Literature DB >> 24553555

Acute respiratory distress syndrome in wartime military burns: application of the Berlin criteria.

Slava M Belenkiy1, Allison R Buel, Jeremy W Cannon, Christy R Sine, James K Aden, Jonathan L Henderson, Nehemiah T Liu, Jonathan B Lundy, Evan M Renz, Andriy I Batchinsky, Leopoldo C Cancio, Kevin K Chung.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) prevalence and related outcomes in burned military casualties from Iraq and Afghanistan have not been described previously. The objective of this article was to report ARDS prevalence and its associated in-hospital mortality in military burn patients.
METHODS: Demographic and physiologic data were collected retrospectively on mechanically ventilated military casualties admitted to our burn intensive care unit from January 2003 to December 2011. Patients with ARDS were identified in accordance with the new Berlin definition of ARDS. Subjects were categorized as having mild, moderate, or severe ARDS. Multivariate logistic regression identified independent risk factors for developing moderate-to-severe ARDS. The main outcome measure was the prevalence of ARDS in a cohort of patients burned as a result of recent combat operations.
RESULTS: A total of 876 burned military casualties presented during the study period, of whom 291 (33.2%) required mechanical ventilation. Prevalence of ARDS in this cohort was 32.6%, with a crude overall mortality of 16.5%. Mortality increased significantly with ARDS severity: mild (11.1%), moderate (36.1%), and severe (43.8%) compared with no ARDS (8.7%) (p < 0.001). Predictors for the development of moderate or severe ARDS were inhalation injury (odds ratio [OR], 1.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-3.54; p = 0.046), Injury Severity Score (ISS) (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.07; p = 0.0021), pneumonia (OR, 198; 95% CI, 1.07-3.66; p = 0.03), and transfusion of fresh frozen plasma (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.01-1.72; p = 0.04). Size of burn was associated with moderate or severe ARDS by univariate analysis but was not an independent predictor of ARDS by multivariate logistic regression (p > 0.05). Age, size of burn, and moderate or severe ARDS were independent predictors of mortality.
CONCLUSION: In this cohort of military casualties with thermal injuries, nearly a third required mechanical ventilation; of those, nearly one third developed ARDS, and nearly one third of patients with ARDS did not survive. Moderate and severe ARDS increased the odds of death by more than fourfold and ninefold, respectively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiologic/prognostic study, level III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24553555     DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182aa2d21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg        ISSN: 2163-0755            Impact factor:   3.313


  14 in total

1.  Acute respiratory distress syndrome in burn patients: incidence and risk factor analysis.

Authors:  L Silva; L Garcia; B Oliveira; M Tanita; J Festti; L Cardoso; L Lavado; C Grion
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2016-09-30

2.  Prognosis value of Serum Cytokine levels among burn-induced ards patients.

Authors:  L N Nguyen; D H Tran; K H Dong
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2018-09-30

3.  Long-range stress transmission guides endothelial gap formation.

Authors:  C Corey Hardin; Joyjit Chattoraj; Greeshma Manomohan; Jader Colombo; Trong Nguyen; Dhananjay Tambe; Jeffrey J Fredberg; Konstantin Birukov; James P Butler; Emanuela Del Gado; Ramaswamy Krishnan
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2017-11-11       Impact factor: 3.575

4.  Acute respiratory distress syndrome among severe burn patients in a developing country: application result of the berlin definition.

Authors:  N N Lam; T D Hung; D K Hung
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2018-03-31

Review 5.  Combat Trauma-Related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Joseph C Broderick; Fabiola Mancha; Brit J Long; Joseph K Maddry; Kevin K Chung; Steven G Schauer
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2022-09-14

6.  Injury Characteristics and von Willebrand Factor for the Prediction of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Patients With Burn Injury: Development and Internal Validation.

Authors:  Majid Afshar; Ellen L Burnham; Cara Joyce; Robin Gagnon; Robert Dunn; Joslyn M Albright; Luis Ramirez; John E Repine; Giora Netzer; Elizabeth J Kovacs
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Risk factors for acute respiratory distress syndrome in severe burns: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Marcos T Tanita; Meriele M Capeletti; Tomás A Moreira; Renan P Petinelli; Lucienne T Q Cardoso; Cintia M C Grion
Journal:  Int J Burns Trauma       Date:  2020-02-15

8.  NETosis in the pathogenesis of acute lung injury following cutaneous chemical burns.

Authors:  Ranu Surolia; Fu Jun Li; Zheng Wang; Mahendra Kashyap; Ritesh Kumar Srivastava; Amie M Traylor; Pooja Singh; Kevin G Dsouza; Harrison Kim; Jean-Francois Pittet; Jaroslaw W Zmijewski; Anupam Agarwal; Mohammad Athar; Aftab Ahmad; Veena B Antony
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2021-05-24

9.  ECMO in major burn patients: feasibility and considerations when multiple modes of mechanical ventilation fail.

Authors:  Jason D Kennedy; Wesley Thayer; Reuben Beuno; Kelly Kohorst; Avinash B Kumar
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2017-06-20

10.  Low-Dose Heparin Anticoagulation During Extracorporeal Life Support for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Conscious Sheep.

Authors:  Nicolas J Prat; Andrew D Meyer; Thomas Langer; Robbie K Montgomery; Bijaya K Parida; Andriy I Batchinsky; Andrew P Cap
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.454

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.