Literature DB >> 24552358

Superiority of fesoterodine 8 mg vs 4 mg in reducing urgency urinary incontinence episodes in patients with overactive bladder: results of the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled EIGHT trial.

Christopher Chapple1, Tim Schneider, François Haab, Franklin Sun, Laurence Whelan, David Scholfield, Erika Dragon, Erin Mangan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the superiority of fesoterodine 8 mg vs 4 mg for improvement in urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) episodes and other diary variables, diary-dry rate (proportion of patients with >0 UUI episodes on baseline diary and 0 UUI episodes on post-baseline diary), and improvements in measures of symptom bother, health-related quality of life (HRQL), and other patient-reported outcomes (PROs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a 12-week, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational trial of men and women aged ≥18 years with overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms including UUI (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT01302067). Patients were randomised (2:2:1) to receive fesoterodine 8 mg, fesoterodine 4 mg, or placebo once daily; those randomised to fesoterodine 8 mg started with fesoterodine 4 mg once daily for 1 week, then 8 mg once daily for the remaining 11 weeks. Patients completed bladder diaries at baseline and weeks 4 and 12 and the Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC), Urgency Perception Scale (UPS), and Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at baseline and week 12. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to week 12 in UUI episodes per 24 h.
RESULTS: At week 12, patients receiving fesoterodine 8 mg (779 patients) had significantly greater reductions from baseline in UUI episodes, micturitions, and urgency episodes than patients receiving fesoterodine 4 mg (790) or placebo (386); diary-dry rate was significantly higher in the fesoterodine 8-mg group vs the fesoterodine 4-mg and placebo groups (all P < 0.05). At week 12, patients receiving fesoterodine 8 mg also had significantly greater improvements in scores on the PPBC, UPS, and all OAB-q scales and domains than patients receiving fesoterodine 4 mg or placebo (all P < 0.01). Patients receiving fesoterodine 4 mg had significantly greater improvements in UUI episodes, urgency episodes, and micturitions; significantly higher diary-dry rates; and significantly greater improvement in PPBC scores and OAB-q scores than patients receiving placebo (all P < 0.05). Dry mouth was the most commonly reported adverse event (AE) in the fesoterodine groups (placebo group, 3.4%; fesoterodine 4-mg group, 12.9%; fesoterodine 8-mg group, 26.1%); most cases were mild or moderate in all treatment groups. Rates of serious AEs and discontinuations due to AEs were low in all groups.
CONCLUSIONS: In a 12-week, prospectively designed, superiority trial, fesoterodine 8 mg showed statistically significantly superior efficacy vs fesoterodine 4 mg and placebo, as measured by reductions in UUI episodes and other diary variables, diary-dry dry rate, and improvements in measures of symptom bother, HRQL, and other PROs; clear evidence of dose-dependent efficacy is unique to fesoterodine among antimuscarinics and other oral agents for the treatment of OAB. Fesoterodine 4 mg was significantly more effective than placebo on all outcomes except for improvements in UPS scores. These data support the benefit of having two doses of fesoterodine in clinical practice, with the recommended starting dose of 4 mg for all patients and the fesoterodine 8-mg dose available for patients who require a higher dose to achieve optimal symptom relief.
© 2014 The Authors. BJU International © 2014 BJU International.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dose comparison; dose response; dose titration; fesoterodine; overactive bladder; urgency urinary incontinence

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24552358     DOI: 10.1111/bju.12678

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  7 in total

1.  Efficacy of vibegron, a novel β3-adrenoreceptor agonist, on severe urgency urinary incontinence related to overactive bladder: post hoc analysis of a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, comparative phase 3 study.

Authors:  Masaki Yoshida; Masayuki Takeda; Momokazu Gotoh; Osamu Yokoyama; Hidehiro Kakizaki; Satoru Takahashi; Naoya Masumori; Shinji Nagai; Kazuyoshi Minemura
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2020-02-23       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Expert Opinion on Three Clinical Cases with a Common Urgent Problem: Urge Urinary Incontinence.

Authors:  Andrea Tubaro; John Heesakkers; Jean Nicolas Cornu; Dudley Robinson
Journal:  Case Rep Urol       Date:  2018-10-16

3.  Characterizing the Health-Related Quality of Life Burden of Overactive Bladder Using Disease-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Karissa M Johnston; David R Walker; Pardis Lakzadeh
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 3.845

4.  Urinary Urgency: A Symptom In Need Of A Cure.

Authors:  Stefano Salvatore; Montserrat Espuña-Pons; Andrea Tubaro
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2019-12-09

Review 5.  Which drugs are best for overactive bladder? From patients' expectations to physicians' decisions.

Authors:  Ian Milsom; Adrian Wagg; Matthias Oelke; Christopher Chapple
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  What are the chances of improvement or cure from overactive bladder? A pooled responder analysis of efficacy and treatment emergent adverse events following treatment with fesoterodine.

Authors:  Adrian S Wagg; Sender Herschorn; Martin Carlsson; Mireille Fernet; Matthias Oelke
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 2.367

7.  Urodynamic efficacy of fesoterodine for the treatment of neurogenic detrusor overactivity and/or low compliance bladder.

Authors:  Kanya Kaga; Tomonori Yamanishi; Mayuko Kaga; Miki Fuse; Tomohiko Kamasako; Mitsuru Ishizuka
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 3.369

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.