Literature DB >> 24552691

Do we understand high-level vision?

David Daniel Cox1.   

Abstract

'High-level' vision lacks a single, agreed upon definition, but it might usefully be defined as those stages of visual processing that transition from analyzing local image structure to analyzing structure of the external world that produced those images. Much work in the last several decades has focused on object recognition as a framing problem for the study of high-level visual cortex, and much progress has been made in this direction. This approach presumes that the operational goal of the visual system is to read-out the identity of an object (or objects) in a scene, in spite of variation in the position, size, lighting and the presence of other nearby objects. However, while object recognition as a operational framing of high-level is intuitive appealing, it is by no means the only task that visual cortex might do, and the study of object recognition is beset by challenges in building stimulus sets that adequately sample the infinite space of possible stimuli. Here I review the successes and limitations of this work, and ask whether we should reframe our approaches to understanding high-level vision.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24552691     DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2014.01.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol        ISSN: 0959-4388            Impact factor:   6.627


  13 in total

1.  The receptive field is dead. Long live the receptive field?

Authors:  Adrienne Fairhall
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 2.  Principles of goal-directed spatial robot navigation in biomimetic models.

Authors:  Michael Milford; Ruth Schulz
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Nonlinear Processing of Shape Information in Rat Lateral Extrastriate Cortex.

Authors:  Giulio Matteucci; Rosilari Bellacosa Marotti; Margherita Riggi; Federica B Rosselli; Davide Zoccolan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Invariant visual object recognition and shape processing in rats.

Authors:  Davide Zoccolan
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-02       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  A conceptual framework of computations in mid-level vision.

Authors:  Jonas Kubilius; Johan Wagemans; Hans P Op de Beeck
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 2.380

6.  Object segmentation controls image reconstruction from natural scenes.

Authors:  Peter Neri
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 8.029

7.  Feedforward object-vision models only tolerate small image variations compared to human.

Authors:  Masoud Ghodrati; Amirhossein Farzmahdi; Karim Rajaei; Reza Ebrahimpour; Seyed-Mahdi Khaligh-Razavi
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 2.380

8.  A specialized face-processing model inspired by the organization of monkey face patches explains several face-specific phenomena observed in humans.

Authors:  Amirhossein Farzmahdi; Karim Rajaei; Masoud Ghodrati; Reza Ebrahimpour; Seyed-Mahdi Khaligh-Razavi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Object size determines the spatial spread of visual time.

Authors:  Corinne Fulcher; Paul V McGraw; Neil W Roach; David Whitaker; James Heron
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  The life-span trajectory of visual perception of 3D objects.

Authors:  Erez Freud; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.