BACKGROUND: Despite a sufficient coronary blood flow after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction; some patients have a poor outcome because of microcirculatory damage. This study evaluates whether the thermodilution-derived coronary blood flow parameters immediately after primary percutaneous coronary intervention predict early microvascular damage and midterm outcomes in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using a pressure sensor/thermistor-tipped guidewire, we measured the index of microcirculatory resistance at maximum hyperemia, and coronary blood flow pattern was assessed from the thermodilution curves after successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention in 88 patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Coronary blood flow pattern was classified into 3 groups according to the shape of thermodilution curve: a narrow unimodal (n=41), a wide unimodal (n=32), or bimodal (n=15). All patients had contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance scans within 2 weeks. The index of microcirculatory resistance values were significantly higher both in a wide unimodal and in a bimodal groups than in a narrow unimodal group (65±41 and 76±38 versus 20±9U; P<0.001). Bimodal group had higher prevalence of microvascular obstruction on contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance when compared with the other groups (100%, 78%, and 30%; P<0.001). Patients in bimodal group had a higher risk of death and heart failure rehospitalization at 6 months (73%, 6.3%, 7.3%; P<0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that bimodal shape of the thermodilution curve was the only independent predictor of cardiac death at 6 months after ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A bimodal shape of the thermodilution curve, which may indicate myocardial edema and consequent extrinsic compression of the capillary network, is associated with microcirculatory damage and poor midterm clinical outcomes rather than index of microcirculatory resistance value itself.
BACKGROUND: Despite a sufficient coronary blood flow after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction; some patients have a poor outcome because of microcirculatory damage. This study evaluates whether the thermodilution-derived coronary blood flow parameters immediately after primary percutaneous coronary intervention predict early microvascular damage and midterm outcomes in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using a pressure sensor/thermistor-tipped guidewire, we measured the index of microcirculatory resistance at maximum hyperemia, and coronary blood flow pattern was assessed from the thermodilution curves after successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention in 88 patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Coronary blood flow pattern was classified into 3 groups according to the shape of thermodilution curve: a narrow unimodal (n=41), a wide unimodal (n=32), or bimodal (n=15). All patients had contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance scans within 2 weeks. The index of microcirculatory resistance values were significantly higher both in a wide unimodal and in a bimodal groups than in a narrow unimodal group (65±41 and 76±38 versus 20±9U; P<0.001). Bimodal group had higher prevalence of microvascular obstruction on contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance when compared with the other groups (100%, 78%, and 30%; P<0.001). Patients in bimodal group had a higher risk of death and heart failure rehospitalization at 6 months (73%, 6.3%, 7.3%; P<0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that bimodal shape of the thermodilution curve was the only independent predictor of cardiac death at 6 months after ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A bimodal shape of the thermodilution curve, which may indicate myocardial edema and consequent extrinsic compression of the capillary network, is associated with microcirculatory damage and poor midterm clinical outcomes rather than index of microcirculatory resistance value itself.
Authors: Annette M Maznyczka; Peter J McCartney; Keith G Oldroyd; Mitchell Lindsay; Margaret McEntegart; Hany Eteiba; Paul Rocchiccioli; Richard Good; Aadil Shaukat; Keith Robertson; Vivek Kodoth; John P Greenwood; James M Cotton; Stuart Hood; Stuart Watkins; Peter W Macfarlane; Julie Kennedy; R Campbell Tait; Paul Welsh; Naveed Sattar; Damien Collison; Lynsey Gillespie; Alex McConnachie; Colin Berry Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2020-01-28 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: John-Ross D Clarke; Randol Kennedy; Freddy Duarte Lau; Gilead I Lancaster; Stuart W Zarich Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2019-12-29 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Mihir A Kelshiker; Henry Seligman; James P Howard; Haseeb Rahman; Michael Foley; Alexandra N Nowbar; Christopher A Rajkumar; Matthew J Shun-Shin; Yousif Ahmad; Sayan Sen; Rasha Al-Lamee; Ricardo Petraco Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2022-04-19 Impact factor: 35.855
Authors: Shu Ning Yew; David Carrick; David Corcoran; Nadeem Ahmed; Jaclyn Carberry; Vannesa Teng Yue May; Margaret McEntegart; Mark C Petrie; Hany Eteiba; Mitchell Lindsay; Stuart Hood; Stuart Watkins; Andrew Davie; Ahmed Mahrous; Ify Mordi; Ian Ford; Keith G Oldroyd; Colin Berry Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2018-08-07 Impact factor: 5.501