Literature DB >> 24550064

Comparison of residual shunt rates in five devices used to treat patent foramen ovale.

Koichiro Matsumura1, Rubine Gevorgyan, Daniel Mangels, Reza Masoomi, Mohammad Khalid Mojadidi, Jonathan Tobis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effective closure rate among devices used for transcatheter patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure, and to discuss the management of patients with large residual shunts.
BACKGROUND: Several devices are used off-label for transcatheter closure of a PFO in the United States. The rate of residual shunting after PFO closure varies by device. Failure of effective closure poses risk of a recurrent cerebrovascular event, persistent migraine, or recurrent orthodeoxia.
METHODS: Patients who underwent PFO closure in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory at UCLA between 2001 and 2013 and had baseline and adequate follow-up transcranial Doppler studies following device placement were enrolled in the study.
RESULTS: Of 167 patients whose records were analyzed, effective PFO closure occurred in 90% (150/167) of patients. The highest effective closure rate was with the Amplatzer Septal Occluder (ASO; 100%), followed by the Amplatzer Cribriform (93%), Gore Helex (90%), Amplatzer PFO (86%), and CardioSEAL (86%) device. The highest rate of residual shunting was observed after placement of the 30-mm Gore Helex device (55%). Of the 17 patients with a residual shunt, three required a repeat PFO closure procedure due to a significant residual shunt associated with recurrent pulmonary emboli or profound orthodeoxia. All three patients received an ASO which successfully closed the residual shunt.
CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter PFO closure has a high success rate, but a moderate residual shunt occurs in about 10% of cases. The observed incidence of residual shunting after PFO closure is significantly larger with the 30-mm Helex device.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  atrial septal defects; patent foramen ovale; percutaneous closure of PFO

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24550064     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.25453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  4 in total

1.  Role of occlusive devices to prevent thromboembolism among persons with a patent foramen ovale and prior stroke.

Authors:  Christopher Roth; Oluseun Alli
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.598

2.  Use of the NobleStitch™ EL for the treatment of patients with residual right-to-left shunt following device closure of PFO.

Authors:  Nadia Chaudhry-Waterman; Stephen Shapiro; James Thompson
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2021-02-11

Review 3.  Advances in Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: From the Procedure to the Echocardiographic Guidance.

Authors:  Simona Sperlongano; Mario Giordano; Giovanni Ciccarelli; Giuseppe Bassi; Marco Malvezzi Caracciolo D'Aquino; Carmen Del Giudice; Gianpiero Gaio; Antonello D'Andrea; Adriana Postolache; Maurizio Cappelli Bigazzi; Giancarlo Scognamiglio; Berardo Sarubbi; Maria Giovanna Russo; Paolo Golino; Patrizio Lancellotti
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Effectiveness and Safety of Transcatheter Patent Foramen Ovale Closure for Migraine (EASTFORM) Trial.

Authors:  Ying-Qi Xing; Yu-Zhu Guo; Yong-Sheng Gao; Zhen-Ni Guo; Peng-Peng Niu; Yi Yang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.