Jonathan L Silberstein1, Stephen A Poon2, Daniel D Sjoberg3, Alexandra C Maschino3, Andrew J Vickers3, Aaron Bernie4, Badrinath R Konety5, W Kevin Kelly6, James A Eastham4. 1. Department of Urology, Tulane University Medical School, New Orleans, LA, USA. 2. Department of Urology, Southern California Permanente Medical Group- Fontana Medical Center, Fontana, CA, USA. 3. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 4. Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 5. Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. 6. Departments of Urology and Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University and Hospitals, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine long-term oncological outcomes of radical prostatectomy (RP) after neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy (CHT) for clinically localised, high-risk prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this phase II multicentre trial of patients with high-risk prostate cancer (PSA level >20 ng/mL, Gleason ≥8, or clinical stage ≥T3), androgen-deprivation therapy (goserelin acetate depot) and paclitaxel, carboplatin and estramustine were administered before RP. We report the long-term oncological outcomes of these patients and compared them to a contemporary cohort who met oncological inclusion criteria but received RP only. RESULTS: In all, 34 patients were enrolled and followed for a median of 13.1 years. Within 10 years most patients had biochemical recurrence (BCR-free probability 22%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 10-37%). However, the probability of disease-specific survival at 10 years was 84% (95% CI 66-93%) and overall survival was 78% (95% CI 60-89%). The CHT group had higher-risk features than the comparison group (123 patients), with an almost doubled risk of calculated preoperative 5-year BCR (69% vs 36%, P < 0.01). After adjusting for these imbalances the CHT group had trends toward improvement in BCR (hazard ratio [HR] 0.76, 95% CI 0.43-1.34; P = 0.3) and metastasis-free survival (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.24-1.29; P = 0.2) although these were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant CHT followed by RP was associated with lower rates of BCR and metastasis compared with the RP-only group; however, these results were not statistically significant. Because this treatment strategy has known harms and unproven benefit, this strategy should only be instituted in the setting of a clinical trial.
OBJECTIVE: To determine long-term oncological outcomes of radical prostatectomy (RP) after neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy (CHT) for clinically localised, high-risk prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this phase II multicentre trial of patients with high-risk prostate cancer (PSA level >20 ng/mL, Gleason ≥8, or clinical stage ≥T3), androgen-deprivation therapy (goserelin acetate depot) and paclitaxel, carboplatin and estramustine were administered before RP. We report the long-term oncological outcomes of these patients and compared them to a contemporary cohort who met oncological inclusion criteria but received RP only. RESULTS: In all, 34 patients were enrolled and followed for a median of 13.1 years. Within 10 years most patients had biochemical recurrence (BCR-free probability 22%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 10-37%). However, the probability of disease-specific survival at 10 years was 84% (95% CI 66-93%) and overall survival was 78% (95% CI 60-89%). The CHT group had higher-risk features than the comparison group (123 patients), with an almost doubled risk of calculated preoperative 5-year BCR (69% vs 36%, P < 0.01). After adjusting for these imbalances the CHT group had trends toward improvement in BCR (hazard ratio [HR] 0.76, 95% CI 0.43-1.34; P = 0.3) and metastasis-free survival (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.24-1.29; P = 0.2) although these were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant CHT followed by RP was associated with lower rates of BCR and metastasis compared with the RP-only group; however, these results were not statistically significant. Because this treatment strategy has known harms and unproven benefit, this strategy should only be instituted in the setting of a clinical trial.
Authors: Robert W Carlson; D Craig Allred; Benjamin O Anderson; Harold J Burstein; Stephen B Edge; William B Farrar; Andres Forero; Sharon Hermes Giordano; Lori J Goldstein; William J Gradishar; Daniel F Hayes; Clifford A Hudis; Steven Jay Isakoff; Britt-Marie E Ljung; David A Mankoff; P Kelly Marcom; Ingrid A Mayer; Beryl McCormick; Lori J Pierce; Elizabeth C Reed; Mary Lou Smith; Hatem Soliman; George Somlo; Richard L Theriault; John H Ward; Antonio C Wolff; Richard Zellars; Rashmi Kumar; Dorothy A Shead Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2012-07-01 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Mark S Soloway; Kapil Pareek; Rooholiah Sharifi; Zev Wajsman; David McLeod; David P Wood; Antonio Puras-Baez Journal: J Urol Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Johann Sebastian de Bono; Stephane Oudard; Mustafa Ozguroglu; Steinbjørn Hansen; Jean-Pascal Machiels; Ivo Kocak; Gwenaëlle Gravis; Istvan Bodrogi; Mary J Mackenzie; Liji Shen; Martin Roessner; Sunil Gupta; A Oliver Sartor Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-10-02 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Michel Bolla; Laurence Collette; Léo Blank; Padraig Warde; Jean Bernard Dubois; René-Olivier Mirimanoff; Guy Storme; Jacques Bernier; Abraham Kuten; Cora Sternberg; Johan Mattelaer; José Lopez Torecilla; J Rafael Pfeffer; Carmel Lino Cutajar; Alfredo Zurlo; Marianne Pierart Journal: Lancet Date: 2002-07-13 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Badrinath R Konety; James A Eastham; Vicor E Reuter; Peter T Scardino; S Machele Donat; Guido Dalbagni; Paul Russo; Harry W Herr; Larry Schwartz; Philip W Kantoff; Howard Scher; W Kevin Kelly Journal: J Urol Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: James L Mohler; Andrew J Armstrong; Robert R Bahnson; Barry Boston; J Erik Busby; Anthony Victor D'Amico; James A Eastham; Charles A Enke; Thomas Farrington; Celestia S Higano; Eric Mark Horwitz; Philip W Kantoff; Mark H Kawachi; Michael Kuettel; Richard J Lee; Gary R MacVicar; Arnold W Malcolm; David Miller; Elizabeth R Plimack; Julio M Pow-Sang; Mack Roach; Eric Rohren; Stan Rosenfeld; Sandy Srinivas; Seth A Strope; Jonathan Tward; Przemyslaw Twardowski; Patrick C Walsh; Maria Ho; Dorothy A Shead Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Gaëtan Devos; Wout Devlies; Gert De Meerleer; Marcella Baldewijns; Thomas Gevaert; Lisa Moris; Daimantas Milonas; Hendrik Van Poppel; Charlien Berghen; Wouter Everaerts; Frank Claessens; Steven Joniau Journal: Nat Rev Urol Date: 2021-09-15 Impact factor: 14.432