| Literature DB >> 24551490 |
Barbara Bachowska1, Julia Kazmierczak-Baranska2, Marcin Cieslak2, Barbara Nawrot2, Dorota Szczęsna3, Joanna Skalik3, Piotr Bałczewski4.
Abstract
Quaternary ammonium and phosphonium salts have been screened for their toxic effect on HeLa and K562 cancer cell lines, as well as on normal HUVEC cells. Tri-n-butyl-n-hexadecylphosphonium bromide, the first phosphonium salt with a halogen anion tested against HeLa cells, was 12 times more potent (IC50 <5 μm after 24 and 48 h) than the clinically used reference compound cisplatin and 17 times more potent than tri-n-hexyltetradecylphosphonium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide, which, to the best of our knowledge, is the first phosphonium salt to be evaluated in HeLa cells. However, it was inactive against K562 cells (24 and 48 h). According to a caspase-3/7 assay, its toxicity has not been connected with the induction of apoptosis. In contrast, triphenylalkylphosphonium iodides with shorter C1-5 alkyl chains were inactive against HeLa cells but very active against K562 cells (IC50=6-10 μm after 48 h). Phosphonium cations with halide counterions proved to be more potent than those with (CF3SO2)2N(-) as the anion, as in the anticancer agent NSC 747251, or other anions in molecules with similar alkyl chain lengths. On the other hand, a series of ammonium salts containing a short methylthiomethyl or methoxymethyl side chain revealed low cytotoxicity (IC50 >500 μm after 24 and 48 h) against both HeLa and K562 cancer cell lines as well as normal HUVEC cells, showing that the nontoxic N(+)CH2YMe (Y=S, O) structural motif in ammonium salts could be suitable for further optimization and development, especially in transfection experiments.Entities:
Keywords: cancer cells; cytotoxicity; gene delivery; phosphonium cations; transfection
Year: 2012 PMID: 24551490 PMCID: PMC3922438 DOI: 10.1002/open.201100003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ChemistryOpen ISSN: 2191-1363 Impact factor: 2.911
Figure 1Phosphorus- and sulfur-containing lipophilic QHS.
Scheme 1Phosphonium 8–10 and methylthiomethyl and methoxymethyl ammonium substituted QHS 11–17.
IC50 (μM) values calculated for compounds 8–17 from the dose–response curves in HeLa, K562 and HUVEC cells. cisplatin was used as a reference compound. IC50 values represent the mean (±SD) of eight or four, in the case of compounds 9 and 10, replicate cultures.
| Compd | HeLa | K562 | HUVEC | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 h | 48 h | 24 h | 48 h | 24 h | 48 h | |
| 4.7±2.2 | 4.8±7.1[ | 400±200 | 500±50 | 3.75±1.3 | 0.325±0.082 | |
| 600±42 | 100±5 | 900±54 | 10±0.5 | – | – | |
| 90±3.6 | 60±3 | 50±3.5 | 6±0.3 | – | – | |
| >500 | >500 | >500 | >500 | >500 | >500 | |
| cisplatin | 55±9[b] | 25±5.4[b] | 200±40[b] | 150±30[b] | 140[c] | 95±43[c] |
Compound 8 precipitated in the cell culture medium when used at a concentration of 500 μm. Therefore this data point was omitted [b] Cisplatin was freshly dissolved in DMSO. [c] Cisplatin was dissolved in water.
Figure 2Fluorescence intensity (I) showing the expression of GFP in HEK293T cells transfected with pmaxGFP plasmid DNA in the presence of compounds 11–17 either in 5- or 10-fold charge excess above the total charge of DNA. Cells treated with lipofectamine only (CL), cells incubated with plasmid DNA only (P+D), cells transfected with pmaxGFP vector DNA in the presence of lipofectamine (P+L). Error bars indicate standard deviations (±SD).
Figure 3Fluorescence intensity (I) showing apoptosis of HeLa cells treated with compound 8 after 6 h (▪) and 24 h (▪). Apoptosis was determined using a caspase-3/7 assay. Untreated cells (control cells), cells treated with 2 % DMSO (DMSO), cells treated with staurosporine (staurosporine), cells treated with 8 dissolved in aqueous 2 % DMSO (8). Error bars indicate standard deviations (±SD) of four replicates.