| Literature DB >> 24551343 |
Patricia C Dykes1, Dean Wantland2, Luann Whittenburg3, Stuart Lipsitz1, Virginia K Saba4.
Abstract
While nursing activities represent a significant proportion of inpatient care, there are no reliable methods for determining nursing costs based on the actual services provided by the nursing staff. Capture of data to support accurate measurement and reporting on the cost of nursing services is fundamental to effective resource utilization. Adopting standard terminologies that support tracking both the quality and the cost of care could reduce the data entry burden on direct care providers. This pilot study evaluated the feasibility of using a standardized nursing terminology, the Clinical Care Classification System (CCC), for developing a reliable costing method for nursing services. Two different approaches are explored; the Relative Value Unit RVU and the simple cost-to-time methods. We found that the simple cost-to-time method was more accurate and more transparent in its derivation than the RVU method and may support a more consistent and reliable approach for costing nursing services.Keywords: CCC; Clinical Care Classification System; cost; electronic health record; nursing services; terminology standards
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24551343 PMCID: PMC3900184
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc ISSN: 1559-4076