Literature DB >> 24550216

The 0.1% of the population with glucokinase monogenic diabetes can be recognized by clinical characteristics in pregnancy: the Atlantic Diabetes in Pregnancy cohort.

Ali J Chakera1, Gill Spyer, Nicola Vincent, Sian Ellard, Andrew T Hattersley, Fidelma P Dunne.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Identifying glucokinase monogenic diabetes (GCK-MODY) in pregnancy is important, as management is different from management for other forms of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and there is no increased maternal risk of type 2 diabetes. We calculated the population prevalence of GCK-MODY in pregnancy and determined the clinical characteristics that differentiate pregnant women with GCK-MODY from those with GDM. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We calculated the population prevalence of GCK-MODY in pregnancy by testing a subset of patients from the population-based Atlantic Diabetes in Pregnancy (Atlantic DIP) study (n = 5,500). We sequenced for GCK mutations in 247 women with a fasting glucose ≥5.1 mmol/L and 109 randomly selected control subjects with normal fasting glucose. Using data from the cases found and 40 previously identified GCK-MODY pregnancies, we analyzed whether clinical criteria could be used to differentiate GCK-MODY from GDM.
RESULTS: Four women with fasting glucose ≥5.1 mmol/L were diagnosed with GCK-MODY. No cases were identified with normal fasting glucose. The population prevalence of GCK-MODY is 1.1 in 1,000 (95% CI 0.3-2.9 in 1,000) and prevalence in GDM is 0.9% (95% CI 0.3-2.3). Fasting glucose and BMI significantly differentiate GCK-MODY from GDM (P < 0.0001). Combined criteria of BMI <25 kg/m(2) and fasting glucose ≥5.5 mmol/L has a sensitivity 68%, specificity 96%, and number needed to test of 2.7 women with GDM to find one case of GCK-MODY.
CONCLUSIONS: Our large population cohort of pregnant women tested estimates the population prevalence of GCK-MODY of 1.1 in 1,000. We have shown routine clinical criteria that can identify which women should be tested for GCK-MODY in pregnancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24550216     DOI: 10.2337/dc13-2248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  38 in total

1.  Management and pregnancy outcomes of women with GCK-MODY enrolled in the US Monogenic Diabetes Registry.

Authors:  Laura T Dickens; Lisa R Letourneau; May Sanyoura; Siri Atma W Greeley; Louis H Philipson; Rochelle N Naylor
Journal:  Acta Diabetol       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 4.280

2.  GCK-MODY in the US National Monogenic Diabetes Registry: frequently misdiagnosed and unnecessarily treated.

Authors:  David Carmody; Rochelle N Naylor; Charles D Bell; Shivani Berry; Jazzmyne T Montgomery; Elizabeth C Tadie; Jessica L Hwang; Siri Atma W Greeley; Louis H Philipson
Journal:  Acta Diabetol       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 4.280

3.  Genetic Counseling for Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Stephanie A Stein; Kristin L Maloney; Toni I Pollin
Journal:  Curr Genet Med Rep       Date:  2014-06-01

Review 4.  When is it MODY? Challenges in the Interpretation of Sequence Variants in MODY Genes.

Authors:  Sara Althari; Anna L Gloyn
Journal:  Rev Diabet Stud       Date:  2016-02-10

Review 5.  Glucokinase MODY and implications for treatment goals of common forms of diabetes.

Authors:  Ramzi A Ajjan; Katharine R Owen
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 6.  Monogenic diabetes: the impact of making the right diagnosis.

Authors:  Anastasia G Harris; Lisa R Letourneau; Siri Atma W Greeley
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.856

7.  Adolescent non-adherence reveals a genetic cause for diabetes.

Authors:  D Carmody; K L Lindauer; R N Naylor
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.359

Review 8.  The Genetic Architecture of Diabetes in Pregnancy: Implications for Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Kleinberger; Kristin A Maloney; Toni I Pollin
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 9.  How can maturity-onset diabetes of the young be identified among more common diabetes subtypes?

Authors:  Jana Urbanova; Ludmila Brunerova; Jan Broz
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 10.  Monogenic Diabetes: What It Teaches Us on the Common Forms of Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Yisheng Yang; Lawrence Chan
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 19.871

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.