| Literature DB >> 24550715 |
Luciano Piani1, Claudia Bruna Rizzardini1, Adriano Papo1, Daniele Goi1.
Abstract
Rheological behaviour of recycled sludge from a secondary clarifier of a municipal wastewater treatment plant was studied by using the rate controlled coaxial cylinder viscometer Rotovisko-Haake 20, system M5-osc., measuring device NV. The tests (hysteresis cycles) were performed under continuous flow conditions and following an ad hoc measurement protocol. Sludge shear stress versus shear rate curves were fitted very satisfactorily by rheological models. An experimental equation correlating the solid concentration of sludge to relative viscosity and fitting satisfactorily flow curves at different Total Suspended Solids (TTS%) was obtained. Application of the empirical correlation should allow the monitoring of the proper functioning of a wastewater treatment plant measuring viscosity of sludge.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24550715 PMCID: PMC3914390 DOI: 10.1155/2014/590961
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Characteristics of tested sludges.
| Sample | Initial sludge | Thickened sludge | Dilution 4 : 1 | Dilution 3 : 1 | Dilution 2 : 1 | Dilution 1 : 1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSS (g/L) | TSS (g/L) | TSS (g/L) | TSS (g/L) | TSS (g/L) | TSS (g/L) | |
| S1 | 4.088 | 8.025 | 6.420 | 6.019 | 5.350 | 4.013 |
| S2 | 1.781 | 8.750 | 7.000 | 6.563 | 5.833 | 4.375 |
| S3 | 3.960 | 8.410 | 6.728 | 6.308 | 5.607 | 4.205 |
Figure 1Hysteresis cycles drawn for some of the activated sludge investigated.
Figure 2(a, b, c) Shear stress (τ) versus shear rate () flow curves determined for the activated sludges investigated.
Figure 3Equation (1) plots at different TSS% of activated sludge.
Figure 4Comparison of equation (1) with experimental flow curves of sludge S1.
Figure 5Comparison of equation (1) with flow curves of sludge S2.
Figure 6Comparison of equation (1) with flow curves of sludge S3.
Comparison between experimental and calculated TSS% values, relative error, standard deviation (SD) estimates, and coefficient of determination (R 2) values for the model investigated.
| Sludge | TSS (g/L) | TSS% experimen. | TSS% calculated | Relative error | SD |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | 4.088 | 0.41 | 0.46 | 0.122 | 0.094 | 0.860 |
| Dil. 1 : 1 | 4.013 | 0.40 | 0.30 | 0.250 | 0.075 | 0.900 |
| Dil. 2 : 1 | 5.350 | 0.53 | 0.58 | 0.094 | 0.174 | 0.920 |
| Dil. 3 : 1 | 6.019 | 0.60 | 0.63 | 0.117 | 0.139 | 0.930 |
| Dil. 4 : 1 | 6.420 | 0.64 | 0.74 | 0.156 | 0.162 | 0.946 |
| S1 thick. | 8.025 | 0.80 | 0.78 | 0.025 | 0.095 | 0.986 |
| S2 | 1.781 | 0.18 | 0.21 | 0.167 | 0.037 | 0.887 |
| Dil. 1 : 1 | 4.375 | 0.44 | 0.41 | 0.068 | 0.052 | 0.907 |
| Dil. 2 : 1 | 5.833 | 0.58 | 0.54 | 0.069 | 0.104 | 0.915 |
| Dil. 3 : 1 | 6.563 | 0.65 | 0.71 | 0.092 | 0.172 | 0.931 |
| Dil. 4 : 1 | 7.000 | 0.70 | 0.77 | 0.100 | 0.118 | 0.975 |
| S2 thick. | 8.750 | 0.87 | 0.88 | 0.011 | 0.252 | 0.996 |
| S3 | 3.960 | 0.40 | 0.38 | 0.050 | 0.084 | 0.927 |
| Dil. 1 : 1 | 4.205 | 0.42 | 0.45 | 0.071 | 0.126 | 0.917 |
| Dil. 2 : 1 | 5.607 | 0.56 | 0.63 | 0.125 | 0.188 | 0.901 |
| Dil. 3 : 1 | 6.308 | 0.63 | 0.72 | 0.143 | 0.234 | 0.919 |
| Dil. 4 : 1 | 6.728 | 0.67 | 0.78 | 0.164 | 0.296 | 0.950 |
| S3 thick. | 8.410 | 0.83 | 0.90 | 0.084 | 0.495 | 0.988 |