Literature DB >> 24550387

A charge-inverting mutation in the "linker" region of α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptors alters agonist binding and gating kinetics independently of allosteric modulators.

Jonathan E Harms1, Morris Benveniste, Markus Kessler, Leslie M Stone, Amy C Arai, Kathryn M Partin.   

Abstract

AMPA receptors are gated through binding of glutamate to a solvent-accessible ligand-binding domain. Upon glutamate binding, these receptors undergo a series of conformational rearrangements regulating channel function. Allosteric modulators can bind within a pocket adjacent to the ligand-binding domain to stabilize specific conformations and prevent desensitization. Yelshansky et al. (Yelshansky, M. V., Sobolevsky, A. I., Jatzke, C., and Wollmuth, L. P. (2004) J. Neurosci. 24, 4728-4736) described a model of an electrostatic interaction between the ligand-binding domain and linker region to the pore that regulated channel desensitization. To test this hypothesis, we have conducted a series of experiments focusing on the R628E mutation. Using ultrafast perfusion with voltage clamp, we applied glutamate to outside-out patches pulled from transiently transfected HEK 293 cells expressing wild type or R628E mutant GluA2. In response to a brief pulse of glutamate (1 ms), mutant receptors deactivated with significantly slower kinetics than wild type receptors. In addition, R628E receptors showed significantly more steady-state current in response to a prolonged (500-ms) glutamate application. These changes in receptor kinetics occur through a pathway that is independent of that of allosteric modulators, which show an additive effect on R628E receptors. In addition, ligand binding assays revealed the R628E mutation to have increased affinity for agonist. Finally, we reconciled experimental data with computer simulations that explicitly model mutant and modulator interactions. Our data suggest that R628E stabilizes the receptor closed cleft conformation by reducing agonist dissociation and the transition to the desensitized state. These results suggest that the AMPA receptor external vestibule is a viable target for new positive allosteric modulators.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer Modeling; Electrophysiology; Gating; Glutamate Receptors, Ionotropic (AMPA, NMDA); Glutamate Receptors, Metabotropic; Structural Biology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24550387      PMCID: PMC4036187          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M113.526921

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  50 in total

1.  The transmembrane AMPA receptor regulatory protein gamma 4 is a more effective modulator of AMPA receptor function than stargazin (gamma 2).

Authors:  Christoph Körber; Markus Werner; Sabine Kott; Zhan-Lu Ma; Michael Hollmann
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Aggresome formation.

Authors:  Michael J Corboy; Philip J Thomas; W Christian Wigley
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2005

3.  Targeting AMPA receptor gating processes with allosteric modulators and mutations.

Authors:  Nicholas A Mitchell; Mark W Fleck
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-01-05       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Different domains of the AMPA receptor direct stargazin-mediated trafficking and stargazin-mediated modulation of kinetics.

Authors:  Matthew A Bedoukian; Autumn M Weeks; Kathryn M Partin
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Two families of TARP isoforms that have distinct effects on the kinetic properties of AMPA receptors and synaptic currents.

Authors:  Chang-Hoon Cho; Fannie St-Gelais; Wei Zhang; Susumu Tomita; James R Howe
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Tuning of synapse number, structure and function in the cochlea.

Authors:  Alexander C Meyer; Thomas Frank; Darina Khimich; Gerhard Hoch; Dietmar Riedel; Nikolai M Chapochnikov; Yury M Yarin; Benjamin Harke; Stefan W Hell; Alexander Egner; Tobias Moser
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-08       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Use of [3H]fluorowillardiine to study properties of AMPA receptor allosteric modulators.

Authors:  Markus Kessler; Amy C Arai
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Stargazin controls the pharmacology of AMPA receptor potentiators.

Authors:  Susumu Tomita; Masayuki Sekiguchi; Keiji Wada; Roger A Nicoll; David S Bredt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-06-19       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Mechanism of positive allosteric modulators acting on AMPA receptors.

Authors:  Rongsheng Jin; Suzanne Clark; Autumn M Weeks; Joshua T Dudman; Eric Gouaux; Kathryn M Partin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-09-28       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Distinct structural features of cyclothiazide are responsible for effects on peak current amplitude and desensitization kinetics at iGluR2.

Authors:  Helle Hald; Philip K Ahring; Daniel B Timmermann; Tommy Liljefors; Michael Gajhede; Jette S Kastrup
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  4 in total

1.  Identification of critical functional determinants of kainate receptor modulation by auxiliary protein Neto2.

Authors:  Theanne N Griffith; Geoffrey T Swanson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2015-09-20       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  The quantal component of synaptic transmission from sensory hair cells to the vestibular calyx.

Authors:  Stephen M Highstein; Mary Anne Mann; Gay R Holstein; Richard D Rabbitt
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Two adjacent phenylalanines in the NMDA receptor GluN2A subunit M3 domain interactively regulate alcohol sensitivity and ion channel gating.

Authors:  Hong Ren; Yulin Zhao; Man Wu; Donard S Dwyer; Robert W Peoples
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2016-11-19       Impact factor: 5.250

4.  Unitary Properties of AMPA Receptors with Reduced Desensitization.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Clarissa Eibl; Autumn M Weeks; Irene Riva; Yan-Jun Li; Andrew J R Plested; James R Howe
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 4.033

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.