| Literature DB >> 24551755 |
Seyed Masoud Hosseini1, Elham Amini2, Masoumeh Tavassoti Kheiri2, Parvaneh Mehrbod2, Mahsa Shahidi2, Ebrahim Zabihi3.
Abstract
There are many effective chemotherapeutic agents used in influenza disease which some of them inhibit virus replication by interfering with FluV (influenza virus) viral binding or its penetration into cell membrane. A series of polyoxometalates compounds such as POM-523 and PM-504 have been synthesized and have showed inhibitory effects on viruses. In this study we examined anti influenza activity of a novel polyoxometalate derivative (POM-4960) synthesized in the Faculty of Chemistry of Damghan University of Basic Sciences. To evaluate the anti-influenza activity of POM, following the treatment of FluV with POM at different temperatures and incubation periods, viral titer reduction was assessed by haemaglutination assay (HA). The 3-(4,5- dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay was used to determine TCID50 (tissue culture infective dose) of virus, CC50 (median cytotoxic concentration) of POM, protection percentage and antiviral activity of POM in cell culture. RT-PCR and direct Immunofluorescent assays were performed to evaluate the effect of POM on viral infection and viral RNA load, respectively. POM reduced HA titer near to zero in all cell culture specimens and showed high protection against viral infection of the cells. Reduction in viral infection was confirmed by RT-PCR and Immunofluorescent staining methods. Moreover, this POM derivative has a dual (cumulative) effect on attachment and penetration inhibition compared to other POM's with just one inhibitory effect. POM-4960 could be considered as a powerful anti-influenza agent with low toxicity and high antiviral potency.Entities:
Keywords: MTT; POM; RT-PCR; immunofluorescent; influenza virus
Year: 2012 PMID: 24551755 PMCID: PMC3920487
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Cell Med ISSN: 2251-9637
Fig 1Correlation between dose of POM-4960 and its cytotoxicity in MHCD cell line
The median cytotoxic concentration (CC50) and maximum tolerable concentration (MTC) of POM-4960 were calculated as 100µM.and 50 µM respectively*: Maximum tolerable concentration
MDCK cells viability after exposure to different concentration of POM-4960 on MDCK cells (MTT assay)
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 1 | 0.650000 |
| 10 | 0.649000 |
| 25 | 0.647500 |
| 50 | 0.647250 |
| 75 | 0.550250±0.04787 |
| 100 | 0.328250±0.02363 |
| 150 | 0.130250±0.01708 |
| 200 | 0.032750±0.02217 |
Confluent MDCK cells were exposed to different concentrations of POM-4960 for 48 h. The differential absorbance (OD 540-630nm) of blue dissolved formazane dye was measured in MTT assay. Values are averages of four independent examinations.
Significantly different compared to untreated group (p<0.0001).
Viability of MDCK cells infected by FluV exposed to POM-4960 with three differnet procedures (before,during, and after infection
|
|
|
|---|---|
| POM (50 µM) + virus | 0.50900 |
| virus → POM (50 µM) | 0.498825 |
| POM (50 µM)+virus → POM (50 µM) | 0.522195 |
| Cell control group | 0.645250 |
| Virus control group | 0.186125 |
MTD concentrations of POM-4960 were made in the cell culture media at the presence of FluV with three different procedures (before, after, and during infection). Viability of the cells were measured as differential OD540-630nm of produced formazan dye (MTT assay). Values are averages of four independent examinations.
FluV; influenza virus, POM-4960+virus; exposure to POM-4960 before FluV infection, Virus → POM - 4960(50µM); exposure to POM-4960 after FluV infection, POM(50µM) + virus → POM - 4960(50µM); exposure to POM-4960 after infection with POM-4960 treated FluV.
Significantly different from values obtained for POM treated compared to untreated sample (p<0.0001).
Protection percentage of POM-4960 against virus infection in each procedure
|
|
|
|---|---|
| POM (50 µM) + virus | 75 |
| virus → POM (50 µM) | 73 |
| POM (50 µM)+virus → POM (50 µM) | 78 |
Protection percentage was calculated using differential OD540-630nm of formazan (MTT test) in protection percentage formula (see the text for details). FluV; influenza virus, POM-4960+virus; exposure to POM-4960 before FluV infection, Virus → POM - 4960(50µM); exposure to POM-4960 after FluV infection, POM(50µM) + virus → POM - 4960(50µM); exposure to POM-4960 after infection with POM-4960 treated FluV.
Hemagglutination of virus in supernatants of cells exposed to POM-4960 (with procedures I, II, III) compared to control group (normal FluV MDCK cell infection
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Control (10-1) | 512 |
| Procedure I | 0 |
| Procedure II | 0 |
| Procedure III | 0 |
Hemagglutination of virus in all procedures (I, II, III)reduced to 0 HA unit. The experiments Values are averages of four independent examinations for HA assay. FluV; influenza virus, Procedure I: {POM-4960+virus; exposure to POM-4960 before FluV infection}, Procedure II: {Virus POM – 4960(50µm); exposure to POM-4960 after FluV infection}, Procedure III: {POM (50µM)+virus POM -4960(50µM); exposure to POM-4960 after infection with POM-4960 treated FluV}.
Fig 2RT-PCR products gel electrphoresis of vrial RNA content extracted from same number of cells and FluV inoculants, exposed to POM-4960 by three different procedures (I, II, III). PCR reaction carried out using M primer (for detection of matrix protein gene) of FluVA and NP primer (for detection of nucleoprotein gene) of FluVB as internal control. I: PCR product of experiment I, II: PCR product of experiment II, III: PCR product of experiment III, VA+VB: PCR product of FluV-A&B, VB: PCR product of FluV-B.
Fig 3The viral genome content in treated samples was assessed by band densitometry. The results show meaningful difference (p<0.05) between OD ratio of genome content of treated samples with POM-4960 (with three different procedures: I, II, & III) compared to virus sample. FluV-B genome was used as internal control to normalize different test procedures.