| Literature DB >> 24550587 |
Heqin Zhan1, Shengying Li1, Juan Sun2, Ruili Liu1, Fulin Yan1, Bingxuan Niu1, Haifang Zhang1, Xinyao Wang3.
Abstract
AIMS: The aim of the study was to investigate the effects of LGB on cerebral ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury in rats and the mechanisms of action of LGB.Entities:
Keywords: Cerebral I/R injury; LGB; P. laciniata; gene; lettuce glycoside B; neuroprotective effect; protein
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24550587 PMCID: PMC3912810 DOI: 10.4103/0253-7613.125171
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Pharmacol ISSN: 0253-7613 Impact factor: 1.200
Figure 1The chemical structure of lettuce glycoside B (LGB). LGB used for this study was extracted and isolated from 10 kg of Pterocypsela laciniata and purity was not less than 98%.
Figure 2Effects of lettuce glycoside B on histopathology of right brain after brain ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats (× 200). Photos represent hematoxylin-eosin staining
Figure 3Effects of lettuce glycoside B on infarct rate of the brain tissue following ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury in rats (n= 10). Data are represented as mean ± standard deviation and analyzed using analysis of variance, followed by LSD(Least Significant Difference) test. *P < 0.05,**P < 0.01, I/R+ lettuce glycoside B compared with I/R group; #P < 0.05, I/R + LM group compared with I/R + LL and I/R + LH group
Figure 4Effects of lettuce glycoside B on nerve growth factor and neurotrophin-3 mRNA expression of cerebral cortex after brain ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury in rats (n= 6). Results are expressed as mean± standard deviation and analyzed using analysis of variance followed by LSD (L) test. *P < 0.05, I/R group compared with the sham group; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, I/R + LGB group compared with I/R group; ΔP < 0.05, I/R + LM group compared with I/R + LL and I/R + LH group
Figure 5Effects of lettuce glycoside B on nerve growth factor and neurotrophin-3 immunoreactivity expression of cerebral cortex after brain ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury in rats (n= 8). Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation and analyzed using analysis of variance, followed by LSD (L) test. *P < 0.05, I/R group compared with the sham group; #P < 0.05 or ##P < 0.01, I/R + LGB group compared with I/R group; ΔP < 0.05, I/R + LM group compared with I/R + LL and I/R + LH group