BACKGROUND: Youth with histories of institutional/orphanage care are at increased risk for externalizing and internalizing problems during childhood and adolescence. Although these problems have been well described, the related adolescent behaviors of risk-taking and sensation-seeking have not yet been explored in this population. This study examined risk-taking and sensation-seeking propensity, and associations with conduct problems and depressive symptoms, in early adolescents who were adopted as young children from institutional care. METHODS: Risk-taking and sensation-seeking propensities of 12- and 13-year-old postinstitutionalized (PI; n = 54) adolescents were compared with two groups: youth who were internationally adopted early from foster care (PFC; n = 44) and nonadopted youth (NA; n = 58). Participants were recruited to equally represent pre/early- and mid/late-pubertal stages within each group. Participants completed the youth version of the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (Lejuez et al., ) and the Sensation-Seeking Scale for Children (Russo et al., ). Parents completed clinical ratings of participants' conduct problems and depressive symptoms. RESULTS: PI adolescents demonstrated lower risk-taking than PFC and NA peers. Pre/early-pubertal PI youth showed lower sensation-seeking, while mid/late-pubertal PI youth did not differ from other groups. PI adolescents had higher levels of conduct problems but did not differ from the other youth in depressive symptoms. In PI youth only, conduct problems were negatively correlated with risk-taking and positively correlated with sensation-seeking, while depressive symptoms were negatively correlated with both risk-taking and sensation-seeking. CONCLUSIONS: Early institutional care is associated with less risk-taking and sensation-seeking during adolescence. The deprived environment of an institution likely contributes to PI youth having a preference for safe choices, which may only be partially reversed with puberty. Whether this reflects hyporesponsiveness to rewards and how it relates to psychopathology are discussed.
BACKGROUND: Youth with histories of institutional/orphanage care are at increased risk for externalizing and internalizing problems during childhood and adolescence. Although these problems have been well described, the related adolescent behaviors of risk-taking and sensation-seeking have not yet been explored in this population. This study examined risk-taking and sensation-seeking propensity, and associations with conduct problems and depressive symptoms, in early adolescents who were adopted as young children from institutional care. METHODS: Risk-taking and sensation-seeking propensities of 12- and 13-year-old postinstitutionalized (PI; n = 54) adolescents were compared with two groups: youth who were internationally adopted early from foster care (PFC; n = 44) and nonadopted youth (NA; n = 58). Participants were recruited to equally represent pre/early- and mid/late-pubertal stages within each group. Participants completed the youth version of the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (Lejuez et al., ) and the Sensation-Seeking Scale for Children (Russo et al., ). Parents completed clinical ratings of participants' conduct problems and depressive symptoms. RESULTS: PI adolescents demonstrated lower risk-taking than PFC and NA peers. Pre/early-pubertal PI youth showed lower sensation-seeking, while mid/late-pubertal PI youth did not differ from other groups. PI adolescents had higher levels of conduct problems but did not differ from the other youth in depressive symptoms. In PI youth only, conduct problems were negatively correlated with risk-taking and positively correlated with sensation-seeking, while depressive symptoms were negatively correlated with both risk-taking and sensation-seeking. CONCLUSIONS: Early institutional care is associated with less risk-taking and sensation-seeking during adolescence. The deprived environment of an institution likely contributes to PI youth having a preference for safe choices, which may only be partially reversed with puberty. Whether this reflects hyporesponsiveness to rewards and how it relates to psychopathology are discussed.
Authors: C W Lejuez; Jennifer P Read; Christopher W Kahler; Jerry B Richards; Susan E Ramsey; Gregory L Stuart; David R Strong; Richard A Brown Journal: J Exp Psychol Appl Date: 2002-06
Authors: Sven C Mueller; Michael G Hardin; Katherine Korelitz; Teresa Daniele; Jessica Bemis; Mary Dozier; Elizabeth Peloso; Francoise S Maheu; Daniel S Pine; Monique Ernst Journal: Child Abuse Negl Date: 2012-03-15
Authors: Thomas J Crowley; Kristen M Raymond; Susan K Mikulich-Gilbertson; Laetitia L Thompson; Carl W Lejuez Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Charles H Zeanah; Helen L Egger; Anna T Smyke; Charles A Nelson; Nathan A Fox; Peter J Marshall; Donald Guthrie Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2009-06-01 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Kathryn L Humphreys; Steve S Lee; Eva H Telzer; Laurel J Gabard-Durnam; Bonnie Goff; Jessica Flannery; Nim Tottenham Journal: Dev Psychobiol Date: 2015-03-18 Impact factor: 3.038
Authors: Dominic S Fareri; Laurel Gabard-Durnam; Bonnie Goff; Jessica Flannery; Dylan G Gee; Daniel S Lumian; Christina Caldera; Nim Tottenham Journal: Dev Psychopathol Date: 2017-12
Authors: Max P Herzberg; Amanda S Hodel; Raquel A Cowell; Ruskin H Hunt; Megan R Gunnar; Kathleen M Thomas Journal: Neuropsychologia Date: 2018-08-28 Impact factor: 3.139
Authors: Karina Quevedo; Anna E Johnson; Michelle M Loman; Theresa Lafavor; Bao Moua; Megan R Gunnar Journal: Dev Psychobiol Date: 2015-03-13 Impact factor: 3.038
Authors: Megan R Gunnar; Carrie E DePasquale; Brie M Reid; Bonny Donzella; Bradley S. Miller Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2019-11-11 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Catalina Kopetz; Jacqueline I Woerner; Laura MacPherson; Carl W Lejuez; Charles A Nelson; Charles H Zeanah; Nathan A Fox Journal: J Exp Psychol Gen Date: 2018-09-17