| Literature DB >> 24550964 |
Rubina Nazli1, Muhammad Akmal Khan2, Tasleem Akhtar3, Ghosia Lutfullah4, Nabila Sher Mohammad5, Jawad Ahmad6, Jamila Haider7, Hina Aslam8.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate abnormal lipid metabolism as a risk factor of eclampsia in pregnant women.Entities:
Keywords: Eclampsia; Hypertension; Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province; Lipoprotein; Lipoprotein ratio
Year: 2013 PMID: 24550964 PMCID: PMC3905371 DOI: 10.12669/pjms.296.3863
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pak J Med Sci ISSN: 1681-715X Impact factor: 1.088
Socio-demographic and reproductive characteristics of the study groups
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 29.54 | 30.04 | NS |
| Gestation age (weeks) | 31.83 | 29.72 | NS |
| Parity (n) | 2.78 | 4.04 | 0.01 |
| Systolic BP (mm Hg) | 155.58 | 116 | 0.001 |
| Diastolic BP (mm Hg) | 103.66 | 75.28 | 0.001 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 29.27 | 28.94 | NS |
Lipoprotein concentrations among the study groups of pregnant women
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Cholesterol | 216.63 | 202.23 | 7.1↑ | NS |
| HDL-Cholesterol | 40.83 | 52.20 | 21.7 ↓ | 0.001 |
| LDL-Cholesterol | 110.54 | 107.42 | 2.90 ↑ | NS |
| VLDL-Cholesterol | 66.93 | 42.22 | 58.5↑ | 0.001 |
| Triglyceride | 337.71 | 212.30 | 59.1↑ | 0.001 |
| APO-A1 | 144.43 | 190.14 | 24.0↓ | 0.001 |
| APO-B100 | 120.06 | 128.33 | 6.4↓ | NS |
| Lpa | 81.62 | 58.3 | 40.0↑ | 0.001 |
Comparison of lipoprotein ratio among the patient and control groups
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apo B100: Apo-A1 | 0.83 | 0.67 | 23.9↑ | NS |
| TC:HDL-C | 5.49 | 3.87 | 41.9↑ | 0.001 |
| LDL-C:HDL-C | 2.77 | 2.05 | 79.0↑ | 0.001 |
| TG:HDL-C | 8.70 | 4.35 | 100↑ | 0.001 |
| HDL-C: VLDL-C | 0.71 | 1.36 | 47.8↓ | 0.001 |
| LDL: APO-B100 | 1.02 | 0.81 | 25.9↑ | 0.01 |
| HDL:APO-A1 | 0.31 | 0.28 | 10.7↑ | NS |
Comparison in different categories of lipoprotein concentrations among the study groups
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||
| < 200 | Desirable | 41.3 | 53.8 |
| 200-239 | High | 22.9 | 23.1 |
| > 240 | Undesirable | 35.8 | 23.1 |
|
| |||
| > 60 | Desirable | 4.7 | 18.9 |
| 40-60 | Acceptable | 44.9 | 67.8 |
| < 40 | Undesirable | 50.5 | 13.3 |
|
| |||
| < 100 | Optimal | 41.5 | 51.1 |
| 100-129 | Near optimal | 21.7 | 22.2 |
| 130-159 | Borderline high | 23.6 | 11.1 |
| 160-189 | High | 6.6 | 7.8 |
|
| Very high | 6.6 | 7.8 |
|
| |||
| < 129 | Optimal | 95.4 | 100 |
| 130-159 | Borderline high | 3.7 | - |
| > 160 | High | 0.9 | - |
|
| |||
| 0-149 | Normal | 4.6 | 14.6 |
| 150-199 | Borderline high | 6.5 | 34.8 |
| 200-499 | High | 73.2 | 49.4 |
| > 500 | Very high | 15.7 | 1.1 |
|
| |||
|
| Desirable | 47.7 | 85.6 |
| > 5.1 | Undesirable | 52.3 | 14.4 |
|
| |||
| < 1.21 | Desirable | 9.4 | 18.9 |
| 1.21-1.6 | Acceptable | 8.5 | 21.1 |
| > 1.6 | Undesirable | 82.1 | 60.0 |
|
| |||
| < 3.3 | Desirable | 100 | 98.9 |
| > 3.3 | Undesirable | - | 1.1 |