OBJECTIVES: Many factors may influence choice of care setting for treatment of acute infections. The authors evaluated a national sample of U.S. outpatient clinic and emergency department (ED) visits for three common infections (urinary tract infection [UTI], skin and soft tissue infection [SSTI], and upper respiratory infection [URI]), comparing setting, demographics, and care. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of 2006-2010 data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Care Survey (NHAMCS) and National Ambulatory Care Survey (NAMCS). Patients age ≥ 18 years with primary diagnoses of UTI, URI, and SSTI were the visits of interest. Demographics, tests, and prescriptions were compared, divided by ED versus outpatient setting using bivariate statistics. RESULTS: Between 2006 and 2010, there were an estimated 40.9 million ambulatory visits for UTI, 168.3 million visits for URI, and 34.8 million visits for SSTI; 24% of UTI, 11% of URI, and 33% of SSTI visits were seen in EDs. Across all groups, ED patients were more commonly younger and black and had Medicaid or no insurance. ED patients had more blood tests (54% vs. 22% for UTI, 21% vs. 14% for URI, and 25% vs. 20% for SSTI) and imaging studies (31% vs. 9% for UTI, 27% vs. 8% for URI, and 16% vs. 5% for SSTI). Pain medications were more frequently used in the ED; over one-fifth of UTI and SSTI visits included narcotics. In both settings, greater than 50% of URI visits received antibiotics; more than 40% of UTI ED visits included broad-spectrum fluoroquinolones. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency departments treated a considerable proportion of U.S. ambulatory infections from 2006 to 2010. Patient factors, including the presence of acute pain and access to care, appear to influence choice of care setting. Observed antibiotic use in both settings suggests a need for optimizing antibiotic use.
OBJECTIVES: Many factors may influence choice of care setting for treatment of acute infections. The authors evaluated a national sample of U.S. outpatient clinic and emergency department (ED) visits for three common infections (urinary tract infection [UTI], skin and soft tissue infection [SSTI], and upper respiratory infection [URI]), comparing setting, demographics, and care. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of 2006-2010 data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Care Survey (NHAMCS) and National Ambulatory Care Survey (NAMCS). Patients age ≥ 18 years with primary diagnoses of UTI, URI, and SSTI were the visits of interest. Demographics, tests, and prescriptions were compared, divided by ED versus outpatient setting using bivariate statistics. RESULTS: Between 2006 and 2010, there were an estimated 40.9 million ambulatory visits for UTI, 168.3 million visits for URI, and 34.8 million visits for SSTI; 24% of UTI, 11% of URI, and 33% of SSTI visits were seen in EDs. Across all groups, ED patients were more commonly younger and black and had Medicaid or no insurance. ED patients had more blood tests (54% vs. 22% for UTI, 21% vs. 14% for URI, and 25% vs. 20% for SSTI) and imaging studies (31% vs. 9% for UTI, 27% vs. 8% for URI, and 16% vs. 5% for SSTI). Pain medications were more frequently used in the ED; over one-fifth of UTI and SSTI visits included narcotics. In both settings, greater than 50% of URI visits received antibiotics; more than 40% of UTI ED visits included broad-spectrum fluoroquinolones. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency departments treated a considerable proportion of U.S. ambulatory infections from 2006 to 2010. Patient factors, including the presence of acute pain and access to care, appear to influence choice of care setting. Observed antibiotic use in both settings suggests a need for optimizing antibiotic use.
Authors: Keith E Kocher; William J Meurer; Reza Fazel; Phillip A Scott; Harlan M Krumholz; Brahmajee K Nallamothu Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2011-08-11 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Kalpana Gupta; Thomas M Hooton; Kurt G Naber; Björn Wullt; Richard Colgan; Loren G Miller; Gregory J Moran; Lindsay E Nicolle; Raul Raz; Anthony J Schaeffer; David E Soper Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2011-03-01 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Jesse M Pines; Brent R Asplin; Amy H Kaji; Robert A Lowe; David J Magid; Maria Raven; Ellen J Weber; Donald M Yealy Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: David B Larson; Lara W Johnson; Beverly M Schnell; Shelia R Salisbury; Howard P Forman Journal: Radiology Date: 2010-11-29 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Catherine Liu; Arnold Bayer; Sara E Cosgrove; Robert S Daum; Scott K Fridkin; Rachel J Gorwitz; Sheldon L Kaplan; Adolf W Karchmer; Donald P Levine; Barbara E Murray; Michael J Rybak; David A Talan; Henry F Chambers Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2011-02-01 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Miwako Kobayashi; Daniel J Shapiro; Adam L Hersh; Guillermo V Sanchez; Lauri A Hicks Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2016-08-02 Impact factor: 3.835
Authors: Michael J Durkin; Matthew Keller; Anne M Butler; Jennie H Kwon; Erik R Dubberke; Aaron C Miller; Phillip M Polgreen; Margaret A Olsen Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2018-08-10 Impact factor: 3.835
Authors: Erica J Weinstein; Jennifer H Han; Ebbing Lautenbach; Irving Nachamkin; Charles Garrigan; Warren B Bilker; Lois Dankwa; Mary Wheeler; Pam Tolomeo; Judith A Anesi Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2019-03-14 Impact factor: 3.835
Authors: Lu Yu; Valerie P O'Brien; Jonathan Livny; Denise Dorsey; Nirmalya Bandyopadhyay; Marco Colonna; Michael G Caparon; Elisha DO Roberson; Scott J Hultgren; Thomas J Hannan Journal: Elife Date: 2019-08-20 Impact factor: 8.140
Authors: Javier Martínez-Casanova; Silvia Gómez-Zorrilla; Nuria Prim; Agustina Dal Molin; Daniel Echeverría-Esnal; María Pilar Gracia-Arnillas; Elena Sendra; Robert Güerri-Fernández; Xavier Durán-Jordà; Eduardo Padilla; Juan Pablo Horcajada; Santiago Grau; On Behalf Of The Proa-Psmar Group Journal: Antibiotics (Basel) Date: 2021-05-14