| Literature DB >> 24550699 |
Fernanda Malaquias Barboza1, Willian Moreira Machado2, Luiz Renato Olchanheski Junior2, Josiane Padilha de Paula1, Sônia Faria Zawadzki3, Daniel Fernandes2, Paulo Vitor Farago1.
Abstract
Microparticles of poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) andEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24550699 PMCID: PMC3914481 DOI: 10.1155/2014/268107
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Figure 1Chemical structure of manidipine.
Composition of manidipine-loaded and unloaded PCL/PHBV microparticles.
| Formulation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Organic | ||||||
| MAN (g) | — | 0.1 | 0.2 | — | 0.1 | 0.2 |
| PCL (g) | 2.0 | 1.9 | 1.8 | — | — | — |
| PHBV (g) | — | — | — | 2.0 | 1.9 | 1.8 |
| Dichloromethane (mL) | 40 | 40 | 40 | — | — | — |
| Chloroform (mL) | — | — | — | 40 | 40 | 40 |
| Aqueous | ||||||
| 2% PVA solution (mL) | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 |
| Polysorbate 80 (g) | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
| NaOH 0.1 M (mL) | 2 | 2 | 2 | — | — | — |
Mathematical models applied to dissolution experiments.
| Model | Equation |
|---|---|
| Dissolution efficiency |
|
| First-order | % |
| Biexponential | % |
| Zero-order | % |
| Weibull | % |
| Monolag | % |
%D: dissolved percentage; b: shape parameter; TD: time interval necessary to release 63.2% of the drug; k, α, and β: kinetics constants; t: dissolution time; A and B: initial drug concentrations that contribute for the two dissolution stages.
Loading efficiency values obtained to MAN-loaded PCL and PHBV microparticles.
| Formulation | Loading efficiency (%) ± SD* |
|---|---|
|
| 88.99 ± 1.46 |
|
| 89.79 ± 2.88 |
|
| 85.29 ± 2.28 |
|
| 90.98 ± 2.43 |
*SD: standard deviation.
Figure 2SEM photomicrographs of PCL and PHBV microparticles: PCL-M0 (a), PCL-M5 (b), PCL-M10 (c), PHBV-M0 (d), PHBV-M5 (e), and PHBV-M10 (f).
Figure 3X-ray diffractions spectra of MAN, PCL, physical mixture (MAN + PCL), and PCL microparticles.
Figure 4X-ray diffractions spectra of MAN, PHBV, physical mixture (MAN + PHBV), and PHBV microparticles.
Particle size and granulometric size distribution of PCL and PHBV formulations.
| Formulation | Average particle size ( | Span |
|---|---|---|
|
| 5.69 | 1.52 |
|
| 6.49 | 1.73 |
|
| 6.74 | 2.21 |
|
| 6.04 | 1.17 |
|
| 7.66 | 1.79 |
|
| 4.10 | 1.40 |
Figure 5FTIR spectra of MAN, PCL, physical mixture (MAN + PCL), and PCL microparticles.
Figure 6FTIR spectra of MAN, PHBV, physical mixture (MAN + PHBV), and PHBV microparticles.
Figure 7Release profiles of MAN and MAN-loaded microparticles into acetate buffer (50 mM, pH 4.0).
Release data from MAN and MAN-loaded microparticles.
| Biexponential model | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSC |
|
|
| |
| MAN | 2.7983 | 0.9930 | 0.8703 | 0.7732 |
| PCL-M5 | 4.7431 | 0.9973 | 2.5659 | 0.0619 |
| PCL-M10 | 4.7644 | 0.9979 | 1.5495 | 0.1234 |
| PHBV-M5 | 4.8927 | 0.9988 | 1.8285 | 0.0959 |
| PHBV-M10 | 5.8751 | 0.9992 | 2.3060 | 0.1698 |
Figure 8Effects of MAN on mean arterial pressure (MAP) after phenylephrine injection. Formulations PCL-M5 and PHBV-M5, pure MAN, and water (control group) were administered orally to the animals. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA test followed by Dunnet's post hoc test.