Literature DB >> 24553062

Predictors of inhospital prognosis in acute pulmonary embolism: keeping it simple and effective!

Navin Agrawal1, Raghu T Ramegowda, Soumya Patra, Madhav Hegde, Ashish Agarwal, Vikram Kolhari, Kamal Gupta, Manjunath C Nanjappa.   

Abstract

The assessment of commonly available demographic, clinical, and easily calculable investigational parameters instead of the conventional complicated indices for prognosis in acute pulmonary embolism may help in triage in a simple and cost-effective way. Clinical, demographic, and investigational parameters were collected and utilized for the assessment of inhospital prognosis of acute pulmonary embolism in 200 consecutive patients admitted to our institute. Overall mortality was 18% and poor outcome at discharge was seen in another 18.5%. In univariate analysis, predominant presenting symptom of fatigue, sudden onset of symptoms, overt right ventricular failure, hypoxemia at admission, low SBP and DBP, coexistent pulmonary or cardiac illness, ECG evidence of right axis deviation, SIQ3T3 pattern, conduction blocks, echocardiographic evidence of right ventricular dysfunction, decreased inspiratory collapse of inferior vena cava, severe pulmonary arterial hypertension, visible thrombus in pulmonary artery, significant tricuspid regurgitation, computed tomographic evidence of total occlusion of major pulmonary arteries, diameter of main pulmonary artery, acute or chronic pulmonary embolism, renal and hepatic dysfunction, hyponatremia, hyperkalemia, troponin elevation, use of fibrin-specific agent, requirement of inotropic support, and mechanical ventilation were the variables found to significantly predict adverse outcome. In multivariate analysis, hypoxemia, no improvement after lysis, deranged liver function test, conduction blocks, and signs of right ventricular failure were the significant variables, while inotropic support requirement had a trend toward significance. Clinical, demographic, and routine investigational parameters help to risk-stratify the patients presenting with acute pulmonary embolism and to prognosticate and manage in a simpler yet effective way.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24553062     DOI: 10.1097/MBC.0000000000000093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis        ISSN: 0957-5235            Impact factor:   1.276


  4 in total

Review 1.  The value of electrocardiographic abnormalities in the prognosis of pulmonary embolism: a consensus paper.

Authors:  Geneviève C Digby; Piotr Kukla; Zhong-Qun Zhan; Carlos A Pastore; Ryszard Piotrowicz; Edgardo Schapachnik; Wojciech Zareba; Antonio Bayés de Luna; Piotr Pruszczyk; Adrian M Baranchuk
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 2.  The value of electrocardiography in prognosticating clinical deterioration and mortality in acute pulmonary embolism: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amro Qaddoura; Geneviève C Digby; Conrad Kabali; Piotr Kukla; Zhong-Qun Zhan; Adrian M Baranchuk
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 3.  Findings From 12-lead Electrocardiography That Predict Circulatory Shock From Pulmonary Embolism: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jacob D Shopp; Lauren K Stewart; Thomas W Emmett; Jeffrey A Kline
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 3.451

4.  Hyponatremia and 30 days mortality of patients with acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Babak Tamizifar; Saeid Kheiry; Farid Fereidoony
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.852

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.