophils and presence of a
small number of eosinophils, however, 24 h after stimulation with L.
chagasi associated with saliva, there was a slight increase in macrophages
(Fig. 4B).
Fig. 3
Number of leukocytes accumulating in the pouch lining tissue in response to
L. chagasi, L. chagasi plus blood,
L chagasi plus Lu. longipalpis saliva, or
L.chagasi plus blood plus saliva at 12 h (A)
or 24 h (B) after inoculation. Stimulations were done as described
in the legend to Figure 1, and the
pouches lining tissues were dissected at 12 and 24 h after inoculation. The
data were obtained by analyzing 50 microscopic fields per section in the pouch
lining tissue, on two sections from each animal and from five hamsters per
group, using a 100 x objective. The cellular population observed was:
macrophages, neutrophils, eosinophils, and lymphocytes. (A) *p
< 0.05 (neutrophils: L. chagasi plus blood- or L.
chagasi plus saliva plus blood-stimulated hamster vs. L.
chagasi-stimulated hamster); **p < 0.05
(macrophages: L. chagasi- or L. chagasi plus
blood- or L. chagasi plus saliva plus blood-stimulated hamster
vs. L. chagasi plus saliva-stimulated hamster). (B)
*p < 0.05 (eosinophil: L.
chagasi-stimulated hamster vs. L. chagasi plus blood-
or L. chagasi plus saliva or L. chagasi plus
saliva plus blood-stimulated hamster. The data are representative of three
independent experiments.
Fig. 4
Inflammatory scores in the pouch lining tissue at 12 h of stimulation with
(A)
L. chagasi, saline, blood, or Lu. longipalpis
saliva; (B)
L. chagasi, L. chagasi plus blood,
L.chagasi plus saliva, or L. chagasi plus
blood plus saliva. Stimulations were done as described in the legend to Figure 1, and the pouches lining tissues
were dissected at 12 and 24 h after inoculation. The data were obtained by
analyzing 50 microscopic fields per section in the pouch lining tissue, on two
sections from each animal and from five hamsters per group, using a 40 x
objective. Inflammatory scores: 0 (absence), 1 (rare), 2 (moderate) and 3
(accentuated).
Histopathological findings in the pouch lining tissue: All stimuli alone presented a slight edema and hyperemia (Fig. 4A). Edema and hyperemia also appeared in all
groups with association of stimuli, ranging from rare to moderate (Fig. 4B). The major inflammatory changes were
observed when Leishmania was associated with blood and saliva (Fig. 4B). Hemorrhage was observed in a more
pronounced manner following stimulation with L. chagasi associated
with blood and saliva, when compared with other groups (Fig. 3B).
DISCUSSION
In this study we found that L. infantum chagasi proved to
be a poor inducer of cellular migration into air pouch exudate, although there was
migration of a diverse population of cells. The data observed in pouch lining tissue
suggest that most of these cells do not seem to have migrated to the inflammatory
exudate, remaining in lining tissue. Corroborating these findings, a study demonstrated
that infection with other viscerotropic species of Leishmania, such as
L. donovani, did not induce a strong recruitment of leukocytes in
the exudate[15]. Maybe one possible explanation to these findings is the fact that promastigotes
of Leishmania have a large quantity of lipophosphoglycan (LPG) on their
surface, which has potent inhibitory cell activity[33]. Studies have showed that LPG of L. donovani blocks expression
of E-selectin, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 on endothelial cells, suggesting the ability of
L. donovani to prevent transendothelial migration of monocytes[14]. Thus, it is possible that infection with viscerotropic
Leishmania parasites did not induce a strong recruitment of
leukocytes in the exudate because cells are recruited but can fail to migrate to air
punch exudate, suggesting the blockade of transendothelial cell migration. However, this
fact needs to be clarified with further studies.On the other hand, L. chagasi associated with blood and
saliva recruited more leukocytes than L. chagasi did alone.
Leishmania is an intracellular parasite that has adopted several
strategies to survive and to replicate inside the host, and saliva may represent one
such strategy, as has been suggested by several studies[2,10]. Herein we observed that sand fly saliva induces a significant influx of
leukocytes into air punch exudate. The chemotactic effect for leukocytes, mainly
macrophages, induced by sandy fly saliva was previously described in models of cell
migration in vitro with Lu. longipalpis saliva, and
other sand fly species as P. duboscq and P. papatasi
[10]. Other study suggests that Lu. longipalpis saliva induces an
important and diffuse inflammatory infiltrate characterized by neutrophils, eosinophils,
and macrophages which are observed after 48 h in the dermis of the ear of BALB/c mice
exposed to bites of uninfected sand flies[27]. Sand fly saliva has also been previously described as capable of exacerbating
L. majorinfection resulting from an increased production of Th2
cytokines due by P. papatasi saliva, indicating that saliva can
modulate the host immune response[16]. Other studies have shown that sand fly saliva modulates the response of
macrophages to a phenotype more permissive to the survival of
Leishmania
[30]. Sand fly saliva is also able to suppress NO, H2O2, and
antigen presentation by macrophages[20]. Maybe this anti-inflammatory activity of Lu. longipalpis saliva
may partly explain the inhibition that occurred in cell recruitment when saliva was
associated with Leishmania. Another explanation would be to consider
some sort of modulation of the inflammatory response made by parasites as a strategy to
increase your chance of survival in the animal model used in this study. It has been
reported that hamsters are more susceptible to all species of viscerotropic
Leishmania than mice17, the model used in all studies
cited above.Besides the effect observed with sand fly saliva,
Leishmania associated with blood also shown to have an important
role in modulating the inflammatory response, suggesting synergism between these
stimuli. Some studies have shown that inflammatory mediators present in blood may
regulate the initial inflammatory response that develop after infection with
Leishmania, particularly complement components. The complement
system exerts a strong selective pressure on the survival of the parasite, and most of
the parasites enter permissive monocytes rapidly to prevent their death[7]. Promastigotes opsonized by C3b bind to erythrocytes and are more readily
phagocytized by PMN and macrophages[9]. In humans, the serum cytotoxic activity against promastigotes is the major
effector mechanism during the initial invasion by Leishmania
[8,9]. The immune adherence of promastigotes can facilitate the progression of
infection by the transfer of parasites attached to red cells for blood phagocytes.
Activation of the classical complement pathway by Leishmania in the
deposition of C3 on the surface of parasites produces the C5 convertase that initiates
the lytic cascade with the death of the parasite[8]. Phagocytosis of promastigotes by host cells during this period allows the
Leishmania evade lysis by complement[7]. This is believed to be the most efficient mechanism of invasion of promastigotes
in the host. This fact can explain the importance of blood to carry a greater induction
of cells as a mechanism of escape and infection by Leishmania
promastigotes.Herein, L. chagasi was able to induce an inflammatory
response characterized by the influx of neutrophils, macrophages and eosinophils. In
addition, the association of Leishmania with blood and saliva induced
the recruitment of more cells than did L. chagasi alone. Previous works
demonstrated that Leishmania elicits the recruitment of a mixed
population of inflammatory cells that can vary between species and strains[14,29]. Neutrophils were the main cells recruited after the stimuli in air pouch
exudate, especially when L. chagasi was associated with saliva or blood
and saliva. Studies showed that PMN are the first leukocytes to appear at the site of
inflammation where they phagocytose the parasites, some of which are able to survive
within these first host cells[6,23,35]. Leishmania is able to delay apoptosis of neutrophils, a
mechanism that involves inhibition of caspase-3, which is known as an inducer of
apoptosis in PMN[1]. Parasites that are ingested but not killed by PMN, at this early stage, can
benefit from this early accumulation of neutrophils to the site of infection, as has
been shown for L. major
[28]. The influx of neutrophils in the first 24 h modifies the T cells response, via
IL-4 production, and the susceptibility to infection by L. major, by
developing a Th2 response[28]. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that Leishmania promastigotes
induce migration of PMN by releasing Leishmania chemotactic factor
(LCF), and that the coincubation of Leishmania com PMN inhibits the
chemokine CXCL10, suggesting that Leishmania inhibits the activity of
Th1 or NK cells and, consequently, interferes with the development of the protective
immune response35, which may facilitate its progression within the host.Also, the combination of L. chagasi with blood and saliva
was capable of inducing an influx of many eosinophils to air pouch exudate. Other
species of Leishmania such as L. major, L.
donovani and L. braziliensis are also able to induce
migration of eosinophils[15,30]. It is known that eosinophils, like neutrophils, are also able to phagocyte and
kill Leishmania
[13,24]. Eosinophils can also participate in the vasodilatation facilitating the blood
meal and at the same time creating an inhospitable environment for pathogens transmitted
by vector[4]. Sand fly saliva was also an important inducer of eosinophil migration to air
pouch. In dogs, inoculation of Lu. longipalpis saliva resulted in an
inflammatory response with the presence of an intense eosinophilia[22]. Eosinophils were also observed in the inflammatory process developed at the site
of immunization with recombinant 15 kDa protein from saliva of P.
papatasi
[34]. In studies of sand fly saliva was observed that the exacerbation of infection
has been linked to inhibition of production of Th1 cytokine and increased production of
Th2 cytokines caused by saliva from P. papatasi, indicating that
Lu. longipalpis saliva may have influenced the type of immune
response, since the saliva promotes the recruitment of eosinophils, possibly by the
production of eotaxin, a chemokine characteristic of the Th2 immune response[16]. The presence of eosinophils suggests a Th2 immune response induced by saliva of
the vector, and this type of response would facilitate the survival of
Leishmania in the early stage of infection.Macrophage was the second predominant cell type in air pouch exudate,
especially when the stimulus was with L. chagasi associated with blood
and saliva. In the early phase of infection, the ability of macrophages to respond to
activation signals of Th1 against intracellular pathogens is important in determining
proliferation or elimination of the parasite. The recruitment of a small number of
macrophages has been associated with smaller lesions in a model of immunodeficientmice[3]. The intracellular killing of Leishmania by macrophages depends
on the production of ROS and NO, as already shown[11]. The proportion of neutrophils and macrophages changes during the first weeks of
infection, and as expected, the number of neutrophils decreases soon with a concomitant
increase of macrophages. Studies by[15] showed that the number of macrophages increased approximately 50% after 48 h of
infection with L. donovani. In the present study, we observed that
macrophages were more predominant cells in the punch lining tissue than neutrophils at
12 h after stimulation with L. chagasi. As expected, the number of
neutrophils increased after 24 h of stimulation. However, in the pouch lining tissue
stimulated by L. chagasi associated with saliva and blood the
macrophages were the predominant cells with both 12 h and 24 h post-inoculation,
suggesting that these cells were recruited, but may not have migrated into punch
exudate, as discussed above, or actually migrated only later (after 24 h).Histopathological analysis in punch lining tissue showed
Leishmania associated with saliva and blood induced some important
inflammatory changes, although mild to moderate, such as edema, hyperemia, hemorrhage
and fibrin. Previous reports have showed that saliva from Lu.
intermedia could induce inflammatory changes such as edema and hyperemia in
the ear dermis of BALB/c[18]. The mild or moderate inflammation induced by L. chagasi in this
study also suggests the parasite has developed a strategy to minimize the initial
inflammatory response, allowing an unlimited progression within the host.More detailed studies of leukocyte populations that migrate to the initial
site of Leishmania inoculation, cytokine and chemokine production, as
well as characterization of cellular phenotype, can clarify new aspects involved in the
survival of L. chagasi in the host. This work reinforces the importance
of studies on the salivary components of sand fly vectors of leishmaniasis in the
transmission process and the establishment of the infection.
Authors: Francinaldo Silva; Regis Gomes; Deboraci Prates; José C Miranda; Bruno Andrade; Manoel Barral-Netto; Aldina Barral Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: K Müller; G van Zandbergen; B Hansen; H Laufs; N Jahnke; W Solbach; T Laskay Journal: Med Microbiol Immunol Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Nathan C Peters; Jackson G Egen; Nagila Secundino; Alain Debrabant; Nicola Kimblin; Shaden Kamhawi; Phillip Lawyer; Michael P Fay; Ronald N Germain; David Sacks Journal: Science Date: 2008-08-15 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Eresso Aga; Dörthe M Katschinski; Ger van Zandbergen; Helmut Laufs; Birgit Hansen; Kerstin Müller; Werner Solbach; Tamás Laskay Journal: J Immunol Date: 2002-07-15 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Clarissa R Teixeira; Claire da S Santos; Deboraci B Prates; Rafael T Dos Santos; Théo Araújo-Santos; Sebastião M de Souza-Neto; Valéria M Borges; Manoel Barral-Netto; Cláudia I Brodskyn Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2018-05-08 Impact factor: 5.640